Cargando…
Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis
Background: Several neoadjuvant treatments are available for patients with resectable gastroesophageal cancer. We did a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare available treatments, summarizing the direct and indirect evidence. Method: We searched relevant databases for randomized controlled...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6087755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127746 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00872 |
_version_ | 1783346731413405696 |
---|---|
author | Cai, Zhaolun Yin, Yiqiong Zhao, Zhou Xin, Chunyu Cai, Zhaohui Yin, Yuan Shen, Chaoyong Yin, Xiaonan Wang, Jian Chen, Zhixin Zhou, Ye Zhang, Bo |
author_facet | Cai, Zhaolun Yin, Yiqiong Zhao, Zhou Xin, Chunyu Cai, Zhaohui Yin, Yuan Shen, Chaoyong Yin, Xiaonan Wang, Jian Chen, Zhixin Zhou, Ye Zhang, Bo |
author_sort | Cai, Zhaolun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Several neoadjuvant treatments are available for patients with resectable gastroesophageal cancer. We did a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare available treatments, summarizing the direct and indirect evidence. Method: We searched relevant databases for randomized controlled trials of neoadjuvant treatments for resectable gastroesophageal cancer which compared two or more of the following treatments: surgery alone, perioperative docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FLOT), and neoadjuvant treatments listed in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. Then we performed a NMA to summarize the direct and indirect evidence to estimate the relative efficacy for outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival and R0 resection rate. We calculated odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) for dichotomous data and time-to-event data, respectively. We also calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of each intervention to obtain a hierarchy of treatments. Result: Eight eligible trials (2434 patients) were included in our NMA. The treatment with the highest probability of benefit on OS as compared with surgery alone was perioperative FLOT [HR = 0.58 with 95% CrI: (0.43, 0.78), SUCRA = 93%], followed by preoperative radiotherapy, paclitaxel, and carboplatin (RT/PC) [HR = 0.68 with 95% CrI: (0.53, 0.87), SUCRA = 72%], perioperative cisplatin with fluorouracil (CF) [HR = 0.70 with 95% CrI: (0.51, 0.95), SUCRA = 68%], and perioperative epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine (ECF/ECX) [HR = 0.75 with 95% CrI: (0.60, 0.94), SUCRA = 56%]. Conclusion: Compared with surgery alone, perioperative CF, perioperative ECF/ECX, perioperative FLOT, and preoperative RT/PC significantly improved survival. Perioperative FLOT is likely to be the most effective neoadjuvant treatment for the disease. Further clinical studies are needed and justified. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6087755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60877552018-08-20 Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis Cai, Zhaolun Yin, Yiqiong Zhao, Zhou Xin, Chunyu Cai, Zhaohui Yin, Yuan Shen, Chaoyong Yin, Xiaonan Wang, Jian Chen, Zhixin Zhou, Ye Zhang, Bo Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Several neoadjuvant treatments are available for patients with resectable gastroesophageal cancer. We did a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare available treatments, summarizing the direct and indirect evidence. Method: We searched relevant databases for randomized controlled trials of neoadjuvant treatments for resectable gastroesophageal cancer which compared two or more of the following treatments: surgery alone, perioperative docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FLOT), and neoadjuvant treatments listed in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. Then we performed a NMA to summarize the direct and indirect evidence to estimate the relative efficacy for outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival and R0 resection rate. We calculated odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) for dichotomous data and time-to-event data, respectively. We also calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of each intervention to obtain a hierarchy of treatments. Result: Eight eligible trials (2434 patients) were included in our NMA. The treatment with the highest probability of benefit on OS as compared with surgery alone was perioperative FLOT [HR = 0.58 with 95% CrI: (0.43, 0.78), SUCRA = 93%], followed by preoperative radiotherapy, paclitaxel, and carboplatin (RT/PC) [HR = 0.68 with 95% CrI: (0.53, 0.87), SUCRA = 72%], perioperative cisplatin with fluorouracil (CF) [HR = 0.70 with 95% CrI: (0.51, 0.95), SUCRA = 68%], and perioperative epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine (ECF/ECX) [HR = 0.75 with 95% CrI: (0.60, 0.94), SUCRA = 56%]. Conclusion: Compared with surgery alone, perioperative CF, perioperative ECF/ECX, perioperative FLOT, and preoperative RT/PC significantly improved survival. Perioperative FLOT is likely to be the most effective neoadjuvant treatment for the disease. Further clinical studies are needed and justified. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6087755/ /pubmed/30127746 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00872 Text en Copyright © 2018 Cai, Yin, Zhao, Xin, Cai, Yin, Shen, Yin, Wang, Chen, Zhou and Zhang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Cai, Zhaolun Yin, Yiqiong Zhao, Zhou Xin, Chunyu Cai, Zhaohui Yin, Yuan Shen, Chaoyong Yin, Xiaonan Wang, Jian Chen, Zhixin Zhou, Ye Zhang, Bo Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title | Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of neoadjuvant treatments for resectable gastroesophageal cancer: a network meta-analysis |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6087755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127746 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00872 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caizhaolun comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis AT yinyiqiong comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis AT zhaozhou comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis AT xinchunyu comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis AT caizhaohui comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis AT yinyuan comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis AT shenchaoyong comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis AT yinxiaonan comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis AT wangjian comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis AT chenzhixin comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis AT zhouye comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis AT zhangbo comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis |