Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE: PARP inhibition is an exciting new anticancer strategy. As the first PARP inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer, olaparib has proven to be effective in the treatment of several solid tumors. We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized controll...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Xiao Xia, Wu, Hong Li, Shi, Hong Yun, Su, Lei, Zhang, Xi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127642
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S169558
_version_ 1783346965521629184
author Guo, Xiao Xia
Wu, Hong Li
Shi, Hong Yun
Su, Lei
Zhang, Xi
author_facet Guo, Xiao Xia
Wu, Hong Li
Shi, Hong Yun
Su, Lei
Zhang, Xi
author_sort Guo, Xiao Xia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: PARP inhibition is an exciting new anticancer strategy. As the first PARP inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer, olaparib has proven to be effective in the treatment of several solid tumors. We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of olaparib in cancer patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and oncology-conference proceedings were searched for relevant studies. End points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3/4 adverse events. Pooled hazard ratio (HR)/risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI were calculated using random or fixed-effect models. RESULTS: Eight trials involving 1,957 patients were ultimately identified. The pooled analysis demonstrated that olaparib treatment significantly improved PFS (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47–0.82; P=0.001), OS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.93; P=0.001), and ORR (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.16–1.65; P<0.001) when compared with therapy not containing olaparib. This association was further confirmed by sensitivity analysis. Additionally, olaparib treatment offered a significant survival benefit for patients with BRCA mutation. Moreover, treatment with olaparib was associated with a significant increase in risk of severe anemia. CONCLUSION: Olaparib treatment has better treatment response compared with therapy not containing olaparib, whereas olaparib can increase the risk of severe anemia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6089112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60891122018-08-20 The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Guo, Xiao Xia Wu, Hong Li Shi, Hong Yun Su, Lei Zhang, Xi Cancer Manag Res Original Research PURPOSE: PARP inhibition is an exciting new anticancer strategy. As the first PARP inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer, olaparib has proven to be effective in the treatment of several solid tumors. We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of olaparib in cancer patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and oncology-conference proceedings were searched for relevant studies. End points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3/4 adverse events. Pooled hazard ratio (HR)/risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI were calculated using random or fixed-effect models. RESULTS: Eight trials involving 1,957 patients were ultimately identified. The pooled analysis demonstrated that olaparib treatment significantly improved PFS (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47–0.82; P=0.001), OS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.93; P=0.001), and ORR (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.16–1.65; P<0.001) when compared with therapy not containing olaparib. This association was further confirmed by sensitivity analysis. Additionally, olaparib treatment offered a significant survival benefit for patients with BRCA mutation. Moreover, treatment with olaparib was associated with a significant increase in risk of severe anemia. CONCLUSION: Olaparib treatment has better treatment response compared with therapy not containing olaparib, whereas olaparib can increase the risk of severe anemia. Dove Medical Press 2018-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6089112/ /pubmed/30127642 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S169558 Text en © 2018 Guo et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Guo, Xiao Xia
Wu, Hong Li
Shi, Hong Yun
Su, Lei
Zhang, Xi
The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127642
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S169558
work_keys_str_mv AT guoxiaoxia theefficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wuhongli theefficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shihongyun theefficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sulei theefficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangxi theefficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT guoxiaoxia efficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wuhongli efficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shihongyun efficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sulei efficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangxi efficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials