Cargando…

Pilot and feasibility studies in exercise, physical activity, or rehabilitation research

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of physical activity and rehabilitation interventions can be challenging. Pilot or feasibility studies can be conducted prior to a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT), to improve the chances of conducting a high-quality RCT of a physical activity intervention. MA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Kotob, Rasha, Giangregorio, Lora M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0326-0
_version_ 1783347239996882944
author El-Kotob, Rasha
Giangregorio, Lora M.
author_facet El-Kotob, Rasha
Giangregorio, Lora M.
author_sort El-Kotob, Rasha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of physical activity and rehabilitation interventions can be challenging. Pilot or feasibility studies can be conducted prior to a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT), to improve the chances of conducting a high-quality RCT of a physical activity intervention. MAIN BODY: Physical activity interventions or trials present unique challenges at the population, intervention, comparator and outcome levels. At each level, we present guidance for researchers on the design considerations for pilot or feasibility studies of physical activity interventions. When it comes to defining study population, physical activity trials often exclude participants with certain health conditions or other characteristics (e.g., age, gender) because of uncertainty of the safety of the exercise intervention or presumed differences in responsiveness, at the expense of trial generalizability. A pilot trial could help investigators determine refined inclusion and exclusion criteria to balance safety, adequate recruitment, and generalizability. At the intervention level, because exercise can be a complex intervention, pilot trials allow investigators to evaluate participant adherence and instructor fidelity to the intervention and participant experience. At the comparator level, control group dissatisfaction and post-randomization drop-out can occur, because of the desire to be randomized to the exercise group, and the difficulty with blinding to group allocation; an active control or deception could be used. Finally, at the outcome level, there should be an emphasis on the pilot or feasibility outcomes such as recruitment rate, adherence to exercise, and retention or fidelity, than the efficacy of the exercise intervention. CONCLUSION: Physical activity and rehabilitation researchers can use pilot and feasibility studies to enhance the rigor of future trials, while also publishing the results of their pilot work to move the field forward. Researchers in this field are encouraged to use published reporting guidelines for pilot and feasibility studies and to consider the challenges discussed in this paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6090705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60907052018-08-17 Pilot and feasibility studies in exercise, physical activity, or rehabilitation research El-Kotob, Rasha Giangregorio, Lora M. Pilot Feasibility Stud Commentary BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of physical activity and rehabilitation interventions can be challenging. Pilot or feasibility studies can be conducted prior to a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT), to improve the chances of conducting a high-quality RCT of a physical activity intervention. MAIN BODY: Physical activity interventions or trials present unique challenges at the population, intervention, comparator and outcome levels. At each level, we present guidance for researchers on the design considerations for pilot or feasibility studies of physical activity interventions. When it comes to defining study population, physical activity trials often exclude participants with certain health conditions or other characteristics (e.g., age, gender) because of uncertainty of the safety of the exercise intervention or presumed differences in responsiveness, at the expense of trial generalizability. A pilot trial could help investigators determine refined inclusion and exclusion criteria to balance safety, adequate recruitment, and generalizability. At the intervention level, because exercise can be a complex intervention, pilot trials allow investigators to evaluate participant adherence and instructor fidelity to the intervention and participant experience. At the comparator level, control group dissatisfaction and post-randomization drop-out can occur, because of the desire to be randomized to the exercise group, and the difficulty with blinding to group allocation; an active control or deception could be used. Finally, at the outcome level, there should be an emphasis on the pilot or feasibility outcomes such as recruitment rate, adherence to exercise, and retention or fidelity, than the efficacy of the exercise intervention. CONCLUSION: Physical activity and rehabilitation researchers can use pilot and feasibility studies to enhance the rigor of future trials, while also publishing the results of their pilot work to move the field forward. Researchers in this field are encouraged to use published reporting guidelines for pilot and feasibility studies and to consider the challenges discussed in this paper. BioMed Central 2018-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6090705/ /pubmed/30123527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0326-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
El-Kotob, Rasha
Giangregorio, Lora M.
Pilot and feasibility studies in exercise, physical activity, or rehabilitation research
title Pilot and feasibility studies in exercise, physical activity, or rehabilitation research
title_full Pilot and feasibility studies in exercise, physical activity, or rehabilitation research
title_fullStr Pilot and feasibility studies in exercise, physical activity, or rehabilitation research
title_full_unstemmed Pilot and feasibility studies in exercise, physical activity, or rehabilitation research
title_short Pilot and feasibility studies in exercise, physical activity, or rehabilitation research
title_sort pilot and feasibility studies in exercise, physical activity, or rehabilitation research
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30123527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0326-0
work_keys_str_mv AT elkotobrasha pilotandfeasibilitystudiesinexercisephysicalactivityorrehabilitationresearch
AT giangregorioloram pilotandfeasibilitystudiesinexercisephysicalactivityorrehabilitationresearch