Cargando…
An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy
Objective We wanted to examine the incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER) for a variety of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved oncology drugs in the adjuvant or curative setting to determine the value provided. Design We examined the annualized incremental drug costs of a variety of FDA app...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6092191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116683 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2810 |
_version_ | 1783347492214013952 |
---|---|
author | Hancock, Christie Green, Linda Lestingi, Timothy Bitran, MD, Jacob |
author_facet | Hancock, Christie Green, Linda Lestingi, Timothy Bitran, MD, Jacob |
author_sort | Hancock, Christie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective We wanted to examine the incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER) for a variety of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved oncology drugs in the adjuvant or curative setting to determine the value provided. Design We examined the annualized incremental drug costs of a variety of FDA approved chemotherapeutic drugs used in an adjuvant or curative setting based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) category 1 practice guidelines for melanoma, Her2/neu over-expressive breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, myeloma, B cell lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma. The studies we examined were randomized clinical trials on which the NCCN guidelines are based; we solely examined the incremental cost-effectiveness of the trial drug as we assumed that the costs of the health care provided were equivalent between the two treatment arms. We used a formula to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The ICER compares a new intervention (C new) with its alternate (C alt) divided by the quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) that results from the new intervention (QALY new) versus the alternate (QALY alt) and is expressed as ICER = (C new-C alt)/(QALY new-QALY alt). The QALY’s were derived from what was reported in the study and based on the incremental disease-free survival. Results Drugs such as rituximab provide high value in the curative therapy for lymphoma. Drugs such as adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib provide intermediate value in the treatment of melanoma, and similarly with maintenance lenalidomide in myeloma and adjuvant trastuzumab in breast cancer. Oncologic drugs that provide low value include adjuvant ipilimumab in melanoma, adjuvant sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma, adjuvant neratinib in breast cancer, adjuvant durvalumab in lung cancer, and brentuximab in the curative therapy for Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Conclusion The ICER needs to be evaluated for newly approved FDA oncology chemotherapeutic drugs before incorporating them into routine clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6092191 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60921912018-08-16 An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy Hancock, Christie Green, Linda Lestingi, Timothy Bitran, MD, Jacob Cureus Oncology Objective We wanted to examine the incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER) for a variety of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved oncology drugs in the adjuvant or curative setting to determine the value provided. Design We examined the annualized incremental drug costs of a variety of FDA approved chemotherapeutic drugs used in an adjuvant or curative setting based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) category 1 practice guidelines for melanoma, Her2/neu over-expressive breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, myeloma, B cell lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma. The studies we examined were randomized clinical trials on which the NCCN guidelines are based; we solely examined the incremental cost-effectiveness of the trial drug as we assumed that the costs of the health care provided were equivalent between the two treatment arms. We used a formula to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The ICER compares a new intervention (C new) with its alternate (C alt) divided by the quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) that results from the new intervention (QALY new) versus the alternate (QALY alt) and is expressed as ICER = (C new-C alt)/(QALY new-QALY alt). The QALY’s were derived from what was reported in the study and based on the incremental disease-free survival. Results Drugs such as rituximab provide high value in the curative therapy for lymphoma. Drugs such as adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib provide intermediate value in the treatment of melanoma, and similarly with maintenance lenalidomide in myeloma and adjuvant trastuzumab in breast cancer. Oncologic drugs that provide low value include adjuvant ipilimumab in melanoma, adjuvant sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma, adjuvant neratinib in breast cancer, adjuvant durvalumab in lung cancer, and brentuximab in the curative therapy for Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Conclusion The ICER needs to be evaluated for newly approved FDA oncology chemotherapeutic drugs before incorporating them into routine clinical practice. Cureus 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6092191/ /pubmed/30116683 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2810 Text en Copyright © 2018, Hancock et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Hancock, Christie Green, Linda Lestingi, Timothy Bitran, MD, Jacob An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy |
title | An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy |
title_full | An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy |
title_fullStr | An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy |
title_short | An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy |
title_sort | attempt to quantitate “value” in medical oncologic therapy |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6092191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116683 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2810 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hancockchristie anattempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy AT greenlinda anattempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy AT lestingitimothy anattempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy AT bitranmdjacob anattempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy AT hancockchristie attempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy AT greenlinda attempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy AT lestingitimothy attempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy AT bitranmdjacob attempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy |