Cargando…

A multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and design

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) and frailty often co-exist, and frailty in HF results in a poor prognosis. However, in Asian populations, prognostic criteria are needed to examine the effect of frailty on HF. Therefore, we conducted a nationwide cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamada, Sumio, Adachi, Takuji, Izawa, Hideo, Murohara, Toyoaki, Kondo, Takaaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30071828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0897-y
_version_ 1783347291265957888
author Yamada, Sumio
Adachi, Takuji
Izawa, Hideo
Murohara, Toyoaki
Kondo, Takaaki
author_facet Yamada, Sumio
Adachi, Takuji
Izawa, Hideo
Murohara, Toyoaki
Kondo, Takaaki
author_sort Yamada, Sumio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) and frailty often co-exist, and frailty in HF results in a poor prognosis. However, in Asian populations, prognostic criteria are needed to examine the effect of frailty on HF. Therefore, we conducted a nationwide cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in HF patients (FLAGSHIP). FLAGSHIP mainly aims to 1) develop the frailty criteria based on HF-specific outcomes, 2) propose a hypothesis of the potential mechanisms of frailty manifestations in HF, and 3) examine the effects of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation on frailty. METHODS: In this prospective study, we consecutively enroll ambulatory patients admitted because of acute HF or exacerbation of HF and elderly patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (age ≥ 70 years). They will be followed up for 2 years to assess frailty and hard clinical events. The primary endpoints of FLAGSHIP are cardiac events including cardiac mortality and HF-related readmission after discharge. Secondary endpoints are readmissions because of fracture or pneumonia and all-cause mortality. We used clinical data, including the items related to the frailty phenotype to develop diagnostic criteria for frailty and known prognostic factors of HF. Cognitive function, depression, and anorexia are also considered as potential components of frailty. As of March 2018, 2650 patients (85% was patients admitted for HF) have been registered from 30 collaborating hospitals nationwide in Japan. DISCUSSION: FLAGSHIP provides diagnostic criteria and fundamental information on frailty manifestations to develop the best practices for the long-term management of HF. Diagnostic criteria on frailty developed by FLAGSHIP is expected to become a novel indicator for the stratification of patients at risk to functional decline after medical or surgical treatment, and in turn to contribute to the best practices in the long-term management of HF. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-018-0897-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6090927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60909272018-08-17 A multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and design Yamada, Sumio Adachi, Takuji Izawa, Hideo Murohara, Toyoaki Kondo, Takaaki BMC Cardiovasc Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) and frailty often co-exist, and frailty in HF results in a poor prognosis. However, in Asian populations, prognostic criteria are needed to examine the effect of frailty on HF. Therefore, we conducted a nationwide cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in HF patients (FLAGSHIP). FLAGSHIP mainly aims to 1) develop the frailty criteria based on HF-specific outcomes, 2) propose a hypothesis of the potential mechanisms of frailty manifestations in HF, and 3) examine the effects of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation on frailty. METHODS: In this prospective study, we consecutively enroll ambulatory patients admitted because of acute HF or exacerbation of HF and elderly patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (age ≥ 70 years). They will be followed up for 2 years to assess frailty and hard clinical events. The primary endpoints of FLAGSHIP are cardiac events including cardiac mortality and HF-related readmission after discharge. Secondary endpoints are readmissions because of fracture or pneumonia and all-cause mortality. We used clinical data, including the items related to the frailty phenotype to develop diagnostic criteria for frailty and known prognostic factors of HF. Cognitive function, depression, and anorexia are also considered as potential components of frailty. As of March 2018, 2650 patients (85% was patients admitted for HF) have been registered from 30 collaborating hospitals nationwide in Japan. DISCUSSION: FLAGSHIP provides diagnostic criteria and fundamental information on frailty manifestations to develop the best practices for the long-term management of HF. Diagnostic criteria on frailty developed by FLAGSHIP is expected to become a novel indicator for the stratification of patients at risk to functional decline after medical or surgical treatment, and in turn to contribute to the best practices in the long-term management of HF. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-018-0897-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6090927/ /pubmed/30071828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0897-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Yamada, Sumio
Adachi, Takuji
Izawa, Hideo
Murohara, Toyoaki
Kondo, Takaaki
A multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and design
title A multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and design
title_full A multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and design
title_fullStr A multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and design
title_full_unstemmed A multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and design
title_short A multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (FLAGSHIP): rationale and design
title_sort multicenter prospective cohort study to develop frailty-based prognostic criteria in heart failure patients (flagship): rationale and design
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30071828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0897-y
work_keys_str_mv AT yamadasumio amulticenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT adachitakuji amulticenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT izawahideo amulticenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT muroharatoyoaki amulticenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT kondotakaaki amulticenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT amulticenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT yamadasumio multicenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT adachitakuji multicenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT izawahideo multicenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT muroharatoyoaki multicenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT kondotakaaki multicenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign
AT multicenterprospectivecohortstudytodevelopfrailtybasedprognosticcriteriainheartfailurepatientsflagshiprationaleanddesign