Cargando…

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of aorto-iliac and ilio-femoral vascular calcifications using proton density-weighted in-phase stack of stars

BACKGROUND: Comparing cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) angiography with computed tomography angiography (CTA), a major deficiency has been its inability to reliably image peripheral vascular calcifications that may impact the choice of interventional strategy and influence patient prognosis....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serhal, Ali, Koktzoglou, Ioannis, Aouad, Pascale, Carr, James C., Giri, Shivraman, Morcos, Omar, Edelman, Robert R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6091148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30078377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0479-2
_version_ 1783347339200561152
author Serhal, Ali
Koktzoglou, Ioannis
Aouad, Pascale
Carr, James C.
Giri, Shivraman
Morcos, Omar
Edelman, Robert R.
author_facet Serhal, Ali
Koktzoglou, Ioannis
Aouad, Pascale
Carr, James C.
Giri, Shivraman
Morcos, Omar
Edelman, Robert R.
author_sort Serhal, Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Comparing cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) angiography with computed tomography angiography (CTA), a major deficiency has been its inability to reliably image peripheral vascular calcifications that may impact the choice of interventional strategy and influence patient prognosis. Recently, MRI using a proton density-weighted, in-phase stack of stars (PDIP-SOS) technique has proved capable of detecting these calcifications. The goal of the present study was two-fold: (1) to determine whether magnetic field strength impacts the apparent size and conspicuity of ilio-femoral arterial calcifications; and (2) to determine whether the technique can be accurately applied to image aorto-iliac arterial calcifications. MAIN BODY: Two patient cohorts were studied. For the first cohort, ilio-femoral arterial calcifications were imaged at 1.5 Tesla in 20 patients and at 3 Tesla in 12 patients. For the second cohort, aorto-iliac arterial calcifications were imaged in 10 patients at 3 Tesla and one patient at 1.5 Tesla. Qualitative image analysis as well as quantitative analysis using a semi-automated technique were performed using CTA as the reference standard. Qualitatively, most PDIP-SOS CMR images showed good-to-excellent confidence to detect vascular calcifications, with good-to-excellent inter-reader agreement (κ = 0.67 for ilio-femoral region, P < 0.001; κ = 0.80 for aorto-iliac region, P < 0.01). There was an overall excellent correlation (r = 0.98, P < 0.001) and agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.97, P < 0.001) between PDIP-SOS CMR and CTA measures of calcification volume in both regions, with no overt difference in performance at 1.5 Tesla vs. 3 Tesla for ilio-femoral calcifications. CMR lesion volumes were slightly lower than those measured for CTA. CONCLUSION: Using PDIP-SOS CMR, aorto-iliac and ilio-femoral calcifications could be simultaneously evaluated at 3 Tesla in less than six minutes with excellent correlation and agreement to CTA. Our results suggest that PDIP-SOS CMR provides a reliable alternative to CT for pre-interventional evaluation of peripheral vascular calcium burden.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6091148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60911482018-08-20 Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of aorto-iliac and ilio-femoral vascular calcifications using proton density-weighted in-phase stack of stars Serhal, Ali Koktzoglou, Ioannis Aouad, Pascale Carr, James C. Giri, Shivraman Morcos, Omar Edelman, Robert R. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Technical Notes BACKGROUND: Comparing cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) angiography with computed tomography angiography (CTA), a major deficiency has been its inability to reliably image peripheral vascular calcifications that may impact the choice of interventional strategy and influence patient prognosis. Recently, MRI using a proton density-weighted, in-phase stack of stars (PDIP-SOS) technique has proved capable of detecting these calcifications. The goal of the present study was two-fold: (1) to determine whether magnetic field strength impacts the apparent size and conspicuity of ilio-femoral arterial calcifications; and (2) to determine whether the technique can be accurately applied to image aorto-iliac arterial calcifications. MAIN BODY: Two patient cohorts were studied. For the first cohort, ilio-femoral arterial calcifications were imaged at 1.5 Tesla in 20 patients and at 3 Tesla in 12 patients. For the second cohort, aorto-iliac arterial calcifications were imaged in 10 patients at 3 Tesla and one patient at 1.5 Tesla. Qualitative image analysis as well as quantitative analysis using a semi-automated technique were performed using CTA as the reference standard. Qualitatively, most PDIP-SOS CMR images showed good-to-excellent confidence to detect vascular calcifications, with good-to-excellent inter-reader agreement (κ = 0.67 for ilio-femoral region, P < 0.001; κ = 0.80 for aorto-iliac region, P < 0.01). There was an overall excellent correlation (r = 0.98, P < 0.001) and agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.97, P < 0.001) between PDIP-SOS CMR and CTA measures of calcification volume in both regions, with no overt difference in performance at 1.5 Tesla vs. 3 Tesla for ilio-femoral calcifications. CMR lesion volumes were slightly lower than those measured for CTA. CONCLUSION: Using PDIP-SOS CMR, aorto-iliac and ilio-femoral calcifications could be simultaneously evaluated at 3 Tesla in less than six minutes with excellent correlation and agreement to CTA. Our results suggest that PDIP-SOS CMR provides a reliable alternative to CT for pre-interventional evaluation of peripheral vascular calcium burden. BioMed Central 2018-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6091148/ /pubmed/30078377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0479-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Serhal, Ali
Koktzoglou, Ioannis
Aouad, Pascale
Carr, James C.
Giri, Shivraman
Morcos, Omar
Edelman, Robert R.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of aorto-iliac and ilio-femoral vascular calcifications using proton density-weighted in-phase stack of stars
title Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of aorto-iliac and ilio-femoral vascular calcifications using proton density-weighted in-phase stack of stars
title_full Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of aorto-iliac and ilio-femoral vascular calcifications using proton density-weighted in-phase stack of stars
title_fullStr Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of aorto-iliac and ilio-femoral vascular calcifications using proton density-weighted in-phase stack of stars
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of aorto-iliac and ilio-femoral vascular calcifications using proton density-weighted in-phase stack of stars
title_short Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of aorto-iliac and ilio-femoral vascular calcifications using proton density-weighted in-phase stack of stars
title_sort cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of aorto-iliac and ilio-femoral vascular calcifications using proton density-weighted in-phase stack of stars
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6091148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30078377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0479-2
work_keys_str_mv AT serhalali cardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingofaortoiliacandiliofemoralvascularcalcificationsusingprotondensityweightedinphasestackofstars
AT koktzoglouioannis cardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingofaortoiliacandiliofemoralvascularcalcificationsusingprotondensityweightedinphasestackofstars
AT aouadpascale cardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingofaortoiliacandiliofemoralvascularcalcificationsusingprotondensityweightedinphasestackofstars
AT carrjamesc cardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingofaortoiliacandiliofemoralvascularcalcificationsusingprotondensityweightedinphasestackofstars
AT girishivraman cardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingofaortoiliacandiliofemoralvascularcalcificationsusingprotondensityweightedinphasestackofstars
AT morcosomar cardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingofaortoiliacandiliofemoralvascularcalcificationsusingprotondensityweightedinphasestackofstars
AT edelmanrobertr cardiovascularmagneticresonanceimagingofaortoiliacandiliofemoralvascularcalcificationsusingprotondensityweightedinphasestackofstars