Cargando…

Evaluation of ADA HbA1c criteria in the diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in a population of Chinese adolescents and young adults at high risk for diabetes: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) for the diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in a population of Chinese youths at risk of metabolic syndrome. SETTING: Beijing, China. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 581 subjects aged 14–28 years underwent evaluation including an oral glucose toleran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ge, Han, Lanwen, Wang, Yonghui, Zhao, Yanglu, Li, Yu, Fu, Junling, Li, Ming, Gao, Shan, Willi, Steven M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30093511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020665
_version_ 1783346993060380672
author Li, Ge
Han, Lanwen
Wang, Yonghui
Zhao, Yanglu
Li, Yu
Fu, Junling
Li, Ming
Gao, Shan
Willi, Steven M
author_facet Li, Ge
Han, Lanwen
Wang, Yonghui
Zhao, Yanglu
Li, Yu
Fu, Junling
Li, Ming
Gao, Shan
Willi, Steven M
author_sort Li, Ge
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) for the diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in a population of Chinese youths at risk of metabolic syndrome. SETTING: Beijing, China. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 581 subjects aged 14–28 years underwent evaluation including an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Insulin sensitivity, β-cell function and a number of cardiovascular disease risk factors were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the screening efficacy of HbA1c. RESULTS: Using OGTT data as a standard, the majority (70.0%, 7/10) of subjects with diabetes would have been diagnosed with HbA1c ≥6.5%. In contrast, only 28.1% (16/57) of subjects with pre-diabetes possessed elevated HbA1cs, while the majority (68.4%) had normal HbA1cs. On the contrary, a total of 8.1% (39/479) of youths in the normal HbA1c category (<5.7%) and 21.3% in the pre-diabetes category had pre-diabetes. In the ROC analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for HbA1c identifying pre-diabetes was 0.680(95% CI 0.640 to 0.719); the optimal threshold was 5.5%, with a sensitivity of 61.4% and specificity of 68.5%. For type 2 diabetes mellitus, the AUC for HbA1c was 0.970 (0.952 to 0.982), and the optimal threshold was 6.1%, with a sensitivity of 90.0% and a specificity of 98.7%. Applying these new cut-offs, pre-diabetic participants (HbA1c 5.5%–6.1%) had lower disposition index and higher risk of dyslipidaemia (OR=1.61,95% CI 1.10 to 2.37) and metabolic syndrome (OR=2.09, 1.27 to 3.45) than those with normal HbA1c (<5.5%). CONCLUSION: The American Diabetes Association’s established HbA1c criteria for pre-diabetes and diabetes (5.7% and 6.5%) may not be appropriately applied to adolescents and young adults in China. Our findings suggest that those with HbA1c of 5.5%–6.1% already exhibit impaired β-cell function and increased cardiometabolic risk factors which may warrant intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03421444.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6089273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60892732018-08-15 Evaluation of ADA HbA1c criteria in the diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in a population of Chinese adolescents and young adults at high risk for diabetes: a cross-sectional study Li, Ge Han, Lanwen Wang, Yonghui Zhao, Yanglu Li, Yu Fu, Junling Li, Ming Gao, Shan Willi, Steven M BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) for the diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in a population of Chinese youths at risk of metabolic syndrome. SETTING: Beijing, China. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 581 subjects aged 14–28 years underwent evaluation including an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Insulin sensitivity, β-cell function and a number of cardiovascular disease risk factors were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the screening efficacy of HbA1c. RESULTS: Using OGTT data as a standard, the majority (70.0%, 7/10) of subjects with diabetes would have been diagnosed with HbA1c ≥6.5%. In contrast, only 28.1% (16/57) of subjects with pre-diabetes possessed elevated HbA1cs, while the majority (68.4%) had normal HbA1cs. On the contrary, a total of 8.1% (39/479) of youths in the normal HbA1c category (<5.7%) and 21.3% in the pre-diabetes category had pre-diabetes. In the ROC analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for HbA1c identifying pre-diabetes was 0.680(95% CI 0.640 to 0.719); the optimal threshold was 5.5%, with a sensitivity of 61.4% and specificity of 68.5%. For type 2 diabetes mellitus, the AUC for HbA1c was 0.970 (0.952 to 0.982), and the optimal threshold was 6.1%, with a sensitivity of 90.0% and a specificity of 98.7%. Applying these new cut-offs, pre-diabetic participants (HbA1c 5.5%–6.1%) had lower disposition index and higher risk of dyslipidaemia (OR=1.61,95% CI 1.10 to 2.37) and metabolic syndrome (OR=2.09, 1.27 to 3.45) than those with normal HbA1c (<5.5%). CONCLUSION: The American Diabetes Association’s established HbA1c criteria for pre-diabetes and diabetes (5.7% and 6.5%) may not be appropriately applied to adolescents and young adults in China. Our findings suggest that those with HbA1c of 5.5%–6.1% already exhibit impaired β-cell function and increased cardiometabolic risk factors which may warrant intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03421444. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6089273/ /pubmed/30093511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020665 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Diabetes and Endocrinology
Li, Ge
Han, Lanwen
Wang, Yonghui
Zhao, Yanglu
Li, Yu
Fu, Junling
Li, Ming
Gao, Shan
Willi, Steven M
Evaluation of ADA HbA1c criteria in the diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in a population of Chinese adolescents and young adults at high risk for diabetes: a cross-sectional study
title Evaluation of ADA HbA1c criteria in the diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in a population of Chinese adolescents and young adults at high risk for diabetes: a cross-sectional study
title_full Evaluation of ADA HbA1c criteria in the diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in a population of Chinese adolescents and young adults at high risk for diabetes: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Evaluation of ADA HbA1c criteria in the diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in a population of Chinese adolescents and young adults at high risk for diabetes: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of ADA HbA1c criteria in the diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in a population of Chinese adolescents and young adults at high risk for diabetes: a cross-sectional study
title_short Evaluation of ADA HbA1c criteria in the diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in a population of Chinese adolescents and young adults at high risk for diabetes: a cross-sectional study
title_sort evaluation of ada hba1c criteria in the diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in a population of chinese adolescents and young adults at high risk for diabetes: a cross-sectional study
topic Diabetes and Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30093511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020665
work_keys_str_mv AT lige evaluationofadahba1ccriteriainthediagnosisofprediabetesanddiabetesinapopulationofchineseadolescentsandyoungadultsathighriskfordiabetesacrosssectionalstudy
AT hanlanwen evaluationofadahba1ccriteriainthediagnosisofprediabetesanddiabetesinapopulationofchineseadolescentsandyoungadultsathighriskfordiabetesacrosssectionalstudy
AT wangyonghui evaluationofadahba1ccriteriainthediagnosisofprediabetesanddiabetesinapopulationofchineseadolescentsandyoungadultsathighriskfordiabetesacrosssectionalstudy
AT zhaoyanglu evaluationofadahba1ccriteriainthediagnosisofprediabetesanddiabetesinapopulationofchineseadolescentsandyoungadultsathighriskfordiabetesacrosssectionalstudy
AT liyu evaluationofadahba1ccriteriainthediagnosisofprediabetesanddiabetesinapopulationofchineseadolescentsandyoungadultsathighriskfordiabetesacrosssectionalstudy
AT fujunling evaluationofadahba1ccriteriainthediagnosisofprediabetesanddiabetesinapopulationofchineseadolescentsandyoungadultsathighriskfordiabetesacrosssectionalstudy
AT liming evaluationofadahba1ccriteriainthediagnosisofprediabetesanddiabetesinapopulationofchineseadolescentsandyoungadultsathighriskfordiabetesacrosssectionalstudy
AT gaoshan evaluationofadahba1ccriteriainthediagnosisofprediabetesanddiabetesinapopulationofchineseadolescentsandyoungadultsathighriskfordiabetesacrosssectionalstudy
AT willistevenm evaluationofadahba1ccriteriainthediagnosisofprediabetesanddiabetesinapopulationofchineseadolescentsandyoungadultsathighriskfordiabetesacrosssectionalstudy