Cargando…

Performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback systems in a long-distance train with distributed traction

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is common in public locations, including public transportation sites. Feedback devices are increasingly being used to improve chest-compression quality. However, their performance during public transportation has not been studied yet. OBJECTIVE: To test two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: González-Otero, Digna M., Ruiz de Gauna, Sofía, Ruiz, Jesus, Rivero, Raquel, Gutierrez, J.J., Saiz, Purificación, Russell, James K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6087461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29710761
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/THC-181241
_version_ 1783346691237216256
author González-Otero, Digna M.
Ruiz de Gauna, Sofía
Ruiz, Jesus
Rivero, Raquel
Gutierrez, J.J.
Saiz, Purificación
Russell, James K.
author_facet González-Otero, Digna M.
Ruiz de Gauna, Sofía
Ruiz, Jesus
Rivero, Raquel
Gutierrez, J.J.
Saiz, Purificación
Russell, James K.
author_sort González-Otero, Digna M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is common in public locations, including public transportation sites. Feedback devices are increasingly being used to improve chest-compression quality. However, their performance during public transportation has not been studied yet. OBJECTIVE: To test two CPR feedback devices representative of the current technologies (accelerometer and electromag- netic-field) in a long-distance train. METHODS: Volunteers applied compressions on a manikin during the train route using both feedback devices. Depth and rate measurements computed by the devices were compared to the gold-standard values. RESULTS: Sixty-four 4-min records were acquired. The accelerometer-based device provided visual help in all experiments. Median absolute errors in depth and rate were 2.4 mm and 1.3 compressions per minute (cpm) during conventional speed, and 2.5 mm and 1.2 cpm during high speed. The electromagnetic-field-based device never provided CPR feedback; alert messages were shown instead. However, measurements were stored in its internal memory. Absolute errors for depth and rate were 2.6 mm and 0.7 cpm during conventional speed, and 2.6 mm and 0.7 cpm during high speed. CONCLUSIONS: Both devices were accurate despite the accelerations and the electromagnetic interferences induced by the train. However, the electromagnetic-field-based device would require modifications to avoid excessive alerts impeding feedback.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6087461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60874612018-08-13 Performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback systems in a long-distance train with distributed traction González-Otero, Digna M. Ruiz de Gauna, Sofía Ruiz, Jesus Rivero, Raquel Gutierrez, J.J. Saiz, Purificación Russell, James K. Technol Health Care Short Communication BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is common in public locations, including public transportation sites. Feedback devices are increasingly being used to improve chest-compression quality. However, their performance during public transportation has not been studied yet. OBJECTIVE: To test two CPR feedback devices representative of the current technologies (accelerometer and electromag- netic-field) in a long-distance train. METHODS: Volunteers applied compressions on a manikin during the train route using both feedback devices. Depth and rate measurements computed by the devices were compared to the gold-standard values. RESULTS: Sixty-four 4-min records were acquired. The accelerometer-based device provided visual help in all experiments. Median absolute errors in depth and rate were 2.4 mm and 1.3 compressions per minute (cpm) during conventional speed, and 2.5 mm and 1.2 cpm during high speed. The electromagnetic-field-based device never provided CPR feedback; alert messages were shown instead. However, measurements were stored in its internal memory. Absolute errors for depth and rate were 2.6 mm and 0.7 cpm during conventional speed, and 2.6 mm and 0.7 cpm during high speed. CONCLUSIONS: Both devices were accurate despite the accelerations and the electromagnetic interferences induced by the train. However, the electromagnetic-field-based device would require modifications to avoid excessive alerts impeding feedback. IOS Press 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6087461/ /pubmed/29710761 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/THC-181241 Text en © 2018 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is published online with Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Short Communication
González-Otero, Digna M.
Ruiz de Gauna, Sofía
Ruiz, Jesus
Rivero, Raquel
Gutierrez, J.J.
Saiz, Purificación
Russell, James K.
Performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback systems in a long-distance train with distributed traction
title Performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback systems in a long-distance train with distributed traction
title_full Performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback systems in a long-distance train with distributed traction
title_fullStr Performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback systems in a long-distance train with distributed traction
title_full_unstemmed Performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback systems in a long-distance train with distributed traction
title_short Performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback systems in a long-distance train with distributed traction
title_sort performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback systems in a long-distance train with distributed traction
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6087461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29710761
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/THC-181241
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezoterodignam performanceofcardiopulmonaryresuscitationfeedbacksystemsinalongdistancetrainwithdistributedtraction
AT ruizdegaunasofia performanceofcardiopulmonaryresuscitationfeedbacksystemsinalongdistancetrainwithdistributedtraction
AT ruizjesus performanceofcardiopulmonaryresuscitationfeedbacksystemsinalongdistancetrainwithdistributedtraction
AT riveroraquel performanceofcardiopulmonaryresuscitationfeedbacksystemsinalongdistancetrainwithdistributedtraction
AT gutierrezjj performanceofcardiopulmonaryresuscitationfeedbacksystemsinalongdistancetrainwithdistributedtraction
AT saizpurificacion performanceofcardiopulmonaryresuscitationfeedbacksystemsinalongdistancetrainwithdistributedtraction
AT russelljamesk performanceofcardiopulmonaryresuscitationfeedbacksystemsinalongdistancetrainwithdistributedtraction