Cargando…
Performance comparison of two whole genome amplification techniques in frame of multifactor preimplantation genetic testing
PURPOSE: To compare multiple displacement amplification and OmniPlex whole genome amplification technique performance during array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH), Sanger sequencing, SNaPshot and fragment size analysis downstream applications in frame of multifactor embryo preimplantation ge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6086788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29687370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1187-4 |
_version_ | 1783346561125711872 |
---|---|
author | Volozonoka, Ludmila Perminov, Dmitry Korņejeva, Liene Alkšere, Baiba Novikova, Natālija Pīmane, Evija Jokste Blumberga, Arita Kempa, Inga Miskova, Anna Gailīte, Linda Fodina, Violeta |
author_facet | Volozonoka, Ludmila Perminov, Dmitry Korņejeva, Liene Alkšere, Baiba Novikova, Natālija Pīmane, Evija Jokste Blumberga, Arita Kempa, Inga Miskova, Anna Gailīte, Linda Fodina, Violeta |
author_sort | Volozonoka, Ludmila |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare multiple displacement amplification and OmniPlex whole genome amplification technique performance during array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH), Sanger sequencing, SNaPshot and fragment size analysis downstream applications in frame of multifactor embryo preimplantation genetic testing. METHODS: Preclinical workup included linked short tandem repeat (STR) marker selection and primer design for loci of interest. It was followed by a family haplotyping, after which an in vitro fertilization preimplantation genetic testing (IVF-PGT) cycle was carried out. A total of 62 embryos were retrieved from nine couples with a confirmed single gene disorder being transmitted in their family with various inheritance traits—autosomal dominant (genes—ACTA2, HTT, KRT14), autosomal recessive (genes—ALOX12B, TPP1, GLB1) and X-linked (genes—MTM1, DMD). Whole genome amplification (WGA) for the day 5 embryo trophectoderm single biopsies was carried out by multiple displacement amplification (MDA) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technology OmniPlex and was used for direct (Sanger sequencing, fragment size analysis, SNaPshot) and indirect mutation assessment (STR marker haplotyping), and embryo aneuploidy testing by array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH). RESULTS: Family haplotyping revealed informative/semi-informative microsatellite markers for all clinical cases for all types of inheritance. Indirect testing gave a persuasive conclusion for all embryos assessed, which was confirmed through direct testing. The overall allele dropout (ADO) rate was higher for PCR-based WGA, and MDA shows a better genomic recovery scale. Five euploid embryos were subjected to elective single embryo transfer (eSET), which resulted in four clinical pregnancies and birth of two healthy children, which proved free of disease causative variants running in the family postnataly. CONCLUSIONS: A developed multifactor PGT protocol can be adapted and applied to virtually any genetic condition and is capable of improving single gene disorder preimplantation genetic testing in a patient-tailored manner thus increasing pregnancy rates, saving costs and increasing patient reliability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10815-018-1187-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6086788 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60867882018-08-23 Performance comparison of two whole genome amplification techniques in frame of multifactor preimplantation genetic testing Volozonoka, Ludmila Perminov, Dmitry Korņejeva, Liene Alkšere, Baiba Novikova, Natālija Pīmane, Evija Jokste Blumberga, Arita Kempa, Inga Miskova, Anna Gailīte, Linda Fodina, Violeta J Assist Reprod Genet Genetics PURPOSE: To compare multiple displacement amplification and OmniPlex whole genome amplification technique performance during array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH), Sanger sequencing, SNaPshot and fragment size analysis downstream applications in frame of multifactor embryo preimplantation genetic testing. METHODS: Preclinical workup included linked short tandem repeat (STR) marker selection and primer design for loci of interest. It was followed by a family haplotyping, after which an in vitro fertilization preimplantation genetic testing (IVF-PGT) cycle was carried out. A total of 62 embryos were retrieved from nine couples with a confirmed single gene disorder being transmitted in their family with various inheritance traits—autosomal dominant (genes—ACTA2, HTT, KRT14), autosomal recessive (genes—ALOX12B, TPP1, GLB1) and X-linked (genes—MTM1, DMD). Whole genome amplification (WGA) for the day 5 embryo trophectoderm single biopsies was carried out by multiple displacement amplification (MDA) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technology OmniPlex and was used for direct (Sanger sequencing, fragment size analysis, SNaPshot) and indirect mutation assessment (STR marker haplotyping), and embryo aneuploidy testing by array comparative genome hybridization (aCGH). RESULTS: Family haplotyping revealed informative/semi-informative microsatellite markers for all clinical cases for all types of inheritance. Indirect testing gave a persuasive conclusion for all embryos assessed, which was confirmed through direct testing. The overall allele dropout (ADO) rate was higher for PCR-based WGA, and MDA shows a better genomic recovery scale. Five euploid embryos were subjected to elective single embryo transfer (eSET), which resulted in four clinical pregnancies and birth of two healthy children, which proved free of disease causative variants running in the family postnataly. CONCLUSIONS: A developed multifactor PGT protocol can be adapted and applied to virtually any genetic condition and is capable of improving single gene disorder preimplantation genetic testing in a patient-tailored manner thus increasing pregnancy rates, saving costs and increasing patient reliability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10815-018-1187-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-04-23 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6086788/ /pubmed/29687370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1187-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Volozonoka, Ludmila Perminov, Dmitry Korņejeva, Liene Alkšere, Baiba Novikova, Natālija Pīmane, Evija Jokste Blumberga, Arita Kempa, Inga Miskova, Anna Gailīte, Linda Fodina, Violeta Performance comparison of two whole genome amplification techniques in frame of multifactor preimplantation genetic testing |
title | Performance comparison of two whole genome amplification techniques in frame of multifactor preimplantation genetic testing |
title_full | Performance comparison of two whole genome amplification techniques in frame of multifactor preimplantation genetic testing |
title_fullStr | Performance comparison of two whole genome amplification techniques in frame of multifactor preimplantation genetic testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance comparison of two whole genome amplification techniques in frame of multifactor preimplantation genetic testing |
title_short | Performance comparison of two whole genome amplification techniques in frame of multifactor preimplantation genetic testing |
title_sort | performance comparison of two whole genome amplification techniques in frame of multifactor preimplantation genetic testing |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6086788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29687370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1187-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT volozonokaludmila performancecomparisonoftwowholegenomeamplificationtechniquesinframeofmultifactorpreimplantationgenetictesting AT perminovdmitry performancecomparisonoftwowholegenomeamplificationtechniquesinframeofmultifactorpreimplantationgenetictesting AT kornejevaliene performancecomparisonoftwowholegenomeamplificationtechniquesinframeofmultifactorpreimplantationgenetictesting AT alkserebaiba performancecomparisonoftwowholegenomeamplificationtechniquesinframeofmultifactorpreimplantationgenetictesting AT novikovanatalija performancecomparisonoftwowholegenomeamplificationtechniquesinframeofmultifactorpreimplantationgenetictesting AT pimaneevijajokste performancecomparisonoftwowholegenomeamplificationtechniquesinframeofmultifactorpreimplantationgenetictesting AT blumbergaarita performancecomparisonoftwowholegenomeamplificationtechniquesinframeofmultifactorpreimplantationgenetictesting AT kempainga performancecomparisonoftwowholegenomeamplificationtechniquesinframeofmultifactorpreimplantationgenetictesting AT miskovaanna performancecomparisonoftwowholegenomeamplificationtechniquesinframeofmultifactorpreimplantationgenetictesting AT gailitelinda performancecomparisonoftwowholegenomeamplificationtechniquesinframeofmultifactorpreimplantationgenetictesting AT fodinavioleta performancecomparisonoftwowholegenomeamplificationtechniquesinframeofmultifactorpreimplantationgenetictesting |