Cargando…

Development, administration, and validity evidence of a subspecialty preparatory test toward licensure: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Trainees in medical subspecialties lack validated assessment scores that can be used to prepare for their licensing examination. This paper presents the development, administration, and validity evidence of a constructed-response preparatory test (CRPT) administered to meet the needs of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, John, Schwartz, Alan, Lineberry, Matthew, Rehman, Faisal, Park, Yoon Soo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30068394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1294-z
_version_ 1783347277359742976
author Johnson, John
Schwartz, Alan
Lineberry, Matthew
Rehman, Faisal
Park, Yoon Soo
author_facet Johnson, John
Schwartz, Alan
Lineberry, Matthew
Rehman, Faisal
Park, Yoon Soo
author_sort Johnson, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Trainees in medical subspecialties lack validated assessment scores that can be used to prepare for their licensing examination. This paper presents the development, administration, and validity evidence of a constructed-response preparatory test (CRPT) administered to meet the needs of nephrology trainees. METHODS: Learning objectives from the licensing examination were used to develop a test blueprint for the preparatory test. Messick’s unified validity framework was used to gather validity evidence for content, response process, internal structure, relations to other variables, and consequences. Questionnaires were used to gather data on the trainees’ perception of examination preparedness, item clarity, and curriculum adequacy. RESULTS: There were 10 trainees and 5 faculty volunteers who took the test. The majority of trainees passed the constructed-response preparatory test. However, many scored poorly on items assessing renal pathology and physiology knowledge. We gathered the following five sources of validity evidence: (1) Content: CRPT mapped to the licensing examination blueprint, with items demonstrating clarity and range of difficulty; (2) Response process: moderate rater agreement (intraclass correlation = .58); (3) Internal structure: sufficient reliability based on generalizability theory (G-coefficient = .76 and Φ-coefficient = .53); (4) Relations to other variables: CRPT scores reflected years of exposure in nephrology and clinical practice; (5) Consequences: post-assessment survey revealed that none of the test takers felt “poorly prepared” for the upcoming summative examination and that their studying would increase in duration and be adapted in terms of content focus. CONCLUSIONS: Preparatory tests using constructed response items mapped to licensure examination blueprint can be developed and used at local program settings to help prepare learners for subspecialty licensure examinations. The CRPT and questionnaire data identified shortcomings of the nephrology training program curriculum. Following the preparatory test, trainees expressed an improved sense of preparedness for their licensing examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6090864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60908642018-08-17 Development, administration, and validity evidence of a subspecialty preparatory test toward licensure: a pilot study Johnson, John Schwartz, Alan Lineberry, Matthew Rehman, Faisal Park, Yoon Soo BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Trainees in medical subspecialties lack validated assessment scores that can be used to prepare for their licensing examination. This paper presents the development, administration, and validity evidence of a constructed-response preparatory test (CRPT) administered to meet the needs of nephrology trainees. METHODS: Learning objectives from the licensing examination were used to develop a test blueprint for the preparatory test. Messick’s unified validity framework was used to gather validity evidence for content, response process, internal structure, relations to other variables, and consequences. Questionnaires were used to gather data on the trainees’ perception of examination preparedness, item clarity, and curriculum adequacy. RESULTS: There were 10 trainees and 5 faculty volunteers who took the test. The majority of trainees passed the constructed-response preparatory test. However, many scored poorly on items assessing renal pathology and physiology knowledge. We gathered the following five sources of validity evidence: (1) Content: CRPT mapped to the licensing examination blueprint, with items demonstrating clarity and range of difficulty; (2) Response process: moderate rater agreement (intraclass correlation = .58); (3) Internal structure: sufficient reliability based on generalizability theory (G-coefficient = .76 and Φ-coefficient = .53); (4) Relations to other variables: CRPT scores reflected years of exposure in nephrology and clinical practice; (5) Consequences: post-assessment survey revealed that none of the test takers felt “poorly prepared” for the upcoming summative examination and that their studying would increase in duration and be adapted in terms of content focus. CONCLUSIONS: Preparatory tests using constructed response items mapped to licensure examination blueprint can be developed and used at local program settings to help prepare learners for subspecialty licensure examinations. The CRPT and questionnaire data identified shortcomings of the nephrology training program curriculum. Following the preparatory test, trainees expressed an improved sense of preparedness for their licensing examination. BioMed Central 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6090864/ /pubmed/30068394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1294-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Johnson, John
Schwartz, Alan
Lineberry, Matthew
Rehman, Faisal
Park, Yoon Soo
Development, administration, and validity evidence of a subspecialty preparatory test toward licensure: a pilot study
title Development, administration, and validity evidence of a subspecialty preparatory test toward licensure: a pilot study
title_full Development, administration, and validity evidence of a subspecialty preparatory test toward licensure: a pilot study
title_fullStr Development, administration, and validity evidence of a subspecialty preparatory test toward licensure: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Development, administration, and validity evidence of a subspecialty preparatory test toward licensure: a pilot study
title_short Development, administration, and validity evidence of a subspecialty preparatory test toward licensure: a pilot study
title_sort development, administration, and validity evidence of a subspecialty preparatory test toward licensure: a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30068394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1294-z
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonjohn developmentadministrationandvalidityevidenceofasubspecialtypreparatorytesttowardlicensureapilotstudy
AT schwartzalan developmentadministrationandvalidityevidenceofasubspecialtypreparatorytesttowardlicensureapilotstudy
AT lineberrymatthew developmentadministrationandvalidityevidenceofasubspecialtypreparatorytesttowardlicensureapilotstudy
AT rehmanfaisal developmentadministrationandvalidityevidenceofasubspecialtypreparatorytesttowardlicensureapilotstudy
AT parkyoonsoo developmentadministrationandvalidityevidenceofasubspecialtypreparatorytesttowardlicensureapilotstudy