Cargando…
A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices
Cognitive neuroscience questions are commonly tested with experiments that involve a cohort of subjects. The cohort can consist of a handful of subjects for small studies to hundreds or thousands of subjects in open datasets. While there exist various online resources to get started with the analysi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6088222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00530 |
_version_ | 1783346807476060160 |
---|---|
author | Jas, Mainak Larson, Eric Engemann, Denis A. Leppäkangas, Jaakko Taulu, Samu Hämäläinen, Matti Gramfort, Alexandre |
author_facet | Jas, Mainak Larson, Eric Engemann, Denis A. Leppäkangas, Jaakko Taulu, Samu Hämäläinen, Matti Gramfort, Alexandre |
author_sort | Jas, Mainak |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cognitive neuroscience questions are commonly tested with experiments that involve a cohort of subjects. The cohort can consist of a handful of subjects for small studies to hundreds or thousands of subjects in open datasets. While there exist various online resources to get started with the analysis of magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography (EEG) data, such educational materials are usually restricted to the analysis of a single subject. This is in part because data from larger group studies are harder to share, but also analyses of such data often require subject-specific decisions which are hard to document. This work presents the results obtained by the reanalysis of an open dataset from Wakeman and Henson (2015) using the MNE software package. The analysis covers preprocessing steps, quality assurance steps, sensor space analysis of evoked responses, source localization, and statistics in both sensor and source space. Results with possible alternative strategies are presented and discussed at different stages such as the use of high-pass filtering versus baseline correction, tSSS vs. SSS, the use of a minimum norm inverse vs. LCMV beamformer, and the use of univariate or multivariate statistics. This aims to provide a comparative study of different stages of M/EEG analysis pipeline on the same dataset, with open access to all of the scripts necessary to reproduce this analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6088222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60882222018-08-20 A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices Jas, Mainak Larson, Eric Engemann, Denis A. Leppäkangas, Jaakko Taulu, Samu Hämäläinen, Matti Gramfort, Alexandre Front Neurosci Neuroscience Cognitive neuroscience questions are commonly tested with experiments that involve a cohort of subjects. The cohort can consist of a handful of subjects for small studies to hundreds or thousands of subjects in open datasets. While there exist various online resources to get started with the analysis of magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography (EEG) data, such educational materials are usually restricted to the analysis of a single subject. This is in part because data from larger group studies are harder to share, but also analyses of such data often require subject-specific decisions which are hard to document. This work presents the results obtained by the reanalysis of an open dataset from Wakeman and Henson (2015) using the MNE software package. The analysis covers preprocessing steps, quality assurance steps, sensor space analysis of evoked responses, source localization, and statistics in both sensor and source space. Results with possible alternative strategies are presented and discussed at different stages such as the use of high-pass filtering versus baseline correction, tSSS vs. SSS, the use of a minimum norm inverse vs. LCMV beamformer, and the use of univariate or multivariate statistics. This aims to provide a comparative study of different stages of M/EEG analysis pipeline on the same dataset, with open access to all of the scripts necessary to reproduce this analysis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6088222/ /pubmed/30127712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00530 Text en Copyright © 2018 Jas, Larson, Engemann, Leppäkangas, Taulu, Hämäläinen and Gramfort. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Jas, Mainak Larson, Eric Engemann, Denis A. Leppäkangas, Jaakko Taulu, Samu Hämäläinen, Matti Gramfort, Alexandre A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices |
title | A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices |
title_full | A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices |
title_fullStr | A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices |
title_full_unstemmed | A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices |
title_short | A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices |
title_sort | reproducible meg/eeg group study with the mne software: recommendations, quality assessments, and good practices |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6088222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00530 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jasmainak areproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices AT larsoneric areproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices AT engemanndenisa areproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices AT leppakangasjaakko areproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices AT taulusamu areproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices AT hamalainenmatti areproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices AT gramfortalexandre areproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices AT jasmainak reproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices AT larsoneric reproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices AT engemanndenisa reproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices AT leppakangasjaakko reproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices AT taulusamu reproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices AT hamalainenmatti reproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices AT gramfortalexandre reproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices |