Cargando…

A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices

Cognitive neuroscience questions are commonly tested with experiments that involve a cohort of subjects. The cohort can consist of a handful of subjects for small studies to hundreds or thousands of subjects in open datasets. While there exist various online resources to get started with the analysi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jas, Mainak, Larson, Eric, Engemann, Denis A., Leppäkangas, Jaakko, Taulu, Samu, Hämäläinen, Matti, Gramfort, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6088222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00530
_version_ 1783346807476060160
author Jas, Mainak
Larson, Eric
Engemann, Denis A.
Leppäkangas, Jaakko
Taulu, Samu
Hämäläinen, Matti
Gramfort, Alexandre
author_facet Jas, Mainak
Larson, Eric
Engemann, Denis A.
Leppäkangas, Jaakko
Taulu, Samu
Hämäläinen, Matti
Gramfort, Alexandre
author_sort Jas, Mainak
collection PubMed
description Cognitive neuroscience questions are commonly tested with experiments that involve a cohort of subjects. The cohort can consist of a handful of subjects for small studies to hundreds or thousands of subjects in open datasets. While there exist various online resources to get started with the analysis of magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography (EEG) data, such educational materials are usually restricted to the analysis of a single subject. This is in part because data from larger group studies are harder to share, but also analyses of such data often require subject-specific decisions which are hard to document. This work presents the results obtained by the reanalysis of an open dataset from Wakeman and Henson (2015) using the MNE software package. The analysis covers preprocessing steps, quality assurance steps, sensor space analysis of evoked responses, source localization, and statistics in both sensor and source space. Results with possible alternative strategies are presented and discussed at different stages such as the use of high-pass filtering versus baseline correction, tSSS vs. SSS, the use of a minimum norm inverse vs. LCMV beamformer, and the use of univariate or multivariate statistics. This aims to provide a comparative study of different stages of M/EEG analysis pipeline on the same dataset, with open access to all of the scripts necessary to reproduce this analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6088222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60882222018-08-20 A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices Jas, Mainak Larson, Eric Engemann, Denis A. Leppäkangas, Jaakko Taulu, Samu Hämäläinen, Matti Gramfort, Alexandre Front Neurosci Neuroscience Cognitive neuroscience questions are commonly tested with experiments that involve a cohort of subjects. The cohort can consist of a handful of subjects for small studies to hundreds or thousands of subjects in open datasets. While there exist various online resources to get started with the analysis of magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography (EEG) data, such educational materials are usually restricted to the analysis of a single subject. This is in part because data from larger group studies are harder to share, but also analyses of such data often require subject-specific decisions which are hard to document. This work presents the results obtained by the reanalysis of an open dataset from Wakeman and Henson (2015) using the MNE software package. The analysis covers preprocessing steps, quality assurance steps, sensor space analysis of evoked responses, source localization, and statistics in both sensor and source space. Results with possible alternative strategies are presented and discussed at different stages such as the use of high-pass filtering versus baseline correction, tSSS vs. SSS, the use of a minimum norm inverse vs. LCMV beamformer, and the use of univariate or multivariate statistics. This aims to provide a comparative study of different stages of M/EEG analysis pipeline on the same dataset, with open access to all of the scripts necessary to reproduce this analysis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6088222/ /pubmed/30127712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00530 Text en Copyright © 2018 Jas, Larson, Engemann, Leppäkangas, Taulu, Hämäläinen and Gramfort. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Jas, Mainak
Larson, Eric
Engemann, Denis A.
Leppäkangas, Jaakko
Taulu, Samu
Hämäläinen, Matti
Gramfort, Alexandre
A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices
title A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices
title_full A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices
title_fullStr A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices
title_full_unstemmed A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices
title_short A Reproducible MEG/EEG Group Study With the MNE Software: Recommendations, Quality Assessments, and Good Practices
title_sort reproducible meg/eeg group study with the mne software: recommendations, quality assessments, and good practices
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6088222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00530
work_keys_str_mv AT jasmainak areproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices
AT larsoneric areproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices
AT engemanndenisa areproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices
AT leppakangasjaakko areproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices
AT taulusamu areproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices
AT hamalainenmatti areproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices
AT gramfortalexandre areproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices
AT jasmainak reproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices
AT larsoneric reproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices
AT engemanndenisa reproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices
AT leppakangasjaakko reproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices
AT taulusamu reproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices
AT hamalainenmatti reproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices
AT gramfortalexandre reproduciblemegeeggroupstudywiththemnesoftwarerecommendationsqualityassessmentsandgoodpractices