Cargando…

A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey

BACKGROUND: Patient engagement helps to improve health outcomes and health care quality. However, the overall relationships among patient engagement measures and health outcomes remain unclear. This study aims to integrate expert knowledge and survey data for the identification of measures that have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chao, Yi-Sheng, Scutari, Marco, Chen, Tai-Shen, Wu, Chao-Jung, Durand, Madeleine, Boivin, Antoine, Wu, Hsing-Chien, Chen, Wei-Chih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30102722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201355
_version_ 1783347017216425984
author Chao, Yi-Sheng
Scutari, Marco
Chen, Tai-Shen
Wu, Chao-Jung
Durand, Madeleine
Boivin, Antoine
Wu, Hsing-Chien
Chen, Wei-Chih
author_facet Chao, Yi-Sheng
Scutari, Marco
Chen, Tai-Shen
Wu, Chao-Jung
Durand, Madeleine
Boivin, Antoine
Wu, Hsing-Chien
Chen, Wei-Chih
author_sort Chao, Yi-Sheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient engagement helps to improve health outcomes and health care quality. However, the overall relationships among patient engagement measures and health outcomes remain unclear. This study aims to integrate expert knowledge and survey data for the identification of measures that have extensive associations with other variables and can be prioritized to engage patients. METHODS: We used the 2014 International Health Policy Survey (IHPS), which provided information on elder adults in 11 countries with details in patient characteristics, healthcare experiences, and patient-physician communication. Patient engagement or support was measured with eight variables including patients’ treatment choices, involvement, and treatment priority setting. Three types of care were identified: primary, specialist and chronic illness care. Specialists were doctors specializing in one area of health care. Chronic illness included eight chronic conditions surveyed. Expert knowledge was used to assist variable selection. We used Bayesian network models consisting of nodes that represented variables of interest and arcs that represented their relationships. RESULTS: Among 25,530 participants, the mean age was 68.51 years and 57.40% were females. The distributions of age, sex, education, and patient engagement were significantly different across countries. For chronic illness care, written plans provided by professionals were linked to treatment feasibility and helpfulness. Whether professionals contacted patients was associated with the availability of professionals they could reach for chronic illness care. For specialist care, if specialists provided treatment choices, patients were more likely to be involved and discuss about what mattered to them. CONCLUSION: The strategies to engage patients may depend on the types of care, specialist or chronic illness care. For the study on the observational IHPS data, network modeling is useful to integrate expert knowledge. We suggest considering other theory-based patient engagement in major surveys, as well as engaging patients in their healthcare by providing written plans and actively communicating with patients for chronic illnesses, and encouraging specialists to discuss and provide treatment options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6089423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60894232018-08-30 A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey Chao, Yi-Sheng Scutari, Marco Chen, Tai-Shen Wu, Chao-Jung Durand, Madeleine Boivin, Antoine Wu, Hsing-Chien Chen, Wei-Chih PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient engagement helps to improve health outcomes and health care quality. However, the overall relationships among patient engagement measures and health outcomes remain unclear. This study aims to integrate expert knowledge and survey data for the identification of measures that have extensive associations with other variables and can be prioritized to engage patients. METHODS: We used the 2014 International Health Policy Survey (IHPS), which provided information on elder adults in 11 countries with details in patient characteristics, healthcare experiences, and patient-physician communication. Patient engagement or support was measured with eight variables including patients’ treatment choices, involvement, and treatment priority setting. Three types of care were identified: primary, specialist and chronic illness care. Specialists were doctors specializing in one area of health care. Chronic illness included eight chronic conditions surveyed. Expert knowledge was used to assist variable selection. We used Bayesian network models consisting of nodes that represented variables of interest and arcs that represented their relationships. RESULTS: Among 25,530 participants, the mean age was 68.51 years and 57.40% were females. The distributions of age, sex, education, and patient engagement were significantly different across countries. For chronic illness care, written plans provided by professionals were linked to treatment feasibility and helpfulness. Whether professionals contacted patients was associated with the availability of professionals they could reach for chronic illness care. For specialist care, if specialists provided treatment choices, patients were more likely to be involved and discuss about what mattered to them. CONCLUSION: The strategies to engage patients may depend on the types of care, specialist or chronic illness care. For the study on the observational IHPS data, network modeling is useful to integrate expert knowledge. We suggest considering other theory-based patient engagement in major surveys, as well as engaging patients in their healthcare by providing written plans and actively communicating with patients for chronic illnesses, and encouraging specialists to discuss and provide treatment options. Public Library of Science 2018-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6089423/ /pubmed/30102722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201355 Text en © 2018 Chao et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chao, Yi-Sheng
Scutari, Marco
Chen, Tai-Shen
Wu, Chao-Jung
Durand, Madeleine
Boivin, Antoine
Wu, Hsing-Chien
Chen, Wei-Chih
A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey
title A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey
title_full A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey
title_fullStr A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey
title_full_unstemmed A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey
title_short A network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: The 2014 International Health Policy Survey
title_sort network perspective of engaging patients in specialist and chronic illness care: the 2014 international health policy survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30102722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201355
work_keys_str_mv AT chaoyisheng anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey
AT scutarimarco anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey
AT chentaishen anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey
AT wuchaojung anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey
AT durandmadeleine anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey
AT boivinantoine anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey
AT wuhsingchien anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey
AT chenweichih anetworkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey
AT chaoyisheng networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey
AT scutarimarco networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey
AT chentaishen networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey
AT wuchaojung networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey
AT durandmadeleine networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey
AT boivinantoine networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey
AT wuhsingchien networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey
AT chenweichih networkperspectiveofengagingpatientsinspecialistandchronicillnesscarethe2014internationalhealthpolicysurvey