Cargando…

The prognostic analysis of different metastatic patterns in advanced liver cancer patients: A population based analysis

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of different distant metastases pattern in liver cancer is unexplored still now. The aim of this study is to analyze the metastasis patterns and prognosis differences for patients with stage IV liver cancers. METHODS: A SEER analysis was performed. Overall survival...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chen, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30102707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200909
_version_ 1783347015614201856
author Chen, Jie
author_facet Chen, Jie
author_sort Chen, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of different distant metastases pattern in liver cancer is unexplored still now. The aim of this study is to analyze the metastasis patterns and prognosis differences for patients with stage IV liver cancers. METHODS: A SEER analysis was performed. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to further analyze survival outcome and other prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 37526 eligible cases were retrieved in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Among these patients, stage of IV liver cancer accounted for 14.80% (5555/37526) at initial diagnosis. Patients who suffered bone, brain or lung metastasis occupied 55.61% (3089/5555). Comparing with other two single metastases, the patients with brain metastasis exhibited worst overall survival whose mean of survival was 4.758 months. Multivariate analysis with Cox hazard regression model showed that metastatic site was an independent prognostic factor of overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with single metastasis (P<0.05). The results of univariate analysis showed that metastatic pattern was significantly correlated with overall survival (P = 0.038) and cancer-specific survival (P = 0.035) of patients with two sites. CONCLUSIONS: Lung was the most common site of single metastasis for liver cancers. Patients with bone metastasis had best survival outcome comparing with other two distant metastases. Patients with two metastatic sites, where one of them is the lung tends to have a slight trend to a worse outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6089416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60894162018-08-30 The prognostic analysis of different metastatic patterns in advanced liver cancer patients: A population based analysis Chen, Jie PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of different distant metastases pattern in liver cancer is unexplored still now. The aim of this study is to analyze the metastasis patterns and prognosis differences for patients with stage IV liver cancers. METHODS: A SEER analysis was performed. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to further analyze survival outcome and other prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 37526 eligible cases were retrieved in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Among these patients, stage of IV liver cancer accounted for 14.80% (5555/37526) at initial diagnosis. Patients who suffered bone, brain or lung metastasis occupied 55.61% (3089/5555). Comparing with other two single metastases, the patients with brain metastasis exhibited worst overall survival whose mean of survival was 4.758 months. Multivariate analysis with Cox hazard regression model showed that metastatic site was an independent prognostic factor of overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with single metastasis (P<0.05). The results of univariate analysis showed that metastatic pattern was significantly correlated with overall survival (P = 0.038) and cancer-specific survival (P = 0.035) of patients with two sites. CONCLUSIONS: Lung was the most common site of single metastasis for liver cancers. Patients with bone metastasis had best survival outcome comparing with other two distant metastases. Patients with two metastatic sites, where one of them is the lung tends to have a slight trend to a worse outcome. Public Library of Science 2018-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6089416/ /pubmed/30102707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200909 Text en © 2018 Jie Chen http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Jie
The prognostic analysis of different metastatic patterns in advanced liver cancer patients: A population based analysis
title The prognostic analysis of different metastatic patterns in advanced liver cancer patients: A population based analysis
title_full The prognostic analysis of different metastatic patterns in advanced liver cancer patients: A population based analysis
title_fullStr The prognostic analysis of different metastatic patterns in advanced liver cancer patients: A population based analysis
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic analysis of different metastatic patterns in advanced liver cancer patients: A population based analysis
title_short The prognostic analysis of different metastatic patterns in advanced liver cancer patients: A population based analysis
title_sort prognostic analysis of different metastatic patterns in advanced liver cancer patients: a population based analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30102707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200909
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjie theprognosticanalysisofdifferentmetastaticpatternsinadvancedlivercancerpatientsapopulationbasedanalysis
AT chenjie prognosticanalysisofdifferentmetastaticpatternsinadvancedlivercancerpatientsapopulationbasedanalysis