Cargando…

Effectiveness of traditional lectures and case methods in Swedish general practitioners’ continuing medical education about COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of continuing medical education (CME) about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for general practitioners (GPs) by comparing two commonly used CME methods with each other and no CME (reference group). DESIGN: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandelowsky, Hanna, Krakau, Ingvar, Modin, Sonja, Ställberg, Björn, Johansson, Sven-Erik, Nager, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30099398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021982
_version_ 1783346991205449728
author Sandelowsky, Hanna
Krakau, Ingvar
Modin, Sonja
Ställberg, Björn
Johansson, Sven-Erik
Nager, Anna
author_facet Sandelowsky, Hanna
Krakau, Ingvar
Modin, Sonja
Ställberg, Björn
Johansson, Sven-Erik
Nager, Anna
author_sort Sandelowsky, Hanna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of continuing medical education (CME) about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for general practitioners (GPs) by comparing two commonly used CME methods with each other and no CME (reference group). DESIGN: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial with primary healthcare centres (PHCCs) as units of randomisation. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: 24 PHCCs in Stockholm County, Sweden, were randomised into two CME intervention arms: case method learning (CM) (n=12) and traditional lectures (TL) (n=12). A reference group without CME (n=11) was recruited separately. GPs (n=255) participated in the study arm to which their PHCC was allocated: CM, n=87; TL, n=93; and reference, n=75. Two 2-hour CME seminars were given in a period of 3 months. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in scores between baseline and 12 months on a 13-item questionnaire about evidence-based COPD management (0–2 points/question, maximum total score 26 points). RESULTS: 133 (52%) GPs completed the questionnaire both at baseline and 12 months. Both CM and TL resulted in small yet significantly higher total scores at 12 months than at baseline (CM, 10.34 vs 11.44; TL, 10.21 vs 10.91; p<0.05); there were few significant differences between these CME methods. At both baseline and 12 months, all three groups’ scores were generally high on questions about smoking cessation support and low on those that measured spirometry interpretation skills, interprofessional care and management of multimorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Neither short CM nor short TL CME sessions substantially improve GPs’ skills in managing COPD. It is justified to challenge the use of these common CME methods as a strategy for improving GPs’ level of knowledge about management of COPD and other complex chronic diseases characterised by multimorbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02213809; Results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6089265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60892652018-08-15 Effectiveness of traditional lectures and case methods in Swedish general practitioners’ continuing medical education about COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial Sandelowsky, Hanna Krakau, Ingvar Modin, Sonja Ställberg, Björn Johansson, Sven-Erik Nager, Anna BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of continuing medical education (CME) about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for general practitioners (GPs) by comparing two commonly used CME methods with each other and no CME (reference group). DESIGN: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial with primary healthcare centres (PHCCs) as units of randomisation. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: 24 PHCCs in Stockholm County, Sweden, were randomised into two CME intervention arms: case method learning (CM) (n=12) and traditional lectures (TL) (n=12). A reference group without CME (n=11) was recruited separately. GPs (n=255) participated in the study arm to which their PHCC was allocated: CM, n=87; TL, n=93; and reference, n=75. Two 2-hour CME seminars were given in a period of 3 months. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in scores between baseline and 12 months on a 13-item questionnaire about evidence-based COPD management (0–2 points/question, maximum total score 26 points). RESULTS: 133 (52%) GPs completed the questionnaire both at baseline and 12 months. Both CM and TL resulted in small yet significantly higher total scores at 12 months than at baseline (CM, 10.34 vs 11.44; TL, 10.21 vs 10.91; p<0.05); there were few significant differences between these CME methods. At both baseline and 12 months, all three groups’ scores were generally high on questions about smoking cessation support and low on those that measured spirometry interpretation skills, interprofessional care and management of multimorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Neither short CM nor short TL CME sessions substantially improve GPs’ skills in managing COPD. It is justified to challenge the use of these common CME methods as a strategy for improving GPs’ level of knowledge about management of COPD and other complex chronic diseases characterised by multimorbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02213809; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6089265/ /pubmed/30099398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021982 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Sandelowsky, Hanna
Krakau, Ingvar
Modin, Sonja
Ställberg, Björn
Johansson, Sven-Erik
Nager, Anna
Effectiveness of traditional lectures and case methods in Swedish general practitioners’ continuing medical education about COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title Effectiveness of traditional lectures and case methods in Swedish general practitioners’ continuing medical education about COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of traditional lectures and case methods in Swedish general practitioners’ continuing medical education about COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of traditional lectures and case methods in Swedish general practitioners’ continuing medical education about COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of traditional lectures and case methods in Swedish general practitioners’ continuing medical education about COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of traditional lectures and case methods in Swedish general practitioners’ continuing medical education about COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of traditional lectures and case methods in swedish general practitioners’ continuing medical education about copd: a cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30099398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021982
work_keys_str_mv AT sandelowskyhanna effectivenessoftraditionallecturesandcasemethodsinswedishgeneralpractitionerscontinuingmedicaleducationaboutcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT krakauingvar effectivenessoftraditionallecturesandcasemethodsinswedishgeneralpractitionerscontinuingmedicaleducationaboutcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT modinsonja effectivenessoftraditionallecturesandcasemethodsinswedishgeneralpractitionerscontinuingmedicaleducationaboutcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stallbergbjorn effectivenessoftraditionallecturesandcasemethodsinswedishgeneralpractitionerscontinuingmedicaleducationaboutcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT johanssonsvenerik effectivenessoftraditionallecturesandcasemethodsinswedishgeneralpractitionerscontinuingmedicaleducationaboutcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nageranna effectivenessoftraditionallecturesandcasemethodsinswedishgeneralpractitionerscontinuingmedicaleducationaboutcopdaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial