Cargando…
Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of occlusion treatment for anisometropic amblyopia using multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs). METHODS: The patients for this study comprised 19 patients (mean age 6.05 ± 1.65 years) with anisometropic amblyopia underwent mfVEP analysis using the RETIscan®...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30103718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0877-0 |
_version_ | 1783347231257001984 |
---|---|
author | Jang, Junwon Kyung, Sungeun E. |
author_facet | Jang, Junwon Kyung, Sungeun E. |
author_sort | Jang, Junwon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of occlusion treatment for anisometropic amblyopia using multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs). METHODS: The patients for this study comprised 19 patients (mean age 6.05 ± 1.65 years) with anisometropic amblyopia underwent mfVEP analysis using the RETIscan® system before and after occlusion treatment. After dividing the area into six ring areas and four quadrants, we analyzed the amplitudes and latencies of the mfVEPs. RESULTS: The amplitudes of ring 1 (central field) in amblyopic eyes after treatment were significantly higher than those in the other rings (p = 0.001). The mfVEP amplitudes in each of the six rings between amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes at diagnosis and after occlusion treatment showed no significant differences. In quadrant 1 the amplitudes of the amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes were significantly different at the time of diagnosis (p = 0.005), whereas after occlusion treatment there was no significant difference (p = 0.888). The amplitudes for each of the six rings at diagnosis and after occlusion treatment in amblyopic eyes versus fellow eyes showed no significant difference. There were also no differences in the amplitudes in each of the four quadrants at the time of diagnosis and after occlusion treatment in amblyopic eyes versus fellow eyes. No significant difference was found in the comparison of latency values in each of the six rings or in each of the four quadrants at diagnosis and after occlusion treatment in amblyopic eyes versus their fellow eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The amplitudes of quadrant 1 in amblyopic eyes compared with those of the fellow eyes at diagnosis were increased after occlusion treatment. Changes of the difference between amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes in quadrant 1 after occlusion treatment could be a useful, objective method for monitoring improvement in visual acuity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12886-018-0877-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6090668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60906682018-08-17 Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials Jang, Junwon Kyung, Sungeun E. BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of occlusion treatment for anisometropic amblyopia using multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEPs). METHODS: The patients for this study comprised 19 patients (mean age 6.05 ± 1.65 years) with anisometropic amblyopia underwent mfVEP analysis using the RETIscan® system before and after occlusion treatment. After dividing the area into six ring areas and four quadrants, we analyzed the amplitudes and latencies of the mfVEPs. RESULTS: The amplitudes of ring 1 (central field) in amblyopic eyes after treatment were significantly higher than those in the other rings (p = 0.001). The mfVEP amplitudes in each of the six rings between amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes at diagnosis and after occlusion treatment showed no significant differences. In quadrant 1 the amplitudes of the amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes were significantly different at the time of diagnosis (p = 0.005), whereas after occlusion treatment there was no significant difference (p = 0.888). The amplitudes for each of the six rings at diagnosis and after occlusion treatment in amblyopic eyes versus fellow eyes showed no significant difference. There were also no differences in the amplitudes in each of the four quadrants at the time of diagnosis and after occlusion treatment in amblyopic eyes versus fellow eyes. No significant difference was found in the comparison of latency values in each of the six rings or in each of the four quadrants at diagnosis and after occlusion treatment in amblyopic eyes versus their fellow eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The amplitudes of quadrant 1 in amblyopic eyes compared with those of the fellow eyes at diagnosis were increased after occlusion treatment. Changes of the difference between amblyopic eyes and fellow eyes in quadrant 1 after occlusion treatment could be a useful, objective method for monitoring improvement in visual acuity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12886-018-0877-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6090668/ /pubmed/30103718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0877-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jang, Junwon Kyung, Sungeun E. Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials |
title | Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials |
title_full | Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials |
title_fullStr | Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials |
title_short | Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials |
title_sort | assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30103718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0877-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jangjunwon assessingamblyopiatreatmentusingmultifocalvisualevokedpotentials AT kyungsungeune assessingamblyopiatreatmentusingmultifocalvisualevokedpotentials |