Cargando…
Association between miR-124-1 rs531564 polymorphism and risk of cancer: An updated meta-analysis of case-control studies
Many studies examined the association between miR-124-1 rs531564 polymorphism and the risk of some human cancers, but the findings remain controversial. This update meta-analysis aimed to validate the association between rs531564 polymorphism of miR-124-1 and cancer risk. Eligible studies including...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6088220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30108465 http://dx.doi.org/10.17179/excli2018-1419 |
_version_ | 1783346806992666624 |
---|---|
author | Moazeni-Roodi, Abdolkarim Hashemi, Mohammad |
author_facet | Moazeni-Roodi, Abdolkarim Hashemi, Mohammad |
author_sort | Moazeni-Roodi, Abdolkarim |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many studies examined the association between miR-124-1 rs531564 polymorphism and the risk of some human cancers, but the findings remain controversial. This update meta-analysis aimed to validate the association between rs531564 polymorphism of miR-124-1 and cancer risk. Eligible studies including 6,502 cancer cases and 7,213 controls were documented by searching Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Google scholar databases. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to quantitatively evaluate the association between rs531564 variant and cancer risk. The results indicated that rs531564 variant significantly decreased the risk of cancer in homozygous codominant (OR=0.54, 95 % CI=0.43-0.69, p<0.00001, GG vs CC), dominant (OR=0.84, 95 % CI=0.72-0.99, p=0.03, CG+GG vs CC), recessive (OR=0.65, 95 % CI=0.54-0.78, p<0.00001, GG vs CG+CC), and allele (OR=0.84, 95 % CI=0.73-0.96, p=0.008, G vs C) genetic model. Stratified analysis by cancer type revealed that rs531564 variant was associated with gastric cancer, cervical cancer, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and colorectal cancer risk. In summary, the findings of this meta-analysis support an association between miR-124-1 rs531564 polymorphism and cancer risk. Larger and well-designed studies are required to estimate this association in detail. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6088220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60882202018-08-14 Association between miR-124-1 rs531564 polymorphism and risk of cancer: An updated meta-analysis of case-control studies Moazeni-Roodi, Abdolkarim Hashemi, Mohammad EXCLI J Original Article Many studies examined the association between miR-124-1 rs531564 polymorphism and the risk of some human cancers, but the findings remain controversial. This update meta-analysis aimed to validate the association between rs531564 polymorphism of miR-124-1 and cancer risk. Eligible studies including 6,502 cancer cases and 7,213 controls were documented by searching Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Google scholar databases. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to quantitatively evaluate the association between rs531564 variant and cancer risk. The results indicated that rs531564 variant significantly decreased the risk of cancer in homozygous codominant (OR=0.54, 95 % CI=0.43-0.69, p<0.00001, GG vs CC), dominant (OR=0.84, 95 % CI=0.72-0.99, p=0.03, CG+GG vs CC), recessive (OR=0.65, 95 % CI=0.54-0.78, p<0.00001, GG vs CG+CC), and allele (OR=0.84, 95 % CI=0.73-0.96, p=0.008, G vs C) genetic model. Stratified analysis by cancer type revealed that rs531564 variant was associated with gastric cancer, cervical cancer, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and colorectal cancer risk. In summary, the findings of this meta-analysis support an association between miR-124-1 rs531564 polymorphism and cancer risk. Larger and well-designed studies are required to estimate this association in detail. Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6088220/ /pubmed/30108465 http://dx.doi.org/10.17179/excli2018-1419 Text en Copyright © 2018 Moazeni-Roodi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Moazeni-Roodi, Abdolkarim Hashemi, Mohammad Association between miR-124-1 rs531564 polymorphism and risk of cancer: An updated meta-analysis of case-control studies |
title | Association between miR-124-1 rs531564 polymorphism and risk of cancer: An updated meta-analysis of case-control studies |
title_full | Association between miR-124-1 rs531564 polymorphism and risk of cancer: An updated meta-analysis of case-control studies |
title_fullStr | Association between miR-124-1 rs531564 polymorphism and risk of cancer: An updated meta-analysis of case-control studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Association between miR-124-1 rs531564 polymorphism and risk of cancer: An updated meta-analysis of case-control studies |
title_short | Association between miR-124-1 rs531564 polymorphism and risk of cancer: An updated meta-analysis of case-control studies |
title_sort | association between mir-124-1 rs531564 polymorphism and risk of cancer: an updated meta-analysis of case-control studies |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6088220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30108465 http://dx.doi.org/10.17179/excli2018-1419 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moazeniroodiabdolkarim associationbetweenmir1241rs531564polymorphismandriskofcanceranupdatedmetaanalysisofcasecontrolstudies AT hashemimohammad associationbetweenmir1241rs531564polymorphismandriskofcanceranupdatedmetaanalysisofcasecontrolstudies |