Cargando…

Penile refracture: a preliminary report

OBJECTIVE: To report our institutional experience with penile refracture, including demographic data, recurrence time, etiology and operative findings in the first and second episodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1982 and September 2017, 281 patients underwent surgical treatment for penil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barros, Rodrigo, Guimarães, Matheus, Nascimento, César, Araújo, Luis Rogério, Koifman, Leandro, Favorito, Luciano Alves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6092643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29757574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0124
_version_ 1783347566698561536
author Barros, Rodrigo
Guimarães, Matheus
Nascimento, César
Araújo, Luis Rogério
Koifman, Leandro
Favorito, Luciano Alves
author_facet Barros, Rodrigo
Guimarães, Matheus
Nascimento, César
Araújo, Luis Rogério
Koifman, Leandro
Favorito, Luciano Alves
author_sort Barros, Rodrigo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To report our institutional experience with penile refracture, including demographic data, recurrence time, etiology and operative findings in the first and second episodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1982 and September 2017, 281 patients underwent surgical treatment for penile fracture (PF) at our institution. Demographic data, clinical presentation, besides operative findings and follow-up of patients with relapsed PF were retrospectively assessed by reviewing medical records. RESULTS: Of a total of 281 cases of PF operated at our institution, 3 (1.06%) patients experienced two episodes of trauma. Age ranged from 38 – 40 years (mean: 39.3). The recurrence time varied from 45 to 1560 days (mean: 705). Two patients presented the new fracture episode at the same site of the previous lesion, while in the other case the lesion was observed at another site. CONCLUSION: Recurrent FP is an extremely rare entity. The risk factors for its occurrence are still unknown. Although the lesion of the corpus cavernosum ipsilateral to the scar tissue of the prior FP is more common, contralateral rupture may be present. Nevertheless, prospective studies with larger samples should be conducted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6092643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60926432018-08-15 Penile refracture: a preliminary report Barros, Rodrigo Guimarães, Matheus Nascimento, César Araújo, Luis Rogério Koifman, Leandro Favorito, Luciano Alves Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To report our institutional experience with penile refracture, including demographic data, recurrence time, etiology and operative findings in the first and second episodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1982 and September 2017, 281 patients underwent surgical treatment for penile fracture (PF) at our institution. Demographic data, clinical presentation, besides operative findings and follow-up of patients with relapsed PF were retrospectively assessed by reviewing medical records. RESULTS: Of a total of 281 cases of PF operated at our institution, 3 (1.06%) patients experienced two episodes of trauma. Age ranged from 38 – 40 years (mean: 39.3). The recurrence time varied from 45 to 1560 days (mean: 705). Two patients presented the new fracture episode at the same site of the previous lesion, while in the other case the lesion was observed at another site. CONCLUSION: Recurrent FP is an extremely rare entity. The risk factors for its occurrence are still unknown. Although the lesion of the corpus cavernosum ipsilateral to the scar tissue of the prior FP is more common, contralateral rupture may be present. Nevertheless, prospective studies with larger samples should be conducted. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6092643/ /pubmed/29757574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0124 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Barros, Rodrigo
Guimarães, Matheus
Nascimento, César
Araújo, Luis Rogério
Koifman, Leandro
Favorito, Luciano Alves
Penile refracture: a preliminary report
title Penile refracture: a preliminary report
title_full Penile refracture: a preliminary report
title_fullStr Penile refracture: a preliminary report
title_full_unstemmed Penile refracture: a preliminary report
title_short Penile refracture: a preliminary report
title_sort penile refracture: a preliminary report
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6092643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29757574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0124
work_keys_str_mv AT barrosrodrigo penilerefractureapreliminaryreport
AT guimaraesmatheus penilerefractureapreliminaryreport
AT nascimentocesar penilerefractureapreliminaryreport
AT araujoluisrogerio penilerefractureapreliminaryreport
AT koifmanleandro penilerefractureapreliminaryreport
AT favoritolucianoalves penilerefractureapreliminaryreport