Cargando…

Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population‐based retrospective study

AIM: This study aimed to investigate circumferential resection margin (CRM) as a prognostic factor for long‐term oncologic survival after rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with malignant rectal cancer between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Qi, Luo, Dakui, Cai, Sanjun, Li, Qingguo, Li, Xinxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29992773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1662
_version_ 1783346978282799104
author Liu, Qi
Luo, Dakui
Cai, Sanjun
Li, Qingguo
Li, Xinxiang
author_facet Liu, Qi
Luo, Dakui
Cai, Sanjun
Li, Qingguo
Li, Xinxiang
author_sort Liu, Qi
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study aimed to investigate circumferential resection margin (CRM) as a prognostic factor for long‐term oncologic survival after rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with malignant rectal cancer between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were identified for this study. The patients were divided into five CRM groups to compare the baseline characteristics and assess cancer‐specific survival (CSS): 0‐1 mm, 1.1‐2.0 mm, 2.1‐5.0 mm, 5.1‐10.0 mm, and >10 mm. The main endpoint was CSS. RESULTS: Circumferential resection margin ≤1 mm was independently associated with 99% increased risk of cancer‐specific mortality in rectal cancer [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.990, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.613‐2.454, P < 0.001, using CRM (1.1‐2.0 mm) as a reference]. CRM (5.1‐10.0 mm) was independently associated with 29.2% decreased risk of cancer‐specific mortality [HR = 0.708, 95% CI = 0.525‐0.954, P = 0.152, using group (2.1‐5.0 mm) as reference]. CRM ≤2 mm or ≤0.4 mm was not obviously associated with CSS. CONCLUSIONS: circumferential resection margin is an independent prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Surgeons should try to maximize the CRM. Rectal cancer patients with CRM ≤1 mm should receive more postoperative attention depending on individual situation. Also, CRM should be accurately measured in millimeters in a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or pathological report, rather than simply described as “involved” or “clear.”
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6089167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60891672018-08-17 Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population‐based retrospective study Liu, Qi Luo, Dakui Cai, Sanjun Li, Qingguo Li, Xinxiang Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research AIM: This study aimed to investigate circumferential resection margin (CRM) as a prognostic factor for long‐term oncologic survival after rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with malignant rectal cancer between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were identified for this study. The patients were divided into five CRM groups to compare the baseline characteristics and assess cancer‐specific survival (CSS): 0‐1 mm, 1.1‐2.0 mm, 2.1‐5.0 mm, 5.1‐10.0 mm, and >10 mm. The main endpoint was CSS. RESULTS: Circumferential resection margin ≤1 mm was independently associated with 99% increased risk of cancer‐specific mortality in rectal cancer [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.990, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.613‐2.454, P < 0.001, using CRM (1.1‐2.0 mm) as a reference]. CRM (5.1‐10.0 mm) was independently associated with 29.2% decreased risk of cancer‐specific mortality [HR = 0.708, 95% CI = 0.525‐0.954, P = 0.152, using group (2.1‐5.0 mm) as reference]. CRM ≤2 mm or ≤0.4 mm was not obviously associated with CSS. CONCLUSIONS: circumferential resection margin is an independent prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Surgeons should try to maximize the CRM. Rectal cancer patients with CRM ≤1 mm should receive more postoperative attention depending on individual situation. Also, CRM should be accurately measured in millimeters in a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or pathological report, rather than simply described as “involved” or “clear.” John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6089167/ /pubmed/29992773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1662 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Liu, Qi
Luo, Dakui
Cai, Sanjun
Li, Qingguo
Li, Xinxiang
Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population‐based retrospective study
title Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population‐based retrospective study
title_full Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population‐based retrospective study
title_fullStr Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population‐based retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population‐based retrospective study
title_short Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population‐based retrospective study
title_sort circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: a large population‐based retrospective study
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29992773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1662
work_keys_str_mv AT liuqi circumferentialresectionmarginasaprognosticfactorafterrectalcancersurgeryalargepopulationbasedretrospectivestudy
AT luodakui circumferentialresectionmarginasaprognosticfactorafterrectalcancersurgeryalargepopulationbasedretrospectivestudy
AT caisanjun circumferentialresectionmarginasaprognosticfactorafterrectalcancersurgeryalargepopulationbasedretrospectivestudy
AT liqingguo circumferentialresectionmarginasaprognosticfactorafterrectalcancersurgeryalargepopulationbasedretrospectivestudy
AT lixinxiang circumferentialresectionmarginasaprognosticfactorafterrectalcancersurgeryalargepopulationbasedretrospectivestudy