Cargando…

Rational Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Pediatric and Congenital Heart Transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Donor shortage and organ allocation is the main problem in pediatric heart transplant. Mechanical circulatory support is known to increase waiting list survival, but it is not routinely used in pediatric programs in Latin America. METHODS: All patients listed for heart transplant and s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miana, Leonardo A., da Silva, Guilherme Viotto Rodrigues, Caneo, Luiz Fernando, Turquetto, Aida Luisa, Tanamati, Carla, Foronda, Gustavo, Massoti, Maria Raquel, Penha, Juliano G., Azeka, Estela, Galas, Filomena R. B. G., Jatene, Fabio B., Jatene, Marcelo B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30043916
http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0081
_version_ 1783346971143045120
author Miana, Leonardo A.
da Silva, Guilherme Viotto Rodrigues
Caneo, Luiz Fernando
Turquetto, Aida Luisa
Tanamati, Carla
Foronda, Gustavo
Massoti, Maria Raquel
Penha, Juliano G.
Azeka, Estela
Galas, Filomena R. B. G.
Jatene, Fabio B.
Jatene, Marcelo B.
author_facet Miana, Leonardo A.
da Silva, Guilherme Viotto Rodrigues
Caneo, Luiz Fernando
Turquetto, Aida Luisa
Tanamati, Carla
Foronda, Gustavo
Massoti, Maria Raquel
Penha, Juliano G.
Azeka, Estela
Galas, Filomena R. B. G.
Jatene, Fabio B.
Jatene, Marcelo B.
author_sort Miana, Leonardo A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Donor shortage and organ allocation is the main problem in pediatric heart transplant. Mechanical circulatory support is known to increase waiting list survival, but it is not routinely used in pediatric programs in Latin America. METHODS: All patients listed for heart transplant and supported by a mechanical circulatory support between January 2012 and March 2016 were included in this retrospective single-center study. The endpoints were mechanical circulatory support time, complications, heart transplant survival and discharge from the hospital. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients from our waiting list were assessed. Twelve (45%) patients were initially supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and a centrifugal pump was implanted in 17 (55%) patients. Five patients initially supported by ECMO were bridged to another device. One was bridged to a centrifugal pump and four were bridged to Berlin Heart Excor®. Among the 29 supported patients, 18 (62%) managed to have a heart transplant. Thirty-day survival period after heart transplant was 56% (10 patients). Median support duration was 12 days (interquartile range [IQR] 4 - 26 days) per run and the waiting time for heart transplant was 9.5 days (IQR 2.5-25 days). Acute kidney injury was identified as a mortality predictor (OR=22.6 [CI=1.04-494.6]; P=0.04). CONCLUSION: Mechanical circulatory support was able to bridge most INTERMACS 1 and 2 pediatric patients to transplant with an acceptable complication rate. Acute renal failure increased mortality after mechanical circulatory support in our experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6089136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60891362018-08-16 Rational Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Pediatric and Congenital Heart Transplantation Miana, Leonardo A. da Silva, Guilherme Viotto Rodrigues Caneo, Luiz Fernando Turquetto, Aida Luisa Tanamati, Carla Foronda, Gustavo Massoti, Maria Raquel Penha, Juliano G. Azeka, Estela Galas, Filomena R. B. G. Jatene, Fabio B. Jatene, Marcelo B. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: Donor shortage and organ allocation is the main problem in pediatric heart transplant. Mechanical circulatory support is known to increase waiting list survival, but it is not routinely used in pediatric programs in Latin America. METHODS: All patients listed for heart transplant and supported by a mechanical circulatory support between January 2012 and March 2016 were included in this retrospective single-center study. The endpoints were mechanical circulatory support time, complications, heart transplant survival and discharge from the hospital. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients from our waiting list were assessed. Twelve (45%) patients were initially supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and a centrifugal pump was implanted in 17 (55%) patients. Five patients initially supported by ECMO were bridged to another device. One was bridged to a centrifugal pump and four were bridged to Berlin Heart Excor®. Among the 29 supported patients, 18 (62%) managed to have a heart transplant. Thirty-day survival period after heart transplant was 56% (10 patients). Median support duration was 12 days (interquartile range [IQR] 4 - 26 days) per run and the waiting time for heart transplant was 9.5 days (IQR 2.5-25 days). Acute kidney injury was identified as a mortality predictor (OR=22.6 [CI=1.04-494.6]; P=0.04). CONCLUSION: Mechanical circulatory support was able to bridge most INTERMACS 1 and 2 pediatric patients to transplant with an acceptable complication rate. Acute renal failure increased mortality after mechanical circulatory support in our experience. Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6089136/ /pubmed/30043916 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0081 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Miana, Leonardo A.
da Silva, Guilherme Viotto Rodrigues
Caneo, Luiz Fernando
Turquetto, Aida Luisa
Tanamati, Carla
Foronda, Gustavo
Massoti, Maria Raquel
Penha, Juliano G.
Azeka, Estela
Galas, Filomena R. B. G.
Jatene, Fabio B.
Jatene, Marcelo B.
Rational Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Pediatric and Congenital Heart Transplantation
title Rational Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Pediatric and Congenital Heart Transplantation
title_full Rational Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Pediatric and Congenital Heart Transplantation
title_fullStr Rational Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Pediatric and Congenital Heart Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Rational Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Pediatric and Congenital Heart Transplantation
title_short Rational Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Pediatric and Congenital Heart Transplantation
title_sort rational use of mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to pediatric and congenital heart transplantation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30043916
http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0081
work_keys_str_mv AT mianaleonardoa rationaluseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportasabridgetopediatricandcongenitalhearttransplantation
AT dasilvaguilhermeviottorodrigues rationaluseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportasabridgetopediatricandcongenitalhearttransplantation
AT caneoluizfernando rationaluseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportasabridgetopediatricandcongenitalhearttransplantation
AT turquettoaidaluisa rationaluseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportasabridgetopediatricandcongenitalhearttransplantation
AT tanamaticarla rationaluseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportasabridgetopediatricandcongenitalhearttransplantation
AT forondagustavo rationaluseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportasabridgetopediatricandcongenitalhearttransplantation
AT massotimariaraquel rationaluseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportasabridgetopediatricandcongenitalhearttransplantation
AT penhajulianog rationaluseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportasabridgetopediatricandcongenitalhearttransplantation
AT azekaestela rationaluseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportasabridgetopediatricandcongenitalhearttransplantation
AT galasfilomenarbg rationaluseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportasabridgetopediatricandcongenitalhearttransplantation
AT jatenefabiob rationaluseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportasabridgetopediatricandcongenitalhearttransplantation
AT jatenemarcelob rationaluseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportasabridgetopediatricandcongenitalhearttransplantation