Cargando…
Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery
BACKGROUND: There is growing recognition that the wider benefits of research (economic, social and health impacts) should be assessed and valued alongside traditional research performance metrics such as peer-reviewed papers. Translation of findings into policy and practice needs to accelerate and p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30068358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0349-2 |
_version_ | 1783347219405996032 |
---|---|
author | Ramanathan, Shanthi Reeves, Penny Deeming, Simon Bernhardt, Julie Nilsson, Michael Cadilhac, Dominique A. Walker, Frederick Rohan Carey, Leeanne Middleton, Sandy Lynch, Elizabeth Searles, Andrew |
author_facet | Ramanathan, Shanthi Reeves, Penny Deeming, Simon Bernhardt, Julie Nilsson, Michael Cadilhac, Dominique A. Walker, Frederick Rohan Carey, Leeanne Middleton, Sandy Lynch, Elizabeth Searles, Andrew |
author_sort | Ramanathan, Shanthi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is growing recognition that the wider benefits of research (economic, social and health impacts) should be assessed and valued alongside traditional research performance metrics such as peer-reviewed papers. Translation of findings into policy and practice needs to accelerate and pathways to impact need to be better understood. This research protocol outlines a mixed methods study to apply the Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) to the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery (CRE-Stroke). FAIT is purpose-designed to encourage research translation and assess research impact but lacks validation. METHODS/DESIGN: Phase 1 involves application of the FAIT-modified programme logic model to each CRE-Stroke research stream including identifying process, output and impact metrics, as well as end users of the research. A scoping review will inform potential impacts anticipated from CRE-Stroke. In Phase 2, audit and feedback on achievements against plans will track and encourage research translation. Logic models will be updated to account for changes in the research pathways over time. In Phase 3, three proven methods for measuring research impact – Payback, economic assessment and narratives – will be applied to each research stream and the data triangulated and reported in Phase 4. The feasibility of applying FAIT will also be assessed as part of Phase 3. DISCUSSION: Use of prospective, comprehensive research impact frameworks for large interdisciplinary programmes of research is rare. FAIT’s application to CRE-Stroke will provide opportunity for the impact of CRE-Stroke to be assessed and a range of impacts beyond standard academic achievements to be reliably reported. The feasibility of FAIT’s application will also be assessed and, if necessary, refined. The usefulness of FAIT for encouraging research translation will also be described and may prove useful for other programmes looking to implement a research impact framework. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6090618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60906182018-08-17 Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery Ramanathan, Shanthi Reeves, Penny Deeming, Simon Bernhardt, Julie Nilsson, Michael Cadilhac, Dominique A. Walker, Frederick Rohan Carey, Leeanne Middleton, Sandy Lynch, Elizabeth Searles, Andrew Health Res Policy Syst Study Protocol BACKGROUND: There is growing recognition that the wider benefits of research (economic, social and health impacts) should be assessed and valued alongside traditional research performance metrics such as peer-reviewed papers. Translation of findings into policy and practice needs to accelerate and pathways to impact need to be better understood. This research protocol outlines a mixed methods study to apply the Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) to the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery (CRE-Stroke). FAIT is purpose-designed to encourage research translation and assess research impact but lacks validation. METHODS/DESIGN: Phase 1 involves application of the FAIT-modified programme logic model to each CRE-Stroke research stream including identifying process, output and impact metrics, as well as end users of the research. A scoping review will inform potential impacts anticipated from CRE-Stroke. In Phase 2, audit and feedback on achievements against plans will track and encourage research translation. Logic models will be updated to account for changes in the research pathways over time. In Phase 3, three proven methods for measuring research impact – Payback, economic assessment and narratives – will be applied to each research stream and the data triangulated and reported in Phase 4. The feasibility of applying FAIT will also be assessed as part of Phase 3. DISCUSSION: Use of prospective, comprehensive research impact frameworks for large interdisciplinary programmes of research is rare. FAIT’s application to CRE-Stroke will provide opportunity for the impact of CRE-Stroke to be assessed and a range of impacts beyond standard academic achievements to be reliably reported. The feasibility of FAIT’s application will also be assessed and, if necessary, refined. The usefulness of FAIT for encouraging research translation will also be described and may prove useful for other programmes looking to implement a research impact framework. BioMed Central 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6090618/ /pubmed/30068358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0349-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Ramanathan, Shanthi Reeves, Penny Deeming, Simon Bernhardt, Julie Nilsson, Michael Cadilhac, Dominique A. Walker, Frederick Rohan Carey, Leeanne Middleton, Sandy Lynch, Elizabeth Searles, Andrew Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery |
title | Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery |
title_full | Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery |
title_fullStr | Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery |
title_short | Implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the Centre for Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery |
title_sort | implementing a protocol for a research impact assessment of the centre for research excellence in stroke rehabilitation and brain recovery |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30068358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0349-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramanathanshanthi implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT reevespenny implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT deemingsimon implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT bernhardtjulie implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT nilssonmichael implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT cadilhacdominiquea implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT walkerfrederickrohan implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT careyleeanne implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT middletonsandy implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT lynchelizabeth implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery AT searlesandrew implementingaprotocolforaresearchimpactassessmentofthecentreforresearchexcellenceinstrokerehabilitationandbrainrecovery |