Cargando…

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study

INTRODUCTION: Bladder cancer (BC) is a common malignancy and one of the most expensive to manage. Radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymphadenectomy is a gold standard treatment for high-risk BC. Reductions in morbidity and mortality from RC may be achieved through robot-assisted RC (RARC). Prospec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Catto, James W F, Khetrapal, Pramit, Ambler, Gareth, Sarpong, Rachael, Khan, Muhammad Shamim, Tan, Melanie, Feber, Andrew, Dixon, Simon, Goodwin, Louise, Williams, Norman R, McGrath, John, Rowe, Edward, Koupparis, Anthony, Brew-Graves, Chris, Kelly, John D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30093510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020500
_version_ 1783347002962083840
author Catto, James W F
Khetrapal, Pramit
Ambler, Gareth
Sarpong, Rachael
Khan, Muhammad Shamim
Tan, Melanie
Feber, Andrew
Dixon, Simon
Goodwin, Louise
Williams, Norman R
McGrath, John
Rowe, Edward
Koupparis, Anthony
Brew-Graves, Chris
Kelly, John D
author_facet Catto, James W F
Khetrapal, Pramit
Ambler, Gareth
Sarpong, Rachael
Khan, Muhammad Shamim
Tan, Melanie
Feber, Andrew
Dixon, Simon
Goodwin, Louise
Williams, Norman R
McGrath, John
Rowe, Edward
Koupparis, Anthony
Brew-Graves, Chris
Kelly, John D
author_sort Catto, James W F
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Bladder cancer (BC) is a common malignancy and one of the most expensive to manage. Radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymphadenectomy is a gold standard treatment for high-risk BC. Reductions in morbidity and mortality from RC may be achieved through robot-assisted RC (RARC). Prospective comparisons between open RC (ORC) and RARC have been limited by sample size, use of extracorporeal reconstruction and use of outcomes important for ORC. Conversely, while RARC is gaining in popularity, there is little evidence to suggest it is superior to ORC. We are undertaking a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare RARC with intracorporeal reconstruction (iRARC) and ORC using multimodal outcomes to explore qualitative and quantitative recovery after surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: iROC is a multicentre prospective RCT in English National Health Service (NHS) cancer centres. We will randomise 320 patients undergoing RC to either iRARC or ORC. Treatment allocation will occur after trial entry and consent. The primary outcome is days alive and out of hospital within the first 90 days from surgery. Secondary outcomes will measure functional recovery (activity trackers, chair-to-stand tests and health related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires), morbidity (complications and readmissions), cost-effectiveness (using EuroQol-5 Domain-5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) and unit costs) and surgeon fatigue. Patients will be analysed according to intention to treat. The primary outcome will be transformed and analysed using regression. All statistical assumptions will be investigated. Secondary outcomes will be analysed using appropriate regression methods. An internal feasibility study of the first 30 patients will evaluate recruitment rates, acceptance of randomised treatment choice, compliance outcome collection and to revise our sample size. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has ethical approval (REC reference 16/NE/0418). Findings will be made available to patients, clinicians, funders and the NHS through peer-reviewed publications, social media and patient support groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ISRCTN13680280 and NCT03049410.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6089318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60893182018-08-15 Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study Catto, James W F Khetrapal, Pramit Ambler, Gareth Sarpong, Rachael Khan, Muhammad Shamim Tan, Melanie Feber, Andrew Dixon, Simon Goodwin, Louise Williams, Norman R McGrath, John Rowe, Edward Koupparis, Anthony Brew-Graves, Chris Kelly, John D BMJ Open Urology INTRODUCTION: Bladder cancer (BC) is a common malignancy and one of the most expensive to manage. Radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymphadenectomy is a gold standard treatment for high-risk BC. Reductions in morbidity and mortality from RC may be achieved through robot-assisted RC (RARC). Prospective comparisons between open RC (ORC) and RARC have been limited by sample size, use of extracorporeal reconstruction and use of outcomes important for ORC. Conversely, while RARC is gaining in popularity, there is little evidence to suggest it is superior to ORC. We are undertaking a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare RARC with intracorporeal reconstruction (iRARC) and ORC using multimodal outcomes to explore qualitative and quantitative recovery after surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: iROC is a multicentre prospective RCT in English National Health Service (NHS) cancer centres. We will randomise 320 patients undergoing RC to either iRARC or ORC. Treatment allocation will occur after trial entry and consent. The primary outcome is days alive and out of hospital within the first 90 days from surgery. Secondary outcomes will measure functional recovery (activity trackers, chair-to-stand tests and health related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires), morbidity (complications and readmissions), cost-effectiveness (using EuroQol-5 Domain-5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) and unit costs) and surgeon fatigue. Patients will be analysed according to intention to treat. The primary outcome will be transformed and analysed using regression. All statistical assumptions will be investigated. Secondary outcomes will be analysed using appropriate regression methods. An internal feasibility study of the first 30 patients will evaluate recruitment rates, acceptance of randomised treatment choice, compliance outcome collection and to revise our sample size. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has ethical approval (REC reference 16/NE/0418). Findings will be made available to patients, clinicians, funders and the NHS through peer-reviewed publications, social media and patient support groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ISRCTN13680280 and NCT03049410. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6089318/ /pubmed/30093510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020500 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Urology
Catto, James W F
Khetrapal, Pramit
Ambler, Gareth
Sarpong, Rachael
Khan, Muhammad Shamim
Tan, Melanie
Feber, Andrew
Dixon, Simon
Goodwin, Louise
Williams, Norman R
McGrath, John
Rowe, Edward
Koupparis, Anthony
Brew-Graves, Chris
Kelly, John D
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study
title Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study
title_full Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study
title_fullStr Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study
title_short Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study
title_sort robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iroc): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30093510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020500
work_keys_str_mv AT cattojameswf robotassistedradicalcystectomywithintracorporealurinarydiversionversusopenradicalcystectomyirocprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalfeasibilitystudy
AT khetrapalpramit robotassistedradicalcystectomywithintracorporealurinarydiversionversusopenradicalcystectomyirocprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalfeasibilitystudy
AT amblergareth robotassistedradicalcystectomywithintracorporealurinarydiversionversusopenradicalcystectomyirocprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalfeasibilitystudy
AT sarpongrachael robotassistedradicalcystectomywithintracorporealurinarydiversionversusopenradicalcystectomyirocprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalfeasibilitystudy
AT khanmuhammadshamim robotassistedradicalcystectomywithintracorporealurinarydiversionversusopenradicalcystectomyirocprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalfeasibilitystudy
AT tanmelanie robotassistedradicalcystectomywithintracorporealurinarydiversionversusopenradicalcystectomyirocprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalfeasibilitystudy
AT feberandrew robotassistedradicalcystectomywithintracorporealurinarydiversionversusopenradicalcystectomyirocprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalfeasibilitystudy
AT dixonsimon robotassistedradicalcystectomywithintracorporealurinarydiversionversusopenradicalcystectomyirocprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalfeasibilitystudy
AT goodwinlouise robotassistedradicalcystectomywithintracorporealurinarydiversionversusopenradicalcystectomyirocprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalfeasibilitystudy
AT williamsnormanr robotassistedradicalcystectomywithintracorporealurinarydiversionversusopenradicalcystectomyirocprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalfeasibilitystudy
AT mcgrathjohn robotassistedradicalcystectomywithintracorporealurinarydiversionversusopenradicalcystectomyirocprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalfeasibilitystudy
AT roweedward robotassistedradicalcystectomywithintracorporealurinarydiversionversusopenradicalcystectomyirocprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalfeasibilitystudy
AT koupparisanthony robotassistedradicalcystectomywithintracorporealurinarydiversionversusopenradicalcystectomyirocprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalfeasibilitystudy
AT brewgraveschris robotassistedradicalcystectomywithintracorporealurinarydiversionversusopenradicalcystectomyirocprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalfeasibilitystudy
AT kellyjohnd robotassistedradicalcystectomywithintracorporealurinarydiversionversusopenradicalcystectomyirocprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialwithinternalfeasibilitystudy