Cargando…

Core Hunter 3: flexible core subset selection

BACKGROUND: Core collections provide genebank curators and plant breeders a way to reduce size of their collections and populations, while minimizing impact on genetic diversity and allele frequency. Many methods have been proposed to generate core collections, often using distance metrics to quanti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Beukelaer, Herman, Davenport, Guy F, Fack, Veerle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6092719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29855322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2209-z
_version_ 1783347582479630336
author De Beukelaer, Herman
Davenport, Guy F
Fack, Veerle
author_facet De Beukelaer, Herman
Davenport, Guy F
Fack, Veerle
author_sort De Beukelaer, Herman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Core collections provide genebank curators and plant breeders a way to reduce size of their collections and populations, while minimizing impact on genetic diversity and allele frequency. Many methods have been proposed to generate core collections, often using distance metrics to quantify the similarity of two accessions, based on genetic marker data or phenotypic traits. Core Hunter is a multi-purpose core subset selection tool that uses local search algorithms to generate subsets relying on one or more metrics, including several distance metrics and allelic richness. RESULTS: In version 3 of Core Hunter (CH3) we have incorporated two new, improved methods for summarizing distances to quantify diversity or representativeness of the core collection. A comparison of CH3 and Core Hunter 2 (CH2) showed that these new metrics can be effectively optimized with less complex algorithms, as compared to those used in CH2. CH3 is more effective at maximizing the improved diversity metric than CH2, still ensures a high average and minimum distance, and is faster for large datasets. Using CH3, a simple stochastic hill-climber is able to find highly diverse core collections, and the more advanced parallel tempering algorithm further increases the quality of the core and further reduces variability across independent samples. We also evaluate the ability of CH3 to simultaneously maximize diversity, and either representativeness or allelic richness, and compare the results with those of the GDOpt and SimEli methods. CH3 can sample equally representative cores as GDOpt, which was specifically designed for this purpose, and is able to construct cores that are simultaneously more diverse, and either are more representative or have higher allelic richness, than those obtained by SimEli. CONCLUSIONS: In version 3, Core Hunter has been updated to include two new core subset selection metrics that construct cores for representativeness or diversity, with improved performance. It combines and outperforms the strengths of other methods, as it (simultaneously) optimizes a variety of metrics. In addition, CH3 is an improvement over CH2, with the option to use genetic marker data or phenotypic traits, or both, and improved speed. Core Hunter 3 is freely available on http://www.corehunter.org.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6092719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60927192018-08-20 Core Hunter 3: flexible core subset selection De Beukelaer, Herman Davenport, Guy F Fack, Veerle BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Core collections provide genebank curators and plant breeders a way to reduce size of their collections and populations, while minimizing impact on genetic diversity and allele frequency. Many methods have been proposed to generate core collections, often using distance metrics to quantify the similarity of two accessions, based on genetic marker data or phenotypic traits. Core Hunter is a multi-purpose core subset selection tool that uses local search algorithms to generate subsets relying on one or more metrics, including several distance metrics and allelic richness. RESULTS: In version 3 of Core Hunter (CH3) we have incorporated two new, improved methods for summarizing distances to quantify diversity or representativeness of the core collection. A comparison of CH3 and Core Hunter 2 (CH2) showed that these new metrics can be effectively optimized with less complex algorithms, as compared to those used in CH2. CH3 is more effective at maximizing the improved diversity metric than CH2, still ensures a high average and minimum distance, and is faster for large datasets. Using CH3, a simple stochastic hill-climber is able to find highly diverse core collections, and the more advanced parallel tempering algorithm further increases the quality of the core and further reduces variability across independent samples. We also evaluate the ability of CH3 to simultaneously maximize diversity, and either representativeness or allelic richness, and compare the results with those of the GDOpt and SimEli methods. CH3 can sample equally representative cores as GDOpt, which was specifically designed for this purpose, and is able to construct cores that are simultaneously more diverse, and either are more representative or have higher allelic richness, than those obtained by SimEli. CONCLUSIONS: In version 3, Core Hunter has been updated to include two new core subset selection metrics that construct cores for representativeness or diversity, with improved performance. It combines and outperforms the strengths of other methods, as it (simultaneously) optimizes a variety of metrics. In addition, CH3 is an improvement over CH2, with the option to use genetic marker data or phenotypic traits, or both, and improved speed. Core Hunter 3 is freely available on http://www.corehunter.org. BioMed Central 2018-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6092719/ /pubmed/29855322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2209-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
De Beukelaer, Herman
Davenport, Guy F
Fack, Veerle
Core Hunter 3: flexible core subset selection
title Core Hunter 3: flexible core subset selection
title_full Core Hunter 3: flexible core subset selection
title_fullStr Core Hunter 3: flexible core subset selection
title_full_unstemmed Core Hunter 3: flexible core subset selection
title_short Core Hunter 3: flexible core subset selection
title_sort core hunter 3: flexible core subset selection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6092719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29855322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2209-z
work_keys_str_mv AT debeukelaerherman corehunter3flexiblecoresubsetselection
AT davenportguyf corehunter3flexiblecoresubsetselection
AT fackveerle corehunter3flexiblecoresubsetselection