Cargando…
Denosumab compared to bisphosphonates to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for osteoporosis was controversial. Denosumab and bisphosphonates were two most common drugs. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab with bisphosphonates to treat osteoporosis. METHODS: Published literatures, only including ra...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30071889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0865-3 |
_version_ | 1783347294370791424 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Jiaqi Zhang, Qingsheng Yan, Guanghui Jin, Xianhui |
author_facet | Wu, Jiaqi Zhang, Qingsheng Yan, Guanghui Jin, Xianhui |
author_sort | Wu, Jiaqi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for osteoporosis was controversial. Denosumab and bisphosphonates were two most common drugs. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab with bisphosphonates to treat osteoporosis. METHODS: Published literatures, only including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were searched in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google database from inception to April 20 2018. Studies that compared denosumab with bisphosphonates to treat osteoporosis were included. Random-effect model was used for meta-analysis due to the unavoidable clinical heterogeneity. We used the risk of fracture as the primary outcome. Stata 12.0 was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eleven studies involving 5446 patients (denosumab = 2873, bisphosphonates = 2573) were included in the present meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between the risk of fracture (risk ratio (RR), 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82–1.55; P = 0.466), adverse events (AEs) (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.96–1.04; P = 0.957) and withdrawn due to AEs (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.34–137; P = 0.280). Denosumab compared with bisphosphonates significantly increased change in total hip, femoral neck, lumbar spine, and one-third radius bone mineral density (BMD) for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggested that denosumab but not bisphosphonates significantly increased change in total hip, femoral neck, lumbar spine, and one-third radius BMD for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients. Current evidence suggested no benefit of denosumab for reducing risk of fracture than bisphosphonates. More long-term follow-up RCTs are needed to identify the potential complications of denosumab. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13018-018-0865-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6090940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60909402018-08-17 Denosumab compared to bisphosphonates to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis Wu, Jiaqi Zhang, Qingsheng Yan, Guanghui Jin, Xianhui J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for osteoporosis was controversial. Denosumab and bisphosphonates were two most common drugs. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab with bisphosphonates to treat osteoporosis. METHODS: Published literatures, only including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were searched in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google database from inception to April 20 2018. Studies that compared denosumab with bisphosphonates to treat osteoporosis were included. Random-effect model was used for meta-analysis due to the unavoidable clinical heterogeneity. We used the risk of fracture as the primary outcome. Stata 12.0 was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eleven studies involving 5446 patients (denosumab = 2873, bisphosphonates = 2573) were included in the present meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between the risk of fracture (risk ratio (RR), 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82–1.55; P = 0.466), adverse events (AEs) (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.96–1.04; P = 0.957) and withdrawn due to AEs (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.34–137; P = 0.280). Denosumab compared with bisphosphonates significantly increased change in total hip, femoral neck, lumbar spine, and one-third radius bone mineral density (BMD) for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggested that denosumab but not bisphosphonates significantly increased change in total hip, femoral neck, lumbar spine, and one-third radius BMD for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients. Current evidence suggested no benefit of denosumab for reducing risk of fracture than bisphosphonates. More long-term follow-up RCTs are needed to identify the potential complications of denosumab. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13018-018-0865-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6090940/ /pubmed/30071889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0865-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wu, Jiaqi Zhang, Qingsheng Yan, Guanghui Jin, Xianhui Denosumab compared to bisphosphonates to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis |
title | Denosumab compared to bisphosphonates to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Denosumab compared to bisphosphonates to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Denosumab compared to bisphosphonates to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Denosumab compared to bisphosphonates to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Denosumab compared to bisphosphonates to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | denosumab compared to bisphosphonates to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30071889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0865-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wujiaqi denosumabcomparedtobisphosphonatestotreatpostmenopausalosteoporosisametaanalysis AT zhangqingsheng denosumabcomparedtobisphosphonatestotreatpostmenopausalosteoporosisametaanalysis AT yanguanghui denosumabcomparedtobisphosphonatestotreatpostmenopausalosteoporosisametaanalysis AT jinxianhui denosumabcomparedtobisphosphonatestotreatpostmenopausalosteoporosisametaanalysis |