Cargando…

Students’ views on the block evaluation process: A descriptive analysis

BACKGROUND: Higher education institutions have executed policies and practices intended to determine and promote good teaching. Students’ evaluation of the teaching and learning process is seen as one measure of evaluating quality and effectiveness of instruction and courses. Policies and procedures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pakkies, Ntefeleng E., Mtshali, Ntombifikile G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6091753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27246790
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v39i1.1516
_version_ 1783347421693083648
author Pakkies, Ntefeleng E.
Mtshali, Ntombifikile G.
author_facet Pakkies, Ntefeleng E.
Mtshali, Ntombifikile G.
author_sort Pakkies, Ntefeleng E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Higher education institutions have executed policies and practices intended to determine and promote good teaching. Students’ evaluation of the teaching and learning process is seen as one measure of evaluating quality and effectiveness of instruction and courses. Policies and procedures guiding this process are discernible in universities, but it is often not the case for nursing colleges. OBJECTIVE: To analyse and describe the views of nursing students on block evaluation, and how feedback obtained from this process was managed. METHOD: A quantitative descriptive study was conducted amongst nursing students (n = 177) in their second to fourth year of training from one nursing college in KwaZulu-Natal. A questionnaire was administered by the researcher and data were analysed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences Version 19.0. RESULTS: The response rate was 145 (81.9%). The participants perceived the aim of block evaluation as improving the quality of teaching and enhancing their experiences as students. They questioned the significance of their input as stakeholders given that they had never been consulted about the development or review of the evaluation tool, or the administration process; and they often did not receive feedback from the evaluation they participated in. CONCLUSION: The college management should develop a clear organisational structure with supporting policies and operational guidelines for administering the evaluation process. The administration, implementation procedures, reporting of results and follow-up mechanisms should be made transparent and communicated to all concerned. Reports and actions related to these evaluations should provide feedback into relevant courses or programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6091753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60917532018-08-22 Students’ views on the block evaluation process: A descriptive analysis Pakkies, Ntefeleng E. Mtshali, Ntombifikile G. Curationis Original Research BACKGROUND: Higher education institutions have executed policies and practices intended to determine and promote good teaching. Students’ evaluation of the teaching and learning process is seen as one measure of evaluating quality and effectiveness of instruction and courses. Policies and procedures guiding this process are discernible in universities, but it is often not the case for nursing colleges. OBJECTIVE: To analyse and describe the views of nursing students on block evaluation, and how feedback obtained from this process was managed. METHOD: A quantitative descriptive study was conducted amongst nursing students (n = 177) in their second to fourth year of training from one nursing college in KwaZulu-Natal. A questionnaire was administered by the researcher and data were analysed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences Version 19.0. RESULTS: The response rate was 145 (81.9%). The participants perceived the aim of block evaluation as improving the quality of teaching and enhancing their experiences as students. They questioned the significance of their input as stakeholders given that they had never been consulted about the development or review of the evaluation tool, or the administration process; and they often did not receive feedback from the evaluation they participated in. CONCLUSION: The college management should develop a clear organisational structure with supporting policies and operational guidelines for administering the evaluation process. The administration, implementation procedures, reporting of results and follow-up mechanisms should be made transparent and communicated to all concerned. Reports and actions related to these evaluations should provide feedback into relevant courses or programmes. AOSIS 2016-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6091753/ /pubmed/27246790 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v39i1.1516 Text en © 2016. The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pakkies, Ntefeleng E.
Mtshali, Ntombifikile G.
Students’ views on the block evaluation process: A descriptive analysis
title Students’ views on the block evaluation process: A descriptive analysis
title_full Students’ views on the block evaluation process: A descriptive analysis
title_fullStr Students’ views on the block evaluation process: A descriptive analysis
title_full_unstemmed Students’ views on the block evaluation process: A descriptive analysis
title_short Students’ views on the block evaluation process: A descriptive analysis
title_sort students’ views on the block evaluation process: a descriptive analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6091753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27246790
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v39i1.1516
work_keys_str_mv AT pakkiesntefelenge studentsviewsontheblockevaluationprocessadescriptiveanalysis
AT mtshalintombifikileg studentsviewsontheblockevaluationprocessadescriptiveanalysis