Cargando…

Echocardiogram-guided resuscitation versus early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of septic shock: a randomized, controlled, feasibility trial

OBJECTIVE: Echocardiography is often used to guide septic shock resuscitation, but without evidence for efficacy. We conducted an intensive care unit (ICU)-based randomized controlled feasibility trial comparing echocardiography-guided septic shock resuscitation (ECHO) with early goal-directed thera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lanspa, Michael J., Burk, Rebecca E., Wilson, Emily L., Hirshberg, Eliotte L., Grissom, Colin K., Brown, Samuel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0319-3
_version_ 1783347216099835904
author Lanspa, Michael J.
Burk, Rebecca E.
Wilson, Emily L.
Hirshberg, Eliotte L.
Grissom, Colin K.
Brown, Samuel M.
author_facet Lanspa, Michael J.
Burk, Rebecca E.
Wilson, Emily L.
Hirshberg, Eliotte L.
Grissom, Colin K.
Brown, Samuel M.
author_sort Lanspa, Michael J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Echocardiography is often used to guide septic shock resuscitation, but without evidence for efficacy. We conducted an intensive care unit (ICU)-based randomized controlled feasibility trial comparing echocardiography-guided septic shock resuscitation (ECHO) with early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). METHODS: We conducted a single center, randomized controlled feasibility trial at a 468-bed academic tertiary care center in Utah, USA. Adult patients with early septic shock were assessed and treated at defined intervals over 6 h using an echocardiogram-guided resuscitation protocol or a slightly modified EGDT protocol. Feasibility outcomes were fluid balance, dobutamine administration, and time to lactate clearance. The primary clinical outcome was changed in sequential organ failure assessment score at 48 h (delta SOFA). Secondary outcomes included inpatient mortality, ICU-free days, and ventilator-free days at 28 days. RESULTS: Thirty participants, 15 per group, were randomized and completed the study. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Patients were randomized within a median of 3.5 h of meeting inclusion criteria but had received a median of 3 L crystalloid by then. Fluid administration during the study protocol was similar in both groups (median ECHO 0 vs EGDT 1 L, p = 0.61). Eleven (73%) subjects in each arm received ≤ 1 L fluid. Dobutamine administration was also similar (20% vs 13%, p > 0.99). Twenty-one patients (70%) had lactate clearance prior to the first study assessment. No difference was observed in delta SOFA (median − 4 for ECHO vs − 6 for EGDT, p = 0.10) nor mortality (33% ECHO vs 20% EGDT, p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: No experimental separation was observed in this randomized, controlled feasibility trial. Early lactate clearance, coupled with substantial fluid administration before randomization, suggests that patients were already resuscitated before arrival in the ICU. Future trials of echocardiogram-guided sepsis resuscitation will likely need to enroll in the emergency department. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT02354742, title Echo vs EGDT in severe sepsis and septic shock) on February 3, 2015. Registration was completed before review or analysis of any data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40560-018-0319-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6090604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60906042018-08-17 Echocardiogram-guided resuscitation versus early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of septic shock: a randomized, controlled, feasibility trial Lanspa, Michael J. Burk, Rebecca E. Wilson, Emily L. Hirshberg, Eliotte L. Grissom, Colin K. Brown, Samuel M. J Intensive Care Research OBJECTIVE: Echocardiography is often used to guide septic shock resuscitation, but without evidence for efficacy. We conducted an intensive care unit (ICU)-based randomized controlled feasibility trial comparing echocardiography-guided septic shock resuscitation (ECHO) with early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). METHODS: We conducted a single center, randomized controlled feasibility trial at a 468-bed academic tertiary care center in Utah, USA. Adult patients with early septic shock were assessed and treated at defined intervals over 6 h using an echocardiogram-guided resuscitation protocol or a slightly modified EGDT protocol. Feasibility outcomes were fluid balance, dobutamine administration, and time to lactate clearance. The primary clinical outcome was changed in sequential organ failure assessment score at 48 h (delta SOFA). Secondary outcomes included inpatient mortality, ICU-free days, and ventilator-free days at 28 days. RESULTS: Thirty participants, 15 per group, were randomized and completed the study. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Patients were randomized within a median of 3.5 h of meeting inclusion criteria but had received a median of 3 L crystalloid by then. Fluid administration during the study protocol was similar in both groups (median ECHO 0 vs EGDT 1 L, p = 0.61). Eleven (73%) subjects in each arm received ≤ 1 L fluid. Dobutamine administration was also similar (20% vs 13%, p > 0.99). Twenty-one patients (70%) had lactate clearance prior to the first study assessment. No difference was observed in delta SOFA (median − 4 for ECHO vs − 6 for EGDT, p = 0.10) nor mortality (33% ECHO vs 20% EGDT, p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: No experimental separation was observed in this randomized, controlled feasibility trial. Early lactate clearance, coupled with substantial fluid administration before randomization, suggests that patients were already resuscitated before arrival in the ICU. Future trials of echocardiogram-guided sepsis resuscitation will likely need to enroll in the emergency department. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT02354742, title Echo vs EGDT in severe sepsis and septic shock) on February 3, 2015. Registration was completed before review or analysis of any data. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40560-018-0319-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6090604/ /pubmed/30123511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0319-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lanspa, Michael J.
Burk, Rebecca E.
Wilson, Emily L.
Hirshberg, Eliotte L.
Grissom, Colin K.
Brown, Samuel M.
Echocardiogram-guided resuscitation versus early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of septic shock: a randomized, controlled, feasibility trial
title Echocardiogram-guided resuscitation versus early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of septic shock: a randomized, controlled, feasibility trial
title_full Echocardiogram-guided resuscitation versus early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of septic shock: a randomized, controlled, feasibility trial
title_fullStr Echocardiogram-guided resuscitation versus early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of septic shock: a randomized, controlled, feasibility trial
title_full_unstemmed Echocardiogram-guided resuscitation versus early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of septic shock: a randomized, controlled, feasibility trial
title_short Echocardiogram-guided resuscitation versus early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of septic shock: a randomized, controlled, feasibility trial
title_sort echocardiogram-guided resuscitation versus early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of septic shock: a randomized, controlled, feasibility trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0319-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lanspamichaelj echocardiogramguidedresuscitationversusearlygoaldirectedtherapyinthetreatmentofsepticshockarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitytrial
AT burkrebeccae echocardiogramguidedresuscitationversusearlygoaldirectedtherapyinthetreatmentofsepticshockarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitytrial
AT wilsonemilyl echocardiogramguidedresuscitationversusearlygoaldirectedtherapyinthetreatmentofsepticshockarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitytrial
AT hirshbergeliottel echocardiogramguidedresuscitationversusearlygoaldirectedtherapyinthetreatmentofsepticshockarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitytrial
AT grissomcolink echocardiogramguidedresuscitationversusearlygoaldirectedtherapyinthetreatmentofsepticshockarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitytrial
AT brownsamuelm echocardiogramguidedresuscitationversusearlygoaldirectedtherapyinthetreatmentofsepticshockarandomizedcontrolledfeasibilitytrial