Cargando…

Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of occlusion treatment for anisometropic amblyopia using multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs). METHODS: The patients for this study comprised 19 patients (mean age 6.05 ± 1.65 years) with anisometropic amblyopia underwent mfVEP analysis using the RETIscan®...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jang, Junwon, Kyung, Sungeun E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30103718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0877-0
_version_ 1783347231257001984
author Jang, Junwon
Kyung, Sungeun E.
author_facet Jang, Junwon
Kyung, Sungeun E.
author_sort Jang, Junwon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of occlusion treatment for anisometropic amblyopia using multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs). METHODS: The patients for this study comprised 19 patients (mean age 6.05 ± 1.65 years) with anisometropic amblyopia underwent mfVEP analysis using the RETIscan® system before and after occlusion treatment. After dividing the area into six ring areas and four quadrants, we analyzed the amplitudes and latencies of the mfVEPs. RESULTS: The amplitudes of ring 1 (central field) in amblyopic eyes after treatment were significantly higher than those in the other rings (p = 0.001). The mfVEP amplitudes in each of the six rings between amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes at diagnosis and after occlusion treatment showed no significant differences. In quadrant 1 the amplitudes of the amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes were significantly different at the time of diagnosis (p = 0.005), whereas after occlusion treatment there was no significant difference (p = 0.888). The amplitudes for each of the six rings at diagnosis and after occlusion treatment in amblyopic eyes versus fellow eyes showed no significant difference. There were also no differences in the amplitudes in each of the four quadrants at the time of diagnosis and after occlusion treatment in amblyopic eyes versus fellow eyes. No significant difference was found in the comparison of latency values in each of the six rings or in each of the four quadrants at diagnosis and after occlusion treatment in amblyopic eyes versus their fellow eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The amplitudes of quadrant 1 in amblyopic eyes compared with those of the fellow eyes at diagnosis were increased after occlusion treatment. Changes of the difference between amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes in quadrant 1 after occlusion treatment could be a useful, objective method for monitoring improvement in visual acuity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12886-018-0877-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6090668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60906682018-08-17 Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials Jang, Junwon Kyung, Sungeun E. BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of occlusion treatment for anisometropic amblyopia using multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs). METHODS: The patients for this study comprised 19 patients (mean age 6.05 ± 1.65 years) with anisometropic amblyopia underwent mfVEP analysis using the RETIscan® system before and after occlusion treatment. After dividing the area into six ring areas and four quadrants, we analyzed the amplitudes and latencies of the mfVEPs. RESULTS: The amplitudes of ring 1 (central field) in amblyopic eyes after treatment were significantly higher than those in the other rings (p = 0.001). The mfVEP amplitudes in each of the six rings between amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes at diagnosis and after occlusion treatment showed no significant differences. In quadrant 1 the amplitudes of the amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes were significantly different at the time of diagnosis (p = 0.005), whereas after occlusion treatment there was no significant difference (p = 0.888). The amplitudes for each of the six rings at diagnosis and after occlusion treatment in amblyopic eyes versus fellow eyes showed no significant difference. There were also no differences in the amplitudes in each of the four quadrants at the time of diagnosis and after occlusion treatment in amblyopic eyes versus fellow eyes. No significant difference was found in the comparison of latency values in each of the six rings or in each of the four quadrants at diagnosis and after occlusion treatment in amblyopic eyes versus their fellow eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The amplitudes of quadrant 1 in amblyopic eyes compared with those of the fellow eyes at diagnosis were increased after occlusion treatment. Changes of the difference between amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes in quadrant 1 after occlusion treatment could be a useful, objective method for monitoring improvement in visual acuity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12886-018-0877-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6090668/ /pubmed/30103718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0877-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jang, Junwon
Kyung, Sungeun E.
Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials
title Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials
title_full Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials
title_fullStr Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials
title_full_unstemmed Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials
title_short Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials
title_sort assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30103718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0877-0
work_keys_str_mv AT jangjunwon assessingamblyopiatreatmentusingmultifocalvisualevokedpotentials
AT kyungsungeune assessingamblyopiatreatmentusingmultifocalvisualevokedpotentials