Cargando…

Finite Element Analysis of Different Double-Plate Angles in the Treatment of the Femoral Shaft Nonunion with No Cortical Support opposite the Primary Lateral Plate

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the biomechanical outcome of different plate fixation strategies (the single plate construct, 45° double-plate construct, 90° double-plate construct, 135° double-plate construct, and 180° double-plate construct) used for the fixation of the femoral shaft nonunion with no cor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Hao, Li, Jiantao, Zhou, Jianfeng, Li, Lianting, Hao, Ming, Wang, Kun, Xu, Gaoxiang, Li, Chen, Zhang, Wei, Tang, Peifu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6091371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3267107
_version_ 1783347375954198528
author Zhang, Hao
Li, Jiantao
Zhou, Jianfeng
Li, Lianting
Hao, Ming
Wang, Kun
Xu, Gaoxiang
Li, Chen
Zhang, Wei
Tang, Peifu
author_facet Zhang, Hao
Li, Jiantao
Zhou, Jianfeng
Li, Lianting
Hao, Ming
Wang, Kun
Xu, Gaoxiang
Li, Chen
Zhang, Wei
Tang, Peifu
author_sort Zhang, Hao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the biomechanical outcome of different plate fixation strategies (the single plate construct, 45° double-plate construct, 90° double-plate construct, 135° double-plate construct, and 180° double-plate construct) used for the fixation of the femoral shaft nonunion with no cortical support opposite the primary lateral plate. This may help surgeons choose the optimal therapy to the femoral shaft nonunion. METHODS: The femoral shaft nonunion with no medial support and the models of lateral plate and medial plate was constructed in 3-matic software and UG-NX software, respectively. We then assembled the single plate and different double plates to the fracture model separately to form the fixation models. After meshing the models' elements, we used the ABAQUS software to perform the finite element analysis. Values of the von Mises Stress (VMS) distribution of the implant, peak VMS, and model displacement and deformation were used to capture the mechanical factors in this study. RESULTS: Our results indicated that the peak von Mises Stress (VMS) of the lateral plate was concentrated in middle surface of the lateral plate near the fragment of each group. The peak VMS was 5201.0 MPa (the single-plate construct), 3490.0 MPa (45° double-plate construct), 1754.0 MPa (90° double-plate construct), 1123.0 MPa (135° double-plate construct), and 816.5 MPa (180° double-plate construct). The additional short plate dispersed some stress leading to the decrease in the peak VMS of the lateral plate. As angle formed by the double plates increased, the dispersed function of the additional plate was becoming obvious. The bending angles of the lateral plate were 18° versus 12° versus 3° versus 2° versus 1° (the single-plate construct versus 45° double-plate construct versus 90° double-plate construct versus 135° double-plate construct versus 180° double-plate construct). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that increasing the angle between the plates in a double-plate construct improves the stability of the construct over a single lateral plate when there is no cortical support opposite to the lateral plate. The strongest fixation occurred when the angle between the two plates was greater than ninety degrees.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6091371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60913712018-08-27 Finite Element Analysis of Different Double-Plate Angles in the Treatment of the Femoral Shaft Nonunion with No Cortical Support opposite the Primary Lateral Plate Zhang, Hao Li, Jiantao Zhou, Jianfeng Li, Lianting Hao, Ming Wang, Kun Xu, Gaoxiang Li, Chen Zhang, Wei Tang, Peifu Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the biomechanical outcome of different plate fixation strategies (the single plate construct, 45° double-plate construct, 90° double-plate construct, 135° double-plate construct, and 180° double-plate construct) used for the fixation of the femoral shaft nonunion with no cortical support opposite the primary lateral plate. This may help surgeons choose the optimal therapy to the femoral shaft nonunion. METHODS: The femoral shaft nonunion with no medial support and the models of lateral plate and medial plate was constructed in 3-matic software and UG-NX software, respectively. We then assembled the single plate and different double plates to the fracture model separately to form the fixation models. After meshing the models' elements, we used the ABAQUS software to perform the finite element analysis. Values of the von Mises Stress (VMS) distribution of the implant, peak VMS, and model displacement and deformation were used to capture the mechanical factors in this study. RESULTS: Our results indicated that the peak von Mises Stress (VMS) of the lateral plate was concentrated in middle surface of the lateral plate near the fragment of each group. The peak VMS was 5201.0 MPa (the single-plate construct), 3490.0 MPa (45° double-plate construct), 1754.0 MPa (90° double-plate construct), 1123.0 MPa (135° double-plate construct), and 816.5 MPa (180° double-plate construct). The additional short plate dispersed some stress leading to the decrease in the peak VMS of the lateral plate. As angle formed by the double plates increased, the dispersed function of the additional plate was becoming obvious. The bending angles of the lateral plate were 18° versus 12° versus 3° versus 2° versus 1° (the single-plate construct versus 45° double-plate construct versus 90° double-plate construct versus 135° double-plate construct versus 180° double-plate construct). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that increasing the angle between the plates in a double-plate construct improves the stability of the construct over a single lateral plate when there is no cortical support opposite to the lateral plate. The strongest fixation occurred when the angle between the two plates was greater than ninety degrees. Hindawi 2018-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6091371/ /pubmed/30151378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3267107 Text en Copyright © 2018 Hao Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Hao
Li, Jiantao
Zhou, Jianfeng
Li, Lianting
Hao, Ming
Wang, Kun
Xu, Gaoxiang
Li, Chen
Zhang, Wei
Tang, Peifu
Finite Element Analysis of Different Double-Plate Angles in the Treatment of the Femoral Shaft Nonunion with No Cortical Support opposite the Primary Lateral Plate
title Finite Element Analysis of Different Double-Plate Angles in the Treatment of the Femoral Shaft Nonunion with No Cortical Support opposite the Primary Lateral Plate
title_full Finite Element Analysis of Different Double-Plate Angles in the Treatment of the Femoral Shaft Nonunion with No Cortical Support opposite the Primary Lateral Plate
title_fullStr Finite Element Analysis of Different Double-Plate Angles in the Treatment of the Femoral Shaft Nonunion with No Cortical Support opposite the Primary Lateral Plate
title_full_unstemmed Finite Element Analysis of Different Double-Plate Angles in the Treatment of the Femoral Shaft Nonunion with No Cortical Support opposite the Primary Lateral Plate
title_short Finite Element Analysis of Different Double-Plate Angles in the Treatment of the Femoral Shaft Nonunion with No Cortical Support opposite the Primary Lateral Plate
title_sort finite element analysis of different double-plate angles in the treatment of the femoral shaft nonunion with no cortical support opposite the primary lateral plate
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6091371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3267107
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghao finiteelementanalysisofdifferentdoubleplateanglesinthetreatmentofthefemoralshaftnonunionwithnocorticalsupportoppositetheprimarylateralplate
AT lijiantao finiteelementanalysisofdifferentdoubleplateanglesinthetreatmentofthefemoralshaftnonunionwithnocorticalsupportoppositetheprimarylateralplate
AT zhoujianfeng finiteelementanalysisofdifferentdoubleplateanglesinthetreatmentofthefemoralshaftnonunionwithnocorticalsupportoppositetheprimarylateralplate
AT lilianting finiteelementanalysisofdifferentdoubleplateanglesinthetreatmentofthefemoralshaftnonunionwithnocorticalsupportoppositetheprimarylateralplate
AT haoming finiteelementanalysisofdifferentdoubleplateanglesinthetreatmentofthefemoralshaftnonunionwithnocorticalsupportoppositetheprimarylateralplate
AT wangkun finiteelementanalysisofdifferentdoubleplateanglesinthetreatmentofthefemoralshaftnonunionwithnocorticalsupportoppositetheprimarylateralplate
AT xugaoxiang finiteelementanalysisofdifferentdoubleplateanglesinthetreatmentofthefemoralshaftnonunionwithnocorticalsupportoppositetheprimarylateralplate
AT lichen finiteelementanalysisofdifferentdoubleplateanglesinthetreatmentofthefemoralshaftnonunionwithnocorticalsupportoppositetheprimarylateralplate
AT zhangwei finiteelementanalysisofdifferentdoubleplateanglesinthetreatmentofthefemoralshaftnonunionwithnocorticalsupportoppositetheprimarylateralplate
AT tangpeifu finiteelementanalysisofdifferentdoubleplateanglesinthetreatmentofthefemoralshaftnonunionwithnocorticalsupportoppositetheprimarylateralplate