Cargando…

What is the impact of sensory practices on the quality of life of long-term care residents? A mixed-methods systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND: With age, the acuity of the five senses (i.e., hearing, sight, taste, smell, touch) is reduced. These types of sensory changes can affect day-to-day activities, making it more difficult for individuals to communicate and to interact with the world around them. The five senses allow us to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Backman, Chantal, Crick, Michelle, Cho-Young, Danielle, Scharf, Megan, Shea, Beverley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30075811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0783-9
_version_ 1783347281070653440
author Backman, Chantal
Crick, Michelle
Cho-Young, Danielle
Scharf, Megan
Shea, Beverley
author_facet Backman, Chantal
Crick, Michelle
Cho-Young, Danielle
Scharf, Megan
Shea, Beverley
author_sort Backman, Chantal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With age, the acuity of the five senses (i.e., hearing, sight, taste, smell, touch) is reduced. These types of sensory changes can affect day-to-day activities, making it more difficult for individuals to communicate and to interact with the world around them. The five senses allow us to receive information from the environment in the form of sound, light, smell, taste, and touch. As an older person’s senses decline, they need more stimulation to be aware of these sensations. In long-term care settings, appropriate sensory practices are needed to address the diminishing senses of older adults. The objective of this mixed-methods systematic review is to examine the relationship between the sensory practices and the quality of life of residents living in long-term care settings and to develop an aggregated synthesis of mixed-methods studies to derive recommendations for policy, practice, and research. METHODS: We will conduct a mixed-methods systematic review in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook. A search strategy has been developed with an expert health sciences librarian and peer reviewed using Peer Review for Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS). Seven databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed (non-MEDLINE—Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Ovid), Ageline, PsycINFO (Ovid), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) will be searched for studies that meet the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers will independently screen the results of the literature search using a two-step process. Eligible studies will undergo a quality assessment and data extraction. Disagreements will be resolved through consultation with a third reviewer. We will assess the quality of individual studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) will be used to summarize the strength of the quantitative evidence, and the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) tool to assess confidence in the qualitative syntheses. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will summarize evidence-based knowledge for sensory practices, identify gaps in the literature, and inform an audit program for assessing the presence of sensory practices in the long-term care setting. The results will be relevant to policy makers, decision-makers, clinicians, and residents/families in long-term care settings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration # CRD42017032330. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-018-0783-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6090882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60908822018-08-17 What is the impact of sensory practices on the quality of life of long-term care residents? A mixed-methods systematic review protocol Backman, Chantal Crick, Michelle Cho-Young, Danielle Scharf, Megan Shea, Beverley Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: With age, the acuity of the five senses (i.e., hearing, sight, taste, smell, touch) is reduced. These types of sensory changes can affect day-to-day activities, making it more difficult for individuals to communicate and to interact with the world around them. The five senses allow us to receive information from the environment in the form of sound, light, smell, taste, and touch. As an older person’s senses decline, they need more stimulation to be aware of these sensations. In long-term care settings, appropriate sensory practices are needed to address the diminishing senses of older adults. The objective of this mixed-methods systematic review is to examine the relationship between the sensory practices and the quality of life of residents living in long-term care settings and to develop an aggregated synthesis of mixed-methods studies to derive recommendations for policy, practice, and research. METHODS: We will conduct a mixed-methods systematic review in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook. A search strategy has been developed with an expert health sciences librarian and peer reviewed using Peer Review for Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS). Seven databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed (non-MEDLINE—Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Ovid), Ageline, PsycINFO (Ovid), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) will be searched for studies that meet the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers will independently screen the results of the literature search using a two-step process. Eligible studies will undergo a quality assessment and data extraction. Disagreements will be resolved through consultation with a third reviewer. We will assess the quality of individual studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) will be used to summarize the strength of the quantitative evidence, and the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) tool to assess confidence in the qualitative syntheses. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will summarize evidence-based knowledge for sensory practices, identify gaps in the literature, and inform an audit program for assessing the presence of sensory practices in the long-term care setting. The results will be relevant to policy makers, decision-makers, clinicians, and residents/families in long-term care settings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration # CRD42017032330. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-018-0783-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6090882/ /pubmed/30075811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0783-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Backman, Chantal
Crick, Michelle
Cho-Young, Danielle
Scharf, Megan
Shea, Beverley
What is the impact of sensory practices on the quality of life of long-term care residents? A mixed-methods systematic review protocol
title What is the impact of sensory practices on the quality of life of long-term care residents? A mixed-methods systematic review protocol
title_full What is the impact of sensory practices on the quality of life of long-term care residents? A mixed-methods systematic review protocol
title_fullStr What is the impact of sensory practices on the quality of life of long-term care residents? A mixed-methods systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed What is the impact of sensory practices on the quality of life of long-term care residents? A mixed-methods systematic review protocol
title_short What is the impact of sensory practices on the quality of life of long-term care residents? A mixed-methods systematic review protocol
title_sort what is the impact of sensory practices on the quality of life of long-term care residents? a mixed-methods systematic review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30075811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0783-9
work_keys_str_mv AT backmanchantal whatistheimpactofsensorypracticesonthequalityoflifeoflongtermcareresidentsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol
AT crickmichelle whatistheimpactofsensorypracticesonthequalityoflifeoflongtermcareresidentsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol
AT choyoungdanielle whatistheimpactofsensorypracticesonthequalityoflifeoflongtermcareresidentsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol
AT scharfmegan whatistheimpactofsensorypracticesonthequalityoflifeoflongtermcareresidentsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol
AT sheabeverley whatistheimpactofsensorypracticesonthequalityoflifeoflongtermcareresidentsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol