Cargando…
A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey
BACKGROUND: Patient engagement helps to improve health outcomes and health care quality. However, the overall relationships among patient engagement measures and health outcomes remain unclear. This study aims to integrate expert knowledge and survey data for the identification of measures that have...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30102722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201355 |
_version_ | 1783347017216425984 |
---|---|
author | Chao, Yi-Sheng Scutari, Marco Chen, Tai-Shen Wu, Chao-Jung Durand, Madeleine Boivin, Antoine Wu, Hsing-Chien Chen, Wei-Chih |
author_facet | Chao, Yi-Sheng Scutari, Marco Chen, Tai-Shen Wu, Chao-Jung Durand, Madeleine Boivin, Antoine Wu, Hsing-Chien Chen, Wei-Chih |
author_sort | Chao, Yi-Sheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient engagement helps to improve health outcomes and health care quality. However, the overall relationships among patient engagement measures and health outcomes remain unclear. This study aims to integrate expert knowledge and survey data for the identification of measures that have extensive associations with other variables and can be prioritized to engage patients. METHODS: We used the 2014 International Health Policy Survey (IHPS), which provided information on elder adults in 11 countries with details in patient characteristics, healthcare experiences, and patient-physician communication. Patient engagement or support was measured with eight variables including patients’ treatment choices, involvement, and treatment priority setting. Three types of care were identified: primary, specialist and chronic illness care. Specialists were doctors specializing in one area of health care. Chronic illness included eight chronic conditions surveyed. Expert knowledge was used to assist variable selection. We used Bayesian network models consisting of nodes that represented variables of interest and arcs that represented their relationships. RESULTS: Among 25,530 participants, the mean age was 68.51 years and 57.40% were females. The distributions of age, sex, education, and patient engagement were significantly different across countries. For chronic illness care, written plans provided by professionals were linked to treatment feasibility and helpfulness. Whether professionals contacted patients was associated with the availability of professionals they could reach for chronic illness care. For specialist care, if specialists provided treatment choices, patients were more likely to be involved and discuss about what mattered to them. CONCLUSION: The strategies to engage patients may depend on the types of care, specialist or chronic illness care. For the study on the observational IHPS data, network modeling is useful to integrate expert knowledge. We suggest considering other theory-based patient engagement in major surveys, as well as engaging patients in their healthcare by providing written plans and actively communicating with patients for chronic illnesses, and encouraging specialists to discuss and provide treatment options. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6089423 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60894232018-08-30 A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey Chao, Yi-Sheng Scutari, Marco Chen, Tai-Shen Wu, Chao-Jung Durand, Madeleine Boivin, Antoine Wu, Hsing-Chien Chen, Wei-Chih PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient engagement helps to improve health outcomes and health care quality. However, the overall relationships among patient engagement measures and health outcomes remain unclear. This study aims to integrate expert knowledge and survey data for the identification of measures that have extensive associations with other variables and can be prioritized to engage patients. METHODS: We used the 2014 International Health Policy Survey (IHPS), which provided information on elder adults in 11 countries with details in patient characteristics, healthcare experiences, and patient-physician communication. Patient engagement or support was measured with eight variables including patients’ treatment choices, involvement, and treatment priority setting. Three types of care were identified: primary, specialist and chronic illness care. Specialists were doctors specializing in one area of health care. Chronic illness included eight chronic conditions surveyed. Expert knowledge was used to assist variable selection. We used Bayesian network models consisting of nodes that represented variables of interest and arcs that represented their relationships. RESULTS: Among 25,530 participants, the mean age was 68.51 years and 57.40% were females. The distributions of age, sex, education, and patient engagement were significantly different across countries. For chronic illness care, written plans provided by professionals were linked to treatment feasibility and helpfulness. Whether professionals contacted patients was associated with the availability of professionals they could reach for chronic illness care. For specialist care, if specialists provided treatment choices, patients were more likely to be involved and discuss about what mattered to them. CONCLUSION: The strategies to engage patients may depend on the types of care, specialist or chronic illness care. For the study on the observational IHPS data, network modeling is useful to integrate expert knowledge. We suggest considering other theory-based patient engagement in major surveys, as well as engaging patients in their healthcare by providing written plans and actively communicating with patients for chronic illnesses, and encouraging specialists to discuss and provide treatment options. Public Library of Science 2018-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6089423/ /pubmed/30102722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201355 Text en © 2018 Chao et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chao, Yi-Sheng Scutari, Marco Chen, Tai-Shen Wu, Chao-Jung Durand, Madeleine Boivin, Antoine Wu, Hsing-Chien Chen, Wei-Chih A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey |
title | A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey |
title_full | A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey |
title_fullStr | A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey |
title_short | A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey |
title_sort | network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: the 2014 international health policy survey |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30102722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201355 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaoyisheng anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey AT scutarimarco anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey AT chentaishen anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey AT wuchaojung anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey AT durandmadeleine anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey AT boivinantoine anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey AT wuhsingchien anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey AT chenweichih anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey AT chaoyisheng networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey AT scutarimarco networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey AT chentaishen networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey AT wuchaojung networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey AT durandmadeleine networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey AT boivinantoine networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey AT wuhsingchien networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey AT chenweichih networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey |