Cargando…

An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy

Objective We wanted to examine the incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER) for a variety of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved oncology drugs in the adjuvant or curative setting to determine the value provided. Design We examined the annualized incremental drug costs of a variety of FDA app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hancock, Christie, Green, Linda, Lestingi, Timothy, Bitran, MD, Jacob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6092191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116683
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2810
_version_ 1783347492214013952
author Hancock, Christie
Green, Linda
Lestingi, Timothy
Bitran, MD, Jacob
author_facet Hancock, Christie
Green, Linda
Lestingi, Timothy
Bitran, MD, Jacob
author_sort Hancock, Christie
collection PubMed
description Objective We wanted to examine the incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER) for a variety of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved oncology drugs in the adjuvant or curative setting to determine the value provided. Design We examined the annualized incremental drug costs of a variety of FDA approved chemotherapeutic drugs used in an adjuvant or curative setting based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) category 1 practice guidelines for melanoma, Her2/neu over-expressive breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, myeloma, B cell lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma. The studies we examined were randomized clinical trials on which the NCCN guidelines are based; we solely examined the incremental cost-effectiveness of the trial drug as we assumed that the costs of the health care provided were equivalent between the two treatment arms. We used a formula to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The ICER compares a new intervention (C new) with its alternate (C alt) divided by the quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) that results from the new intervention (QALY new) versus the alternate (QALY alt) and is expressed as ICER = (C new-C alt)/(QALY new-QALY alt). The QALY’s were derived from what was reported in the study and based on the incremental disease-free survival. Results Drugs such as rituximab provide high value in the curative therapy for lymphoma. Drugs such as adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib provide intermediate value in the treatment of melanoma, and similarly with maintenance lenalidomide in myeloma and adjuvant trastuzumab in breast cancer. Oncologic drugs that provide low value include adjuvant ipilimumab in melanoma, adjuvant sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma, adjuvant neratinib in breast cancer, adjuvant durvalumab in lung cancer, and brentuximab in the curative therapy for Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Conclusion The ICER needs to be evaluated for newly approved FDA oncology chemotherapeutic drugs before incorporating them into routine clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6092191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60921912018-08-16 An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy Hancock, Christie Green, Linda Lestingi, Timothy Bitran, MD, Jacob Cureus Oncology Objective We wanted to examine the incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER) for a variety of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved oncology drugs in the adjuvant or curative setting to determine the value provided. Design We examined the annualized incremental drug costs of a variety of FDA approved chemotherapeutic drugs used in an adjuvant or curative setting based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) category 1 practice guidelines for melanoma, Her2/neu over-expressive breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, myeloma, B cell lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma. The studies we examined were randomized clinical trials on which the NCCN guidelines are based; we solely examined the incremental cost-effectiveness of the trial drug as we assumed that the costs of the health care provided were equivalent between the two treatment arms. We used a formula to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The ICER compares a new intervention (C new) with its alternate (C alt) divided by the quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) that results from the new intervention (QALY new) versus the alternate (QALY alt) and is expressed as ICER = (C new-C alt)/(QALY new-QALY alt). The QALY’s were derived from what was reported in the study and based on the incremental disease-free survival. Results Drugs such as rituximab provide high value in the curative therapy for lymphoma. Drugs such as adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib provide intermediate value in the treatment of melanoma, and similarly with maintenance lenalidomide in myeloma and adjuvant trastuzumab in breast cancer. Oncologic drugs that provide low value include adjuvant ipilimumab in melanoma, adjuvant sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma, adjuvant neratinib in breast cancer, adjuvant durvalumab in lung cancer, and brentuximab in the curative therapy for Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Conclusion The ICER needs to be evaluated for newly approved FDA oncology chemotherapeutic drugs before incorporating them into routine clinical practice. Cureus 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6092191/ /pubmed/30116683 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2810 Text en Copyright © 2018, Hancock et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Hancock, Christie
Green, Linda
Lestingi, Timothy
Bitran, MD, Jacob
An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy
title An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy
title_full An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy
title_fullStr An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy
title_full_unstemmed An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy
title_short An Attempt to Quantitate “Value” In Medical Oncologic Therapy
title_sort attempt to quantitate “value” in medical oncologic therapy
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6092191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116683
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2810
work_keys_str_mv AT hancockchristie anattempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy
AT greenlinda anattempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy
AT lestingitimothy anattempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy
AT bitranmdjacob anattempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy
AT hancockchristie attempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy
AT greenlinda attempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy
AT lestingitimothy attempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy
AT bitranmdjacob attempttoquantitatevalueinmedicaloncologictherapy