Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Several neoadjuvant treatments are available for patients with resectable gastroesophageal cancer. We did a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare available treatments, summarizing the direct and indirect evidence. Method: We searched relevant databases for randomized controlled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Zhaolun, Yin, Yiqiong, Zhao, Zhou, Xin, Chunyu, Cai, Zhaohui, Yin, Yuan, Shen, Chaoyong, Yin, Xiaonan, Wang, Jian, Chen, Zhixin, Zhou, Ye, Zhang, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6087755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127746
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00872
_version_ 1783346731413405696
author Cai, Zhaolun
Yin, Yiqiong
Zhao, Zhou
Xin, Chunyu
Cai, Zhaohui
Yin, Yuan
Shen, Chaoyong
Yin, Xiaonan
Wang, Jian
Chen, Zhixin
Zhou, Ye
Zhang, Bo
author_facet Cai, Zhaolun
Yin, Yiqiong
Zhao, Zhou
Xin, Chunyu
Cai, Zhaohui
Yin, Yuan
Shen, Chaoyong
Yin, Xiaonan
Wang, Jian
Chen, Zhixin
Zhou, Ye
Zhang, Bo
author_sort Cai, Zhaolun
collection PubMed
description Background: Several neoadjuvant treatments are available for patients with resectable gastroesophageal cancer. We did a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare available treatments, summarizing the direct and indirect evidence. Method: We searched relevant databases for randomized controlled trials of neoadjuvant treatments for resectable gastroesophageal cancer which compared two or more of the following treatments: surgery alone, perioperative docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FLOT), and neoadjuvant treatments listed in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. Then we performed a NMA to summarize the direct and indirect evidence to estimate the relative efficacy for outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival and R0 resection rate. We calculated odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) for dichotomous data and time-to-event data, respectively. We also calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of each intervention to obtain a hierarchy of treatments. Result: Eight eligible trials (2434 patients) were included in our NMA. The treatment with the highest probability of benefit on OS as compared with surgery alone was perioperative FLOT [HR = 0.58 with 95% CrI: (0.43, 0.78), SUCRA = 93%], followed by preoperative radiotherapy, paclitaxel, and carboplatin (RT/PC) [HR = 0.68 with 95% CrI: (0.53, 0.87), SUCRA = 72%], perioperative cisplatin with fluorouracil (CF) [HR = 0.70 with 95% CrI: (0.51, 0.95), SUCRA = 68%], and perioperative epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine (ECF/ECX) [HR = 0.75 with 95% CrI: (0.60, 0.94), SUCRA = 56%]. Conclusion: Compared with surgery alone, perioperative CF, perioperative ECF/ECX, perioperative FLOT, and preoperative RT/PC significantly improved survival. Perioperative FLOT is likely to be the most effective neoadjuvant treatment for the disease. Further clinical studies are needed and justified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6087755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60877552018-08-20 Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis Cai, Zhaolun Yin, Yiqiong Zhao, Zhou Xin, Chunyu Cai, Zhaohui Yin, Yuan Shen, Chaoyong Yin, Xiaonan Wang, Jian Chen, Zhixin Zhou, Ye Zhang, Bo Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Several neoadjuvant treatments are available for patients with resectable gastroesophageal cancer. We did a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare available treatments, summarizing the direct and indirect evidence. Method: We searched relevant databases for randomized controlled trials of neoadjuvant treatments for resectable gastroesophageal cancer which compared two or more of the following treatments: surgery alone, perioperative docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FLOT), and neoadjuvant treatments listed in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. Then we performed a NMA to summarize the direct and indirect evidence to estimate the relative efficacy for outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival and R0 resection rate. We calculated odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) for dichotomous data and time-to-event data, respectively. We also calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of each intervention to obtain a hierarchy of treatments. Result: Eight eligible trials (2434 patients) were included in our NMA. The treatment with the highest probability of benefit on OS as compared with surgery alone was perioperative FLOT [HR = 0.58 with 95% CrI: (0.43, 0.78), SUCRA = 93%], followed by preoperative radiotherapy, paclitaxel, and carboplatin (RT/PC) [HR = 0.68 with 95% CrI: (0.53, 0.87), SUCRA = 72%], perioperative cisplatin with fluorouracil (CF) [HR = 0.70 with 95% CrI: (0.51, 0.95), SUCRA = 68%], and perioperative epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine (ECF/ECX) [HR = 0.75 with 95% CrI: (0.60, 0.94), SUCRA = 56%]. Conclusion: Compared with surgery alone, perioperative CF, perioperative ECF/ECX, perioperative FLOT, and preoperative RT/PC significantly improved survival. Perioperative FLOT is likely to be the most effective neoadjuvant treatment for the disease. Further clinical studies are needed and justified. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6087755/ /pubmed/30127746 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00872 Text en Copyright © 2018 Cai, Yin, Zhao, Xin, Cai, Yin, Shen, Yin, Wang, Chen, Zhou and Zhang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Cai, Zhaolun
Yin, Yiqiong
Zhao, Zhou
Xin, Chunyu
Cai, Zhaohui
Yin, Yuan
Shen, Chaoyong
Yin, Xiaonan
Wang, Jian
Chen, Zhixin
Zhou, Ye
Zhang, Bo
Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis
title Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Treatments for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparative effectiveness of neoadjuvant treatments for resectable gastroesophageal cancer: a network meta-analysis
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6087755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127746
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00872
work_keys_str_mv AT caizhaolun comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT yinyiqiong comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhaozhou comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT xinchunyu comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT caizhaohui comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT yinyuan comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT shenchaoyong comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT yinxiaonan comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangjian comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenzhixin comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhouye comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangbo comparativeeffectivenessofneoadjuvanttreatmentsforresectablegastroesophagealcanceranetworkmetaanalysis