Cargando…

A loss of heterozygosity, a loss in competition? The effects of inbreeding, pre‐ and postnatal conditions on nestling development

The early developmental trajectory is affected by genetic and environmental factors that co‐depend and interact often in a complex way. In order to distinguish their respective roles, we used canaries (Serinus canaria) of different genetic backgrounds (inbred and outbred birds). An artificial size h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Boer, Raïssa A., Eens, Marcel, Müller, Wendt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6093172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2496
_version_ 1783347664661774336
author de Boer, Raïssa A.
Eens, Marcel
Müller, Wendt
author_facet de Boer, Raïssa A.
Eens, Marcel
Müller, Wendt
author_sort de Boer, Raïssa A.
collection PubMed
description The early developmental trajectory is affected by genetic and environmental factors that co‐depend and interact often in a complex way. In order to distinguish their respective roles, we used canaries (Serinus canaria) of different genetic backgrounds (inbred and outbred birds). An artificial size hierarchy was created to provoke within‐nest competition, manipulating postnatal conditions. To this end, inbred birds were weight‐matched with outbred birds into duos, and each nest contained one duo of size‐advantaged, and one duo of size‐disadvantaged inbred and outbred nestlings. Prenatal (maternal) effects were taken into account also, enabling us to study the separate as well as the interactive effects of inbreeding, pre‐ and postnatal conditions on nestling development. We find that postnatal conditions were the most important determinant of early growth, with size‐advantaged nestlings growing faster and obtaining larger size/body mass at fledging in comparison with size‐disadvantaged nestlings. Prenatal conditions were important too, with birds that hatched from eggs that were laid late in the laying order obtaining a larger size at fledging than those hatched from early laid eggs. Inbreeding inhibited growth, but surprisingly this did not depend on (dis)advantageous pre‐ or postnatal conditions. Our findings imply that inbred individuals lose when they are in direct competition with same‐sized outbred individuals regardless of the rearing conditions, and we thus propose that reduced competitiveness is one of the driving forces of inbreeding depression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6093172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60931722018-08-20 A loss of heterozygosity, a loss in competition? The effects of inbreeding, pre‐ and postnatal conditions on nestling development de Boer, Raïssa A. Eens, Marcel Müller, Wendt Ecol Evol Original Research The early developmental trajectory is affected by genetic and environmental factors that co‐depend and interact often in a complex way. In order to distinguish their respective roles, we used canaries (Serinus canaria) of different genetic backgrounds (inbred and outbred birds). An artificial size hierarchy was created to provoke within‐nest competition, manipulating postnatal conditions. To this end, inbred birds were weight‐matched with outbred birds into duos, and each nest contained one duo of size‐advantaged, and one duo of size‐disadvantaged inbred and outbred nestlings. Prenatal (maternal) effects were taken into account also, enabling us to study the separate as well as the interactive effects of inbreeding, pre‐ and postnatal conditions on nestling development. We find that postnatal conditions were the most important determinant of early growth, with size‐advantaged nestlings growing faster and obtaining larger size/body mass at fledging in comparison with size‐disadvantaged nestlings. Prenatal conditions were important too, with birds that hatched from eggs that were laid late in the laying order obtaining a larger size at fledging than those hatched from early laid eggs. Inbreeding inhibited growth, but surprisingly this did not depend on (dis)advantageous pre‐ or postnatal conditions. Our findings imply that inbred individuals lose when they are in direct competition with same‐sized outbred individuals regardless of the rearing conditions, and we thus propose that reduced competitiveness is one of the driving forces of inbreeding depression. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6093172/ /pubmed/30128140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2496 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
de Boer, Raïssa A.
Eens, Marcel
Müller, Wendt
A loss of heterozygosity, a loss in competition? The effects of inbreeding, pre‐ and postnatal conditions on nestling development
title A loss of heterozygosity, a loss in competition? The effects of inbreeding, pre‐ and postnatal conditions on nestling development
title_full A loss of heterozygosity, a loss in competition? The effects of inbreeding, pre‐ and postnatal conditions on nestling development
title_fullStr A loss of heterozygosity, a loss in competition? The effects of inbreeding, pre‐ and postnatal conditions on nestling development
title_full_unstemmed A loss of heterozygosity, a loss in competition? The effects of inbreeding, pre‐ and postnatal conditions on nestling development
title_short A loss of heterozygosity, a loss in competition? The effects of inbreeding, pre‐ and postnatal conditions on nestling development
title_sort loss of heterozygosity, a loss in competition? the effects of inbreeding, pre‐ and postnatal conditions on nestling development
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6093172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2496
work_keys_str_mv AT deboerraissaa alossofheterozygosityalossincompetitiontheeffectsofinbreedingpreandpostnatalconditionsonnestlingdevelopment
AT eensmarcel alossofheterozygosityalossincompetitiontheeffectsofinbreedingpreandpostnatalconditionsonnestlingdevelopment
AT mullerwendt alossofheterozygosityalossincompetitiontheeffectsofinbreedingpreandpostnatalconditionsonnestlingdevelopment
AT deboerraissaa lossofheterozygosityalossincompetitiontheeffectsofinbreedingpreandpostnatalconditionsonnestlingdevelopment
AT eensmarcel lossofheterozygosityalossincompetitiontheeffectsofinbreedingpreandpostnatalconditionsonnestlingdevelopment
AT mullerwendt lossofheterozygosityalossincompetitiontheeffectsofinbreedingpreandpostnatalconditionsonnestlingdevelopment