Cargando…

The efficacy of sodium azulene sulfonate L-glutamine for managing chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in cancer patients: a prospective comparative study

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of sodium azulene sulfonate L-glutamine (GA) in treating oral mucositis caused by the administration of anticancer agents has not been previously elucidated. Therefore, this prospective comparative study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of GA in treating oral mucositis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nihei, Satoru, Sato, Junya, Komatsu, Hideaki, Ishida, Kazushige, Kimura, Toshimoto, Tomita, Takashi, Kudo, Kenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6088392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-018-0114-2
_version_ 1783346822988693504
author Nihei, Satoru
Sato, Junya
Komatsu, Hideaki
Ishida, Kazushige
Kimura, Toshimoto
Tomita, Takashi
Kudo, Kenzo
author_facet Nihei, Satoru
Sato, Junya
Komatsu, Hideaki
Ishida, Kazushige
Kimura, Toshimoto
Tomita, Takashi
Kudo, Kenzo
author_sort Nihei, Satoru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The efficacy of sodium azulene sulfonate L-glutamine (GA) in treating oral mucositis caused by the administration of anticancer agents has not been previously elucidated. Therefore, this prospective comparative study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of GA in treating oral mucositis caused by chemotherapy regimens involving fluorinated pyrimidine anticancer drugs. METHODS: The subjects of this study were patients with oral mucositis of grade 2 or higher while on outpatient chemotherapy regimens involving fluorinated pyrimidine anticancer drugs for colorectal or breast cancer. The subjects were randomly divided into a group that received GA (the GA group) or a group that did not receive GA (the control group) by using the closed-envelope method. GA was administered three times a day every day from the first day of the regimen until the final day. The primary endpoint was the development of oral mucositis of grade 2 or higher. The secondary endpoint was the severity of oral pain, which was judged using an 11-stage numerical rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with oral mucositis of grade 2 or higher was 32.4% in the GA group and 57.6% in the control group. The GA group had a significantly lower frequency of occurrence. The changes in the NRS scores before and after the trial began were − 2.9 ± 0.6 in the GA group and − 1.2 ± 0.5 in the control group. The NRS score decreased more significantly in the GA group than in the control group (P = 0.046). One patient stopped GA treatment voluntarily due to nausea; other than nausea, no GA-related side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: GA protects against oral mucositis and reduces the severity of prevailing oral mucositis symptoms. Our findings indicate that GA is a highly safe and convenient drug.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6088392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60883922018-08-17 The efficacy of sodium azulene sulfonate L-glutamine for managing chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in cancer patients: a prospective comparative study Nihei, Satoru Sato, Junya Komatsu, Hideaki Ishida, Kazushige Kimura, Toshimoto Tomita, Takashi Kudo, Kenzo J Pharm Health Care Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: The efficacy of sodium azulene sulfonate L-glutamine (GA) in treating oral mucositis caused by the administration of anticancer agents has not been previously elucidated. Therefore, this prospective comparative study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of GA in treating oral mucositis caused by chemotherapy regimens involving fluorinated pyrimidine anticancer drugs. METHODS: The subjects of this study were patients with oral mucositis of grade 2 or higher while on outpatient chemotherapy regimens involving fluorinated pyrimidine anticancer drugs for colorectal or breast cancer. The subjects were randomly divided into a group that received GA (the GA group) or a group that did not receive GA (the control group) by using the closed-envelope method. GA was administered three times a day every day from the first day of the regimen until the final day. The primary endpoint was the development of oral mucositis of grade 2 or higher. The secondary endpoint was the severity of oral pain, which was judged using an 11-stage numerical rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with oral mucositis of grade 2 or higher was 32.4% in the GA group and 57.6% in the control group. The GA group had a significantly lower frequency of occurrence. The changes in the NRS scores before and after the trial began were − 2.9 ± 0.6 in the GA group and − 1.2 ± 0.5 in the control group. The NRS score decreased more significantly in the GA group than in the control group (P = 0.046). One patient stopped GA treatment voluntarily due to nausea; other than nausea, no GA-related side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: GA protects against oral mucositis and reduces the severity of prevailing oral mucositis symptoms. Our findings indicate that GA is a highly safe and convenient drug. BioMed Central 2018-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6088392/ /pubmed/30123519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-018-0114-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nihei, Satoru
Sato, Junya
Komatsu, Hideaki
Ishida, Kazushige
Kimura, Toshimoto
Tomita, Takashi
Kudo, Kenzo
The efficacy of sodium azulene sulfonate L-glutamine for managing chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in cancer patients: a prospective comparative study
title The efficacy of sodium azulene sulfonate L-glutamine for managing chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in cancer patients: a prospective comparative study
title_full The efficacy of sodium azulene sulfonate L-glutamine for managing chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in cancer patients: a prospective comparative study
title_fullStr The efficacy of sodium azulene sulfonate L-glutamine for managing chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in cancer patients: a prospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of sodium azulene sulfonate L-glutamine for managing chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in cancer patients: a prospective comparative study
title_short The efficacy of sodium azulene sulfonate L-glutamine for managing chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in cancer patients: a prospective comparative study
title_sort efficacy of sodium azulene sulfonate l-glutamine for managing chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in cancer patients: a prospective comparative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6088392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-018-0114-2
work_keys_str_mv AT niheisatoru theefficacyofsodiumazulenesulfonatelglutamineformanagingchemotherapyinducedoralmucositisincancerpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT satojunya theefficacyofsodiumazulenesulfonatelglutamineformanagingchemotherapyinducedoralmucositisincancerpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT komatsuhideaki theefficacyofsodiumazulenesulfonatelglutamineformanagingchemotherapyinducedoralmucositisincancerpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT ishidakazushige theefficacyofsodiumazulenesulfonatelglutamineformanagingchemotherapyinducedoralmucositisincancerpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT kimuratoshimoto theefficacyofsodiumazulenesulfonatelglutamineformanagingchemotherapyinducedoralmucositisincancerpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT tomitatakashi theefficacyofsodiumazulenesulfonatelglutamineformanagingchemotherapyinducedoralmucositisincancerpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT kudokenzo theefficacyofsodiumazulenesulfonatelglutamineformanagingchemotherapyinducedoralmucositisincancerpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT niheisatoru efficacyofsodiumazulenesulfonatelglutamineformanagingchemotherapyinducedoralmucositisincancerpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT satojunya efficacyofsodiumazulenesulfonatelglutamineformanagingchemotherapyinducedoralmucositisincancerpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT komatsuhideaki efficacyofsodiumazulenesulfonatelglutamineformanagingchemotherapyinducedoralmucositisincancerpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT ishidakazushige efficacyofsodiumazulenesulfonatelglutamineformanagingchemotherapyinducedoralmucositisincancerpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT kimuratoshimoto efficacyofsodiumazulenesulfonatelglutamineformanagingchemotherapyinducedoralmucositisincancerpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT tomitatakashi efficacyofsodiumazulenesulfonatelglutamineformanagingchemotherapyinducedoralmucositisincancerpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT kudokenzo efficacyofsodiumazulenesulfonatelglutamineformanagingchemotherapyinducedoralmucositisincancerpatientsaprospectivecomparativestudy