Cargando…

Comparison of inflammatory markers between brucella and non-brucella epididymo-orchitis

OBJECTIVES: Brucellosis is a multi-system infectious disease that is associated with inflammation, which causes an increase in acute phase reactants. Hematological inflammatory markers of brucellosis include mean platelet volume (MPV), red cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cift, Ali, Yucel, Mehmet Ozgur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6092658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29697933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0004.0
_version_ 1783347570185076736
author Cift, Ali
Yucel, Mehmet Ozgur
author_facet Cift, Ali
Yucel, Mehmet Ozgur
author_sort Cift, Ali
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Brucellosis is a multi-system infectious disease that is associated with inflammation, which causes an increase in acute phase reactants. Hematological inflammatory markers of brucellosis include mean platelet volume (MPV), red cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of hematological inflammatory markers in Brucella epididymo-orchitis (BEO), and to investigate the utility of these markers for differential diagnosis from non-Brucella epididymo-orchitis (non-BEO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 22 BEO and 50 non-BEO patients. Hematological parameters were recorded and compared between the two groups. The main diagnostic criteria for BEO were positive clinical findings (i.e., testicular pain, tenderness and scrotal swelling), a positive Rose Bengal test result, standard tube agglutination (STA) titer ≥ 1/160, and/or a positive blood culture. RESULTS: The most decisive factors in discriminating between BEO and non-BEO were NLR, RDW, and MPV, in decreasing order of their strength. Regardless of other factors, NLR values < 2.3 significantly increased the odds of BEO (OR=8.080, 95% CI: 1.929-33.843, p=0.004). After adjusting for other factors, RDW values >14.45% significantly increased the odds of BEO (OR=7.020, 95% CI: 1.749-28.176, p=0.006). Independent of the other factors, patients with MPV < 7.65 fL had a 6.336 times higher risk for BEO (95% CI: 1.393 - 28.822, p=0.017). CONCLUSION: Hematological inflammatory markers such as NLR, RDW, and MPV can aid in the differential diagnosis of BEO and non-BEO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6092658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60926582018-08-15 Comparison of inflammatory markers between brucella and non-brucella epididymo-orchitis Cift, Ali Yucel, Mehmet Ozgur Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVES: Brucellosis is a multi-system infectious disease that is associated with inflammation, which causes an increase in acute phase reactants. Hematological inflammatory markers of brucellosis include mean platelet volume (MPV), red cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of hematological inflammatory markers in Brucella epididymo-orchitis (BEO), and to investigate the utility of these markers for differential diagnosis from non-Brucella epididymo-orchitis (non-BEO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 22 BEO and 50 non-BEO patients. Hematological parameters were recorded and compared between the two groups. The main diagnostic criteria for BEO were positive clinical findings (i.e., testicular pain, tenderness and scrotal swelling), a positive Rose Bengal test result, standard tube agglutination (STA) titer ≥ 1/160, and/or a positive blood culture. RESULTS: The most decisive factors in discriminating between BEO and non-BEO were NLR, RDW, and MPV, in decreasing order of their strength. Regardless of other factors, NLR values < 2.3 significantly increased the odds of BEO (OR=8.080, 95% CI: 1.929-33.843, p=0.004). After adjusting for other factors, RDW values >14.45% significantly increased the odds of BEO (OR=7.020, 95% CI: 1.749-28.176, p=0.006). Independent of the other factors, patients with MPV < 7.65 fL had a 6.336 times higher risk for BEO (95% CI: 1.393 - 28.822, p=0.017). CONCLUSION: Hematological inflammatory markers such as NLR, RDW, and MPV can aid in the differential diagnosis of BEO and non-BEO. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6092658/ /pubmed/29697933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0004.0 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cift, Ali
Yucel, Mehmet Ozgur
Comparison of inflammatory markers between brucella and non-brucella epididymo-orchitis
title Comparison of inflammatory markers between brucella and non-brucella epididymo-orchitis
title_full Comparison of inflammatory markers between brucella and non-brucella epididymo-orchitis
title_fullStr Comparison of inflammatory markers between brucella and non-brucella epididymo-orchitis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of inflammatory markers between brucella and non-brucella epididymo-orchitis
title_short Comparison of inflammatory markers between brucella and non-brucella epididymo-orchitis
title_sort comparison of inflammatory markers between brucella and non-brucella epididymo-orchitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6092658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29697933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0004.0
work_keys_str_mv AT ciftali comparisonofinflammatorymarkersbetweenbrucellaandnonbrucellaepididymoorchitis
AT yucelmehmetozgur comparisonofinflammatorymarkersbetweenbrucellaandnonbrucellaepididymoorchitis