Cargando…
The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
PURPOSE: PARP inhibition is an exciting new anticancer strategy. As the first PARP inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer, olaparib has proven to be effective in the treatment of several solid tumors. We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized controll...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127642 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S169558 |
_version_ | 1783346965521629184 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Xiao Xia Wu, Hong Li Shi, Hong Yun Su, Lei Zhang, Xi |
author_facet | Guo, Xiao Xia Wu, Hong Li Shi, Hong Yun Su, Lei Zhang, Xi |
author_sort | Guo, Xiao Xia |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: PARP inhibition is an exciting new anticancer strategy. As the first PARP inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer, olaparib has proven to be effective in the treatment of several solid tumors. We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of olaparib in cancer patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and oncology-conference proceedings were searched for relevant studies. End points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3/4 adverse events. Pooled hazard ratio (HR)/risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI were calculated using random or fixed-effect models. RESULTS: Eight trials involving 1,957 patients were ultimately identified. The pooled analysis demonstrated that olaparib treatment significantly improved PFS (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47–0.82; P=0.001), OS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.93; P=0.001), and ORR (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.16–1.65; P<0.001) when compared with therapy not containing olaparib. This association was further confirmed by sensitivity analysis. Additionally, olaparib treatment offered a significant survival benefit for patients with BRCA mutation. Moreover, treatment with olaparib was associated with a significant increase in risk of severe anemia. CONCLUSION: Olaparib treatment has better treatment response compared with therapy not containing olaparib, whereas olaparib can increase the risk of severe anemia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6089112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60891122018-08-20 The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Guo, Xiao Xia Wu, Hong Li Shi, Hong Yun Su, Lei Zhang, Xi Cancer Manag Res Original Research PURPOSE: PARP inhibition is an exciting new anticancer strategy. As the first PARP inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer, olaparib has proven to be effective in the treatment of several solid tumors. We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of olaparib in cancer patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and oncology-conference proceedings were searched for relevant studies. End points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3/4 adverse events. Pooled hazard ratio (HR)/risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI were calculated using random or fixed-effect models. RESULTS: Eight trials involving 1,957 patients were ultimately identified. The pooled analysis demonstrated that olaparib treatment significantly improved PFS (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47–0.82; P=0.001), OS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.93; P=0.001), and ORR (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.16–1.65; P<0.001) when compared with therapy not containing olaparib. This association was further confirmed by sensitivity analysis. Additionally, olaparib treatment offered a significant survival benefit for patients with BRCA mutation. Moreover, treatment with olaparib was associated with a significant increase in risk of severe anemia. CONCLUSION: Olaparib treatment has better treatment response compared with therapy not containing olaparib, whereas olaparib can increase the risk of severe anemia. Dove Medical Press 2018-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6089112/ /pubmed/30127642 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S169558 Text en © 2018 Guo et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Guo, Xiao Xia Wu, Hong Li Shi, Hong Yun Su, Lei Zhang, Xi The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | The efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of olaparib in the treatment of cancers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30127642 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S169558 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guoxiaoxia theefficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wuhongli theefficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT shihongyun theefficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT sulei theefficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhangxi theefficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT guoxiaoxia efficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wuhongli efficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT shihongyun efficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT sulei efficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhangxi efficacyandsafetyofolaparibinthetreatmentofcancersametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |