Cargando…

Binational cohort study comparing the management and outcomes of pregnant women with a BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2) and those with a BMI ≥60 kg/m(2)

OBJECTIVES: To compare the management, maternal and perinatal outcomes of women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥60 kg/m(2) with women with a BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2). DESIGN: International collaborative cohort study. SETTING: Binational study in the UK and Australia. PARTICIPANTS: UK: all pregnant wome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCall, Stephen J, Li, Zhuoyang, Kurinczuk, Jennifer J, Sullivan, Elizabeth, Knight, Marian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30099391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021055
_version_ 1783347002491273216
author McCall, Stephen J
Li, Zhuoyang
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J
Sullivan, Elizabeth
Knight, Marian
author_facet McCall, Stephen J
Li, Zhuoyang
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J
Sullivan, Elizabeth
Knight, Marian
author_sort McCall, Stephen J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the management, maternal and perinatal outcomes of women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥60 kg/m(2) with women with a BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2). DESIGN: International collaborative cohort study. SETTING: Binational study in the UK and Australia. PARTICIPANTS: UK: all pregnant women, and Australia: women who gave birth (birth weight ≥400 g or gestation ≥20 weeks) METHODS: Data from the Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System and UK Obstetric Surveillance System. Management, maternal and infant outcomes were compared between women with a BMI ≥60 kg/m(2) and women with a BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2), using unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: The sociodemographic characteristics and previous medical histories were similar between the 111 women with a BMI ≥60 kg/m(2) and the 821 women with a BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2). Women with a BMI ≥60 kg/m(2) had higher odds of thromboprophylaxis usage in both the antenatal (24% vs. 12%; OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.64) and postpartum periods (78% vs. 66%; OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.70). Women with BMI ≥60 kg/m(2) had nearly double the odds of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (adjusted OR 1.83 (95% CI 1.01 to 3.30)). No other maternal or perinatal outcomes were statistically significantly different. Severe adverse outcomes such as perinatal death were uncommon in both groups thus limiting the power of these comparisons. The rate of perinatal deaths was 18 per 1000 births for those with BMI ≥60 kg/m(2); 12 per 1000 births for those with BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2); those with BMI ≥60 kg/m(2) had a non-significant increased odds of perinatal death (unadjusted OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.31 to 6.74). CONCLUSIONS: Women are managed differently on the basis of BMI even at this extreme as shown by thromboprophylaxis. The pre-eclampsia result suggests that future research should examine whether weight reduction of any amount prior to pregnancy could reduce poor outcomes even if women remain extremely obese.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6089316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60893162018-08-15 Binational cohort study comparing the management and outcomes of pregnant women with a BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2) and those with a BMI ≥60 kg/m(2) McCall, Stephen J Li, Zhuoyang Kurinczuk, Jennifer J Sullivan, Elizabeth Knight, Marian BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: To compare the management, maternal and perinatal outcomes of women with a body mass index (BMI) ≥60 kg/m(2) with women with a BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2). DESIGN: International collaborative cohort study. SETTING: Binational study in the UK and Australia. PARTICIPANTS: UK: all pregnant women, and Australia: women who gave birth (birth weight ≥400 g or gestation ≥20 weeks) METHODS: Data from the Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System and UK Obstetric Surveillance System. Management, maternal and infant outcomes were compared between women with a BMI ≥60 kg/m(2) and women with a BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2), using unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: The sociodemographic characteristics and previous medical histories were similar between the 111 women with a BMI ≥60 kg/m(2) and the 821 women with a BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2). Women with a BMI ≥60 kg/m(2) had higher odds of thromboprophylaxis usage in both the antenatal (24% vs. 12%; OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.64) and postpartum periods (78% vs. 66%; OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.70). Women with BMI ≥60 kg/m(2) had nearly double the odds of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (adjusted OR 1.83 (95% CI 1.01 to 3.30)). No other maternal or perinatal outcomes were statistically significantly different. Severe adverse outcomes such as perinatal death were uncommon in both groups thus limiting the power of these comparisons. The rate of perinatal deaths was 18 per 1000 births for those with BMI ≥60 kg/m(2); 12 per 1000 births for those with BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2); those with BMI ≥60 kg/m(2) had a non-significant increased odds of perinatal death (unadjusted OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.31 to 6.74). CONCLUSIONS: Women are managed differently on the basis of BMI even at this extreme as shown by thromboprophylaxis. The pre-eclampsia result suggests that future research should examine whether weight reduction of any amount prior to pregnancy could reduce poor outcomes even if women remain extremely obese. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6089316/ /pubmed/30099391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021055 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
McCall, Stephen J
Li, Zhuoyang
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J
Sullivan, Elizabeth
Knight, Marian
Binational cohort study comparing the management and outcomes of pregnant women with a BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2) and those with a BMI ≥60 kg/m(2)
title Binational cohort study comparing the management and outcomes of pregnant women with a BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2) and those with a BMI ≥60 kg/m(2)
title_full Binational cohort study comparing the management and outcomes of pregnant women with a BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2) and those with a BMI ≥60 kg/m(2)
title_fullStr Binational cohort study comparing the management and outcomes of pregnant women with a BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2) and those with a BMI ≥60 kg/m(2)
title_full_unstemmed Binational cohort study comparing the management and outcomes of pregnant women with a BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2) and those with a BMI ≥60 kg/m(2)
title_short Binational cohort study comparing the management and outcomes of pregnant women with a BMI >50–59.9 kg/m(2) and those with a BMI ≥60 kg/m(2)
title_sort binational cohort study comparing the management and outcomes of pregnant women with a bmi >50–59.9 kg/m(2) and those with a bmi ≥60 kg/m(2)
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30099391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021055
work_keys_str_mv AT mccallstephenj binationalcohortstudycomparingthemanagementandoutcomesofpregnantwomenwithabmi50599kgm2andthosewithabmi60kgm2
AT lizhuoyang binationalcohortstudycomparingthemanagementandoutcomesofpregnantwomenwithabmi50599kgm2andthosewithabmi60kgm2
AT kurinczukjenniferj binationalcohortstudycomparingthemanagementandoutcomesofpregnantwomenwithabmi50599kgm2andthosewithabmi60kgm2
AT sullivanelizabeth binationalcohortstudycomparingthemanagementandoutcomesofpregnantwomenwithabmi50599kgm2andthosewithabmi60kgm2
AT knightmarian binationalcohortstudycomparingthemanagementandoutcomesofpregnantwomenwithabmi50599kgm2andthosewithabmi60kgm2