Cargando…

Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery

BACKGROUND: There is growing recognition that the wider benefits of research (economic, social and health impacts) should be assessed and valued alongside traditional research performance metrics such as peer-reviewed papers. Translation of findings into policy and practice needs to accelerate and p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramanathan, Shanthi, Reeves, Penny, Deeming, Simon, Bernhardt, Julie, Nilsson, Michael, Cadilhac, Dominique A., Walker, Frederick Rohan, Carey, Leeanne, Middleton, Sandy, Lynch, Elizabeth, Searles, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30068358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0349-2
_version_ 1783347219405996032
author Ramanathan, Shanthi
Reeves, Penny
Deeming, Simon
Bernhardt, Julie
Nilsson, Michael
Cadilhac, Dominique A.
Walker, Frederick Rohan
Carey, Leeanne
Middleton, Sandy
Lynch, Elizabeth
Searles, Andrew
author_facet Ramanathan, Shanthi
Reeves, Penny
Deeming, Simon
Bernhardt, Julie
Nilsson, Michael
Cadilhac, Dominique A.
Walker, Frederick Rohan
Carey, Leeanne
Middleton, Sandy
Lynch, Elizabeth
Searles, Andrew
author_sort Ramanathan, Shanthi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is growing recognition that the wider benefits of research (economic, social and health impacts) should be assessed and valued alongside traditional research performance metrics such as peer-reviewed papers. Translation of findings into policy and practice needs to accelerate and pathways to impact need to be better understood. This research protocol outlines a mixed methods study to apply the Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) to the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery (CRE-Stroke). FAIT is purpose-designed to encourage research translation and assess research impact but lacks validation. METHODS/DESIGN: Phase 1 involves application of the FAIT-modified programme logic model to each CRE-Stroke research stream including identifying process, output and impact metrics, as well as end users of the research. A scoping review will inform potential impacts anticipated from CRE-Stroke. In Phase 2, audit and feedback on achievements against plans will track and encourage research translation. Logic models will be updated to account for changes in the research pathways over time. In Phase 3, three proven methods for measuring research impact – Payback, economic assessment and narratives – will be applied to each research stream and the data triangulated and reported in Phase 4. The feasibility of applying FAIT will also be assessed as part of Phase 3. DISCUSSION: Use of prospective, comprehensive research impact frameworks for large interdisciplinary programmes of research is rare. FAIT’s application to CRE-Stroke will provide opportunity for the impact of CRE-Stroke to be assessed and a range of impacts beyond standard academic achievements to be reliably reported. The feasibility of FAIT’s application will also be assessed and, if necessary, refined. The usefulness of FAIT for encouraging research translation will also be described and may prove useful for other programmes looking to implement a research impact framework.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6090618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60906182018-08-17 Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery Ramanathan, Shanthi Reeves, Penny Deeming, Simon Bernhardt, Julie Nilsson, Michael Cadilhac, Dominique A. Walker, Frederick Rohan Carey, Leeanne Middleton, Sandy Lynch, Elizabeth Searles, Andrew Health Res Policy Syst Study Protocol BACKGROUND: There is growing recognition that the wider benefits of research (economic, social and health impacts) should be assessed and valued alongside traditional research performance metrics such as peer-reviewed papers. Translation of findings into policy and practice needs to accelerate and pathways to impact need to be better understood. This research protocol outlines a mixed methods study to apply the Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) to the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery (CRE-Stroke). FAIT is purpose-designed to encourage research translation and assess research impact but lacks validation. METHODS/DESIGN: Phase 1 involves application of the FAIT-modified programme logic model to each CRE-Stroke research stream including identifying process, output and impact metrics, as well as end users of the research. A scoping review will inform potential impacts anticipated from CRE-Stroke. In Phase 2, audit and feedback on achievements against plans will track and encourage research translation. Logic models will be updated to account for changes in the research pathways over time. In Phase 3, three proven methods for measuring research impact – Payback, economic assessment and narratives – will be applied to each research stream and the data triangulated and reported in Phase 4. The feasibility of applying FAIT will also be assessed as part of Phase 3. DISCUSSION: Use of prospective, comprehensive research impact frameworks for large interdisciplinary programmes of research is rare. FAIT’s application to CRE-Stroke will provide opportunity for the impact of CRE-Stroke to be assessed and a range of impacts beyond standard academic achievements to be reliably reported. The feasibility of FAIT’s application will also be assessed and, if necessary, refined. The usefulness of FAIT for encouraging research translation will also be described and may prove useful for other programmes looking to implement a research impact framework. BioMed Central 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6090618/ /pubmed/30068358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0349-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Ramanathan, Shanthi
Reeves, Penny
Deeming, Simon
Bernhardt, Julie
Nilsson, Michael
Cadilhac, Dominique A.
Walker, Frederick Rohan
Carey, Leeanne
Middleton, Sandy
Lynch, Elizabeth
Searles, Andrew
Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
title Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
title_full Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
title_fullStr Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
title_full_unstemmed Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
title_short Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
title_sort implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the centre for research excellence in stroke rehabilitation and brain recovery
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30068358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0349-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ramanathanshanthi implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT reevespenny implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT deemingsimon implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT bernhardtjulie implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT nilssonmichael implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT cadilhacdominiquea implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT walkerfrederickrohan implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT careyleeanne implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT middletonsandy implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT lynchelizabeth implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery
AT searlesandrew implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery