Cargando…

Manipulating word awareness dissociates feed-forward from feedback models of language-perception interactions

Previous studies suggest that linguistic material can modulate visual perception, but it is unclear at which level of processing these interactions occur. Here we aim to dissociate between two competing models of language–perception interactions: a feed-forward and a feedback model. We capitalized o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Francken, Jolien C., Meijs, Erik L., Ridderinkhof, Odile M., Hagoort, Peter, de Lange, Floris P., van Gaal, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30135740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nc/niv003
_version_ 1783346959773335552
author Francken, Jolien C.
Meijs, Erik L.
Ridderinkhof, Odile M.
Hagoort, Peter
de Lange, Floris P.
van Gaal, Simon
author_facet Francken, Jolien C.
Meijs, Erik L.
Ridderinkhof, Odile M.
Hagoort, Peter
de Lange, Floris P.
van Gaal, Simon
author_sort Francken, Jolien C.
collection PubMed
description Previous studies suggest that linguistic material can modulate visual perception, but it is unclear at which level of processing these interactions occur. Here we aim to dissociate between two competing models of language–perception interactions: a feed-forward and a feedback model. We capitalized on the fact that the models make different predictions on the role of feedback. We presented unmasked (aware) or masked (unaware) words implying motion (e.g. “rise,” “fall”), directly preceding an upward or downward visual motion stimulus. Crucially, masking leaves intact feed-forward information processing from low- to high-level regions, whereas it abolishes subsequent feedback. Under this condition, participants remained faster and more accurate when the direction implied by the motion word was congruent with the direction of the visual motion stimulus. This suggests that language–perception interactions are driven by the feed-forward convergence of linguistic and perceptual information at higher-level conceptual and decision stages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6089086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60890862018-08-22 Manipulating word awareness dissociates feed-forward from feedback models of language-perception interactions Francken, Jolien C. Meijs, Erik L. Ridderinkhof, Odile M. Hagoort, Peter de Lange, Floris P. van Gaal, Simon Neurosci Conscious Research Article Previous studies suggest that linguistic material can modulate visual perception, but it is unclear at which level of processing these interactions occur. Here we aim to dissociate between two competing models of language–perception interactions: a feed-forward and a feedback model. We capitalized on the fact that the models make different predictions on the role of feedback. We presented unmasked (aware) or masked (unaware) words implying motion (e.g. “rise,” “fall”), directly preceding an upward or downward visual motion stimulus. Crucially, masking leaves intact feed-forward information processing from low- to high-level regions, whereas it abolishes subsequent feedback. Under this condition, participants remained faster and more accurate when the direction implied by the motion word was congruent with the direction of the visual motion stimulus. This suggests that language–perception interactions are driven by the feed-forward convergence of linguistic and perceptual information at higher-level conceptual and decision stages. Oxford University Press 2015-01 2015-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6089086/ /pubmed/30135740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nc/niv003 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Francken, Jolien C.
Meijs, Erik L.
Ridderinkhof, Odile M.
Hagoort, Peter
de Lange, Floris P.
van Gaal, Simon
Manipulating word awareness dissociates feed-forward from feedback models of language-perception interactions
title Manipulating word awareness dissociates feed-forward from feedback models of language-perception interactions
title_full Manipulating word awareness dissociates feed-forward from feedback models of language-perception interactions
title_fullStr Manipulating word awareness dissociates feed-forward from feedback models of language-perception interactions
title_full_unstemmed Manipulating word awareness dissociates feed-forward from feedback models of language-perception interactions
title_short Manipulating word awareness dissociates feed-forward from feedback models of language-perception interactions
title_sort manipulating word awareness dissociates feed-forward from feedback models of language-perception interactions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30135740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nc/niv003
work_keys_str_mv AT franckenjolienc manipulatingwordawarenessdissociatesfeedforwardfromfeedbackmodelsoflanguageperceptioninteractions
AT meijserikl manipulatingwordawarenessdissociatesfeedforwardfromfeedbackmodelsoflanguageperceptioninteractions
AT ridderinkhofodilem manipulatingwordawarenessdissociatesfeedforwardfromfeedbackmodelsoflanguageperceptioninteractions
AT hagoortpeter manipulatingwordawarenessdissociatesfeedforwardfromfeedbackmodelsoflanguageperceptioninteractions
AT delangeflorisp manipulatingwordawarenessdissociatesfeedforwardfromfeedbackmodelsoflanguageperceptioninteractions
AT vangaalsimon manipulatingwordawarenessdissociatesfeedforwardfromfeedbackmodelsoflanguageperceptioninteractions