Cargando…

The Impact of Implantation Time During Liver Transplantation on Outcome: A Eurotransplant Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: The liver graft quickly rewarms during transplantation when the vascular anastomoses are being performed, potentially impacting on outcomes. METHODS: We investigated the relationship between implantation time and outcome in 5223 recipients of deceased-donor livers transplanted in Eurotra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jochmans, Ina, Fieuws, Steffen, Tieken, Ineke, Samuel, Undine, Pirenne, Jacques
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000793
_version_ 1783347038115594240
author Jochmans, Ina
Fieuws, Steffen
Tieken, Ineke
Samuel, Undine
Pirenne, Jacques
author_facet Jochmans, Ina
Fieuws, Steffen
Tieken, Ineke
Samuel, Undine
Pirenne, Jacques
author_sort Jochmans, Ina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The liver graft quickly rewarms during transplantation when the vascular anastomoses are being performed, potentially impacting on outcomes. METHODS: We investigated the relationship between implantation time and outcome in 5223 recipients of deceased-donor livers transplanted in Eurotransplant (2004-2013). Cox regression analyses were corrected for donor, preservation, and recipient variables. Transplant loss represents all-cause graft failure. RESULTS: Median implantation time was 41 minutes (interquartile range, 34-51). Implantation time independently associated with transplant loss (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.04 for every 10-minute increase; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.07; P = 0.007). The magnitude of the implantation time effect was comparable to the effect of each additional hour of cold ischemia (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.05; P < 0.001). The effect was most pronounced early posttransplant with no evidence of a significant effect beyond 3 months. A similar detrimental effect of implantation time was seen for graft and patient survivals. The increased risk for transplant loss in livers donated after circulatory determination of death could be attributed to donor warm ischemia time. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation time associates with inferior liver transplant outcome in a continuous way. These findings need confirmation and further study of confounding factors is needed so steps toward improving outcomes can be made.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6089515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60895152018-08-17 The Impact of Implantation Time During Liver Transplantation on Outcome: A Eurotransplant Cohort Study Jochmans, Ina Fieuws, Steffen Tieken, Ineke Samuel, Undine Pirenne, Jacques Transplant Direct Liver Transplantation BACKGROUND: The liver graft quickly rewarms during transplantation when the vascular anastomoses are being performed, potentially impacting on outcomes. METHODS: We investigated the relationship between implantation time and outcome in 5223 recipients of deceased-donor livers transplanted in Eurotransplant (2004-2013). Cox regression analyses were corrected for donor, preservation, and recipient variables. Transplant loss represents all-cause graft failure. RESULTS: Median implantation time was 41 minutes (interquartile range, 34-51). Implantation time independently associated with transplant loss (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.04 for every 10-minute increase; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.07; P = 0.007). The magnitude of the implantation time effect was comparable to the effect of each additional hour of cold ischemia (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.05; P < 0.001). The effect was most pronounced early posttransplant with no evidence of a significant effect beyond 3 months. A similar detrimental effect of implantation time was seen for graft and patient survivals. The increased risk for transplant loss in livers donated after circulatory determination of death could be attributed to donor warm ischemia time. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation time associates with inferior liver transplant outcome in a continuous way. These findings need confirmation and further study of confounding factors is needed so steps toward improving outcomes can be made. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6089515/ /pubmed/30123829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000793 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Liver Transplantation
Jochmans, Ina
Fieuws, Steffen
Tieken, Ineke
Samuel, Undine
Pirenne, Jacques
The Impact of Implantation Time During Liver Transplantation on Outcome: A Eurotransplant Cohort Study
title The Impact of Implantation Time During Liver Transplantation on Outcome: A Eurotransplant Cohort Study
title_full The Impact of Implantation Time During Liver Transplantation on Outcome: A Eurotransplant Cohort Study
title_fullStr The Impact of Implantation Time During Liver Transplantation on Outcome: A Eurotransplant Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Implantation Time During Liver Transplantation on Outcome: A Eurotransplant Cohort Study
title_short The Impact of Implantation Time During Liver Transplantation on Outcome: A Eurotransplant Cohort Study
title_sort impact of implantation time during liver transplantation on outcome: a eurotransplant cohort study
topic Liver Transplantation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6089515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000793
work_keys_str_mv AT jochmansina theimpactofimplantationtimeduringlivertransplantationonoutcomeaeurotransplantcohortstudy
AT fieuwssteffen theimpactofimplantationtimeduringlivertransplantationonoutcomeaeurotransplantcohortstudy
AT tiekenineke theimpactofimplantationtimeduringlivertransplantationonoutcomeaeurotransplantcohortstudy
AT samuelundine theimpactofimplantationtimeduringlivertransplantationonoutcomeaeurotransplantcohortstudy
AT pirennejacques theimpactofimplantationtimeduringlivertransplantationonoutcomeaeurotransplantcohortstudy
AT jochmansina impactofimplantationtimeduringlivertransplantationonoutcomeaeurotransplantcohortstudy
AT fieuwssteffen impactofimplantationtimeduringlivertransplantationonoutcomeaeurotransplantcohortstudy
AT tiekenineke impactofimplantationtimeduringlivertransplantationonoutcomeaeurotransplantcohortstudy
AT samuelundine impactofimplantationtimeduringlivertransplantationonoutcomeaeurotransplantcohortstudy
AT pirennejacques impactofimplantationtimeduringlivertransplantationonoutcomeaeurotransplantcohortstudy