Cargando…

Early treatment versus expectative management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial in Europe (BeNeDuctus trial)

BACKGROUND: Much controversy exists about the optimal management of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants, especially in those born at a gestational age (GA) less than 28 weeks. No causal relationship has been proven between a (haemodynamically significant) PDA and neonatal complicatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hundscheid, Tim, Onland, Wes, van Overmeire, Bart, Dijk, Peter, van Kaam, Anton H. L. C., Dijkman, Koen P., Kooi, Elisabeth M. W., Villamor, Eduardo, Kroon, André A., Visser, Remco, Vijlbrief, Daniel C., de Tollenaer, Susanne M., Cools, Filip, van Laere, David, Johansson, Anne-Britt, Hocq, Catheline, Zecic, Alexandra, Adang, Eddy, Donders, Rogier, de Vries, Willem, van Heijst, Arno F. J., de Boode, Willem P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30077184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1215-7
_version_ 1783347253712257024
author Hundscheid, Tim
Onland, Wes
van Overmeire, Bart
Dijk, Peter
van Kaam, Anton H. L. C.
Dijkman, Koen P.
Kooi, Elisabeth M. W.
Villamor, Eduardo
Kroon, André A.
Visser, Remco
Vijlbrief, Daniel C.
de Tollenaer, Susanne M.
Cools, Filip
van Laere, David
Johansson, Anne-Britt
Hocq, Catheline
Zecic, Alexandra
Adang, Eddy
Donders, Rogier
de Vries, Willem
van Heijst, Arno F. J.
de Boode, Willem P.
author_facet Hundscheid, Tim
Onland, Wes
van Overmeire, Bart
Dijk, Peter
van Kaam, Anton H. L. C.
Dijkman, Koen P.
Kooi, Elisabeth M. W.
Villamor, Eduardo
Kroon, André A.
Visser, Remco
Vijlbrief, Daniel C.
de Tollenaer, Susanne M.
Cools, Filip
van Laere, David
Johansson, Anne-Britt
Hocq, Catheline
Zecic, Alexandra
Adang, Eddy
Donders, Rogier
de Vries, Willem
van Heijst, Arno F. J.
de Boode, Willem P.
author_sort Hundscheid, Tim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Much controversy exists about the optimal management of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants, especially in those born at a gestational age (GA) less than 28 weeks. No causal relationship has been proven between a (haemodynamically significant) PDA and neonatal complications related to pulmonary hyperperfusion and/or systemic hypoperfusion. Although studies show conflicting results, a common understanding is that medical or surgical treatment of a PDA does not seem to reduce the risk of major neonatal morbidities and mortality. As the PDA might have closed spontaneously, treated children are potentially exposed to iatrogenic adverse effects. A conservative approach is gaining interest worldwide, although convincing evidence to support its use is lacking. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial is conducted in neonatal intensive care units. The study population consists of preterm infants (GA < 28 weeks) with an echocardiographic-confirmed PDA with a transductal diameter > 1.5 mm. Early treatment (between 24 and 72 h postnatal age) with the cyclooxygenase inhibitor (COXi) ibuprofen (IBU) is compared with an expectative management (no intervention intended to close a PDA). The primary outcome is the composite of mortality, and/or necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) Bell stage ≥ IIa, and/or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) defined as the need for supplemental oxygen, all at a postmenstrual age (PMA) of 36 weeks. Secondary outcome parameters are short term sequelae of cardiovascular failure, comorbidity and adverse events assessed during hospitalization and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome assessed at a corrected age of 2 years. Consequences regarding health economics are evaluated by cost effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis. DISCUSSION: As a conservative approach is gaining interest, we investigate whether in preterm infants, born at a GA less than 28 weeks, with a PDA an expectative management is non-inferior to early treatment with IBU regarding to the composite outcome of mortality and/or NEC and/or BPD at a PMA of 36 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with the Dutch Trial Register NTR5479 (registered on 19 October 2015), the registry sponsored by the United States National Library of Medicine Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02884219 (registered May 2016) and the European Clinical Trials Database EudraCT 2017–001376-28.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6090763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60907632018-08-17 Early treatment versus expectative management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial in Europe (BeNeDuctus trial) Hundscheid, Tim Onland, Wes van Overmeire, Bart Dijk, Peter van Kaam, Anton H. L. C. Dijkman, Koen P. Kooi, Elisabeth M. W. Villamor, Eduardo Kroon, André A. Visser, Remco Vijlbrief, Daniel C. de Tollenaer, Susanne M. Cools, Filip van Laere, David Johansson, Anne-Britt Hocq, Catheline Zecic, Alexandra Adang, Eddy Donders, Rogier de Vries, Willem van Heijst, Arno F. J. de Boode, Willem P. BMC Pediatr Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Much controversy exists about the optimal management of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants, especially in those born at a gestational age (GA) less than 28 weeks. No causal relationship has been proven between a (haemodynamically significant) PDA and neonatal complications related to pulmonary hyperperfusion and/or systemic hypoperfusion. Although studies show conflicting results, a common understanding is that medical or surgical treatment of a PDA does not seem to reduce the risk of major neonatal morbidities and mortality. As the PDA might have closed spontaneously, treated children are potentially exposed to iatrogenic adverse effects. A conservative approach is gaining interest worldwide, although convincing evidence to support its use is lacking. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial is conducted in neonatal intensive care units. The study population consists of preterm infants (GA < 28 weeks) with an echocardiographic-confirmed PDA with a transductal diameter > 1.5 mm. Early treatment (between 24 and 72 h postnatal age) with the cyclooxygenase inhibitor (COXi) ibuprofen (IBU) is compared with an expectative management (no intervention intended to close a PDA). The primary outcome is the composite of mortality, and/or necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) Bell stage ≥ IIa, and/or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) defined as the need for supplemental oxygen, all at a postmenstrual age (PMA) of 36 weeks. Secondary outcome parameters are short term sequelae of cardiovascular failure, comorbidity and adverse events assessed during hospitalization and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome assessed at a corrected age of 2 years. Consequences regarding health economics are evaluated by cost effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis. DISCUSSION: As a conservative approach is gaining interest, we investigate whether in preterm infants, born at a GA less than 28 weeks, with a PDA an expectative management is non-inferior to early treatment with IBU regarding to the composite outcome of mortality and/or NEC and/or BPD at a PMA of 36 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with the Dutch Trial Register NTR5479 (registered on 19 October 2015), the registry sponsored by the United States National Library of Medicine Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02884219 (registered May 2016) and the European Clinical Trials Database EudraCT 2017–001376-28. BioMed Central 2018-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6090763/ /pubmed/30077184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1215-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Hundscheid, Tim
Onland, Wes
van Overmeire, Bart
Dijk, Peter
van Kaam, Anton H. L. C.
Dijkman, Koen P.
Kooi, Elisabeth M. W.
Villamor, Eduardo
Kroon, André A.
Visser, Remco
Vijlbrief, Daniel C.
de Tollenaer, Susanne M.
Cools, Filip
van Laere, David
Johansson, Anne-Britt
Hocq, Catheline
Zecic, Alexandra
Adang, Eddy
Donders, Rogier
de Vries, Willem
van Heijst, Arno F. J.
de Boode, Willem P.
Early treatment versus expectative management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial in Europe (BeNeDuctus trial)
title Early treatment versus expectative management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial in Europe (BeNeDuctus trial)
title_full Early treatment versus expectative management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial in Europe (BeNeDuctus trial)
title_fullStr Early treatment versus expectative management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial in Europe (BeNeDuctus trial)
title_full_unstemmed Early treatment versus expectative management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial in Europe (BeNeDuctus trial)
title_short Early treatment versus expectative management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial in Europe (BeNeDuctus trial)
title_sort early treatment versus expectative management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial in europe (beneductus trial)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30077184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1215-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hundscheidtim earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT onlandwes earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT vanovermeirebart earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT dijkpeter earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT vankaamantonhlc earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT dijkmankoenp earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT kooielisabethmw earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT villamoreduardo earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT kroonandrea earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT visserremco earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT vijlbriefdanielc earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT detollenaersusannem earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT coolsfilip earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT vanlaeredavid earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT johanssonannebritt earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT hocqcatheline earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT zecicalexandra earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT adangeddy earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT dondersrogier earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT devrieswillem earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT vanheijstarnofj earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial
AT deboodewillemp earlytreatmentversusexpectativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsamulticentrerandomisednoninferioritytrialineuropebeneductustrial