Cargando…

The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI

BACKGROUND: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive imaging method for breast cancer detection and is therefore offered as a screening technique to women at increased risk of developing breast cancer. However, mammography is currently added from the age of 30 without proven ben...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vreemann, Suzan, van Zelst, Jan C. M., Schlooz-Vries, Margrethe, Bult, Peter, Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline, Karssemeijer, Nico, Gubern-Mérida, Albert, Mann, Ritse M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6091096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30075794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-1019-6
_version_ 1783347331216703488
author Vreemann, Suzan
van Zelst, Jan C. M.
Schlooz-Vries, Margrethe
Bult, Peter
Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline
Karssemeijer, Nico
Gubern-Mérida, Albert
Mann, Ritse M.
author_facet Vreemann, Suzan
van Zelst, Jan C. M.
Schlooz-Vries, Margrethe
Bult, Peter
Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline
Karssemeijer, Nico
Gubern-Mérida, Albert
Mann, Ritse M.
author_sort Vreemann, Suzan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive imaging method for breast cancer detection and is therefore offered as a screening technique to women at increased risk of developing breast cancer. However, mammography is currently added from the age of 30 without proven benefits. The purpose of this study is to investigate the added cancer detection of mammography when breast MRI is available, focusing on the value in women with and without BRCA mutation, and in the age groups above and below 50 years. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study evaluated 6553 screening rounds in 2026 women at increased risk of breast cancer (1 January 2003 to 1 January 2014). Risk category (BRCA mutation versus others at increased risk of breast cancer), age at examination, recall, biopsy, and histopathological diagnosis were recorded. Cancer yield, false positive recall rate (FPR), and false positive biopsy rate (FPB) were calculated using generalized estimating equations for separate age categories (< 40, 40–50, 50–60, ≥ 60 years). Numbers of screens needed to detect an additional breast cancer with mammography (NSN) were calculated for the subgroups. RESULTS: Of a total of 125 screen-detected breast cancers, 112 were detected by MRI and 66 by mammography: 13 cancers were solely detected by mammography, including 8 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ. In BRCA mutation carriers, 3 of 61 cancers were detected only on mammography, while in other women 10 of 64 cases were detected with mammography alone. While 77% of mammography-detected-only cancers were detected in women ≥ 50 years of age, mammography also added more to the FPR in these women. Below 50 years the number of mammographic examinations needed to find an MRI-occult cancer was 1427. CONCLUSIONS: Mammography is of limited added value in terms of cancer detection when breast MRI is available for women of all ages who are at increased risk. While the benefit appears slightly larger in women over 50 years of age without BRCA mutation, there is also a substantial increase in false positive findings in these women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6091096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60910962018-08-20 The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI Vreemann, Suzan van Zelst, Jan C. M. Schlooz-Vries, Margrethe Bult, Peter Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline Karssemeijer, Nico Gubern-Mérida, Albert Mann, Ritse M. Breast Cancer Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive imaging method for breast cancer detection and is therefore offered as a screening technique to women at increased risk of developing breast cancer. However, mammography is currently added from the age of 30 without proven benefits. The purpose of this study is to investigate the added cancer detection of mammography when breast MRI is available, focusing on the value in women with and without BRCA mutation, and in the age groups above and below 50 years. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study evaluated 6553 screening rounds in 2026 women at increased risk of breast cancer (1 January 2003 to 1 January 2014). Risk category (BRCA mutation versus others at increased risk of breast cancer), age at examination, recall, biopsy, and histopathological diagnosis were recorded. Cancer yield, false positive recall rate (FPR), and false positive biopsy rate (FPB) were calculated using generalized estimating equations for separate age categories (< 40, 40–50, 50–60, ≥ 60 years). Numbers of screens needed to detect an additional breast cancer with mammography (NSN) were calculated for the subgroups. RESULTS: Of a total of 125 screen-detected breast cancers, 112 were detected by MRI and 66 by mammography: 13 cancers were solely detected by mammography, including 8 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ. In BRCA mutation carriers, 3 of 61 cancers were detected only on mammography, while in other women 10 of 64 cases were detected with mammography alone. While 77% of mammography-detected-only cancers were detected in women ≥ 50 years of age, mammography also added more to the FPR in these women. Below 50 years the number of mammographic examinations needed to find an MRI-occult cancer was 1427. CONCLUSIONS: Mammography is of limited added value in terms of cancer detection when breast MRI is available for women of all ages who are at increased risk. While the benefit appears slightly larger in women over 50 years of age without BRCA mutation, there is also a substantial increase in false positive findings in these women. BioMed Central 2018-08-03 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6091096/ /pubmed/30075794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-1019-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vreemann, Suzan
van Zelst, Jan C. M.
Schlooz-Vries, Margrethe
Bult, Peter
Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline
Karssemeijer, Nico
Gubern-Mérida, Albert
Mann, Ritse M.
The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI
title The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI
title_full The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI
title_fullStr The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI
title_full_unstemmed The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI
title_short The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI
title_sort added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without brca mutation screened with breast mri
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6091096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30075794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-1019-6
work_keys_str_mv AT vreemannsuzan theaddedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri
AT vanzelstjancm theaddedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri
AT schloozvriesmargrethe theaddedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri
AT bultpeter theaddedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri
AT hoogerbruggenicoline theaddedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri
AT karssemeijernico theaddedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri
AT gubernmeridaalbert theaddedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri
AT mannritsem theaddedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri
AT vreemannsuzan addedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri
AT vanzelstjancm addedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri
AT schloozvriesmargrethe addedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri
AT bultpeter addedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri
AT hoogerbruggenicoline addedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri
AT karssemeijernico addedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri
AT gubernmeridaalbert addedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri
AT mannritsem addedvalueofmammographyindifferentagegroupsofwomenwithandwithoutbrcamutationscreenedwithbreastmri