Cargando…

3-NOP vs. Halogenated Compound: Methane Production, Ruminal Fermentation and Microbial Community Response in Forage Fed Cattle

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) and chloroform on methane (CH(4)) and H(2) production, ruminal metabolites and microbial community structure in cattle fed a tropical forage diet. Eight rumen-fistulated steers were fed a roughage hay diet (Rhodes gra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martinez-Fernandez, Gonzalo, Duval, Stephane, Kindermann, Maik, Schirra, Horst J., Denman, Stuart E., McSweeney, Christopher S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30131771
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01582
_version_ 1783347126873358336
author Martinez-Fernandez, Gonzalo
Duval, Stephane
Kindermann, Maik
Schirra, Horst J.
Denman, Stuart E.
McSweeney, Christopher S.
author_facet Martinez-Fernandez, Gonzalo
Duval, Stephane
Kindermann, Maik
Schirra, Horst J.
Denman, Stuart E.
McSweeney, Christopher S.
author_sort Martinez-Fernandez, Gonzalo
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) and chloroform on methane (CH(4)) and H(2) production, ruminal metabolites and microbial community structure in cattle fed a tropical forage diet. Eight rumen-fistulated steers were fed a roughage hay diet (Rhodes grass; Chloris gayana) for 31 days (control period). Four animals received the antimethanogenic compound chloroform (1.6 g chloroform–cyclodextrin/100 kg live weight (LW)) while the other four received 3-NOP (2.5 g 3-NOP/animal/day) for 21 days. Methane decrease compared with control period was similar for both treatments (30–38%) with no differences for expelled H(2) between controls and treatments. Daily weight gain (DWG) was significantly increased when animals were treated with 3-NOP compared with chloroform and control. Regarding the ruminal fermentation parameters increases in ammonia, acetate and branched chain fatty acids were observed with both compounds compared with the controls. Also, methylamines, alcohols and dimethyl sulfone (DMSO(2)) concentrations were significantly increased with the treatments compared with control, being greater with 3-NOP. The rumen microbial analyses revealed a similar profile for both treatments, with a shift in operational taxonomic units (OTUs) assigned to the Prevotellaceae and Campylobacteraceae family. Moreover, major archaeal OTUs associated with Methanobrevibacter and Methanosphaera were significantly affected to varying extents based on the inhibitory treatments compared to the control. The abundance of the Methanobrevibacter spp. was decreased by 3-NOP and chloroform, while the Methanomassiliicoccaceae family was inhibited only by 3-NOP. The results suggest that despite the specific mode of action of 3-NOP on methanogens, inhibition of methanogenesis by both compounds resulted in similar responses in metabolism and microbial community structure in the rumen. We hypothesized that these changes were driven by the redirection of metabolic hydrogen ([H]) by both treatments. Therefore results from previous publications using chloroform as an inhibitor of methanogenesis may be useful in predicting ruminal microbiota and fermentation responses to 3-NOP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6090035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60900352018-08-21 3-NOP vs. Halogenated Compound: Methane Production, Ruminal Fermentation and Microbial Community Response in Forage Fed Cattle Martinez-Fernandez, Gonzalo Duval, Stephane Kindermann, Maik Schirra, Horst J. Denman, Stuart E. McSweeney, Christopher S. Front Microbiol Microbiology The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) and chloroform on methane (CH(4)) and H(2) production, ruminal metabolites and microbial community structure in cattle fed a tropical forage diet. Eight rumen-fistulated steers were fed a roughage hay diet (Rhodes grass; Chloris gayana) for 31 days (control period). Four animals received the antimethanogenic compound chloroform (1.6 g chloroform–cyclodextrin/100 kg live weight (LW)) while the other four received 3-NOP (2.5 g 3-NOP/animal/day) for 21 days. Methane decrease compared with control period was similar for both treatments (30–38%) with no differences for expelled H(2) between controls and treatments. Daily weight gain (DWG) was significantly increased when animals were treated with 3-NOP compared with chloroform and control. Regarding the ruminal fermentation parameters increases in ammonia, acetate and branched chain fatty acids were observed with both compounds compared with the controls. Also, methylamines, alcohols and dimethyl sulfone (DMSO(2)) concentrations were significantly increased with the treatments compared with control, being greater with 3-NOP. The rumen microbial analyses revealed a similar profile for both treatments, with a shift in operational taxonomic units (OTUs) assigned to the Prevotellaceae and Campylobacteraceae family. Moreover, major archaeal OTUs associated with Methanobrevibacter and Methanosphaera were significantly affected to varying extents based on the inhibitory treatments compared to the control. The abundance of the Methanobrevibacter spp. was decreased by 3-NOP and chloroform, while the Methanomassiliicoccaceae family was inhibited only by 3-NOP. The results suggest that despite the specific mode of action of 3-NOP on methanogens, inhibition of methanogenesis by both compounds resulted in similar responses in metabolism and microbial community structure in the rumen. We hypothesized that these changes were driven by the redirection of metabolic hydrogen ([H]) by both treatments. Therefore results from previous publications using chloroform as an inhibitor of methanogenesis may be useful in predicting ruminal microbiota and fermentation responses to 3-NOP. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6090035/ /pubmed/30131771 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01582 Text en Copyright © 2018 Martinez-Fernandez, Duval, Kindermann, Schirra, Denman and McSweeney. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Martinez-Fernandez, Gonzalo
Duval, Stephane
Kindermann, Maik
Schirra, Horst J.
Denman, Stuart E.
McSweeney, Christopher S.
3-NOP vs. Halogenated Compound: Methane Production, Ruminal Fermentation and Microbial Community Response in Forage Fed Cattle
title 3-NOP vs. Halogenated Compound: Methane Production, Ruminal Fermentation and Microbial Community Response in Forage Fed Cattle
title_full 3-NOP vs. Halogenated Compound: Methane Production, Ruminal Fermentation and Microbial Community Response in Forage Fed Cattle
title_fullStr 3-NOP vs. Halogenated Compound: Methane Production, Ruminal Fermentation and Microbial Community Response in Forage Fed Cattle
title_full_unstemmed 3-NOP vs. Halogenated Compound: Methane Production, Ruminal Fermentation and Microbial Community Response in Forage Fed Cattle
title_short 3-NOP vs. Halogenated Compound: Methane Production, Ruminal Fermentation and Microbial Community Response in Forage Fed Cattle
title_sort 3-nop vs. halogenated compound: methane production, ruminal fermentation and microbial community response in forage fed cattle
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30131771
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01582
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezfernandezgonzalo 3nopvshalogenatedcompoundmethaneproductionruminalfermentationandmicrobialcommunityresponseinforagefedcattle
AT duvalstephane 3nopvshalogenatedcompoundmethaneproductionruminalfermentationandmicrobialcommunityresponseinforagefedcattle
AT kindermannmaik 3nopvshalogenatedcompoundmethaneproductionruminalfermentationandmicrobialcommunityresponseinforagefedcattle
AT schirrahorstj 3nopvshalogenatedcompoundmethaneproductionruminalfermentationandmicrobialcommunityresponseinforagefedcattle
AT denmanstuarte 3nopvshalogenatedcompoundmethaneproductionruminalfermentationandmicrobialcommunityresponseinforagefedcattle
AT mcsweeneychristophers 3nopvshalogenatedcompoundmethaneproductionruminalfermentationandmicrobialcommunityresponseinforagefedcattle