Cargando…

Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): An Abridged Explanation and Elaboration

The Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK) were developed to address widespread deficiencies in the reporting of such studies. The REMARK checklist consists of 20 items to report for published tumor marker prognostic studies. A detailed paper was published explaining...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sauerbrei, Willi, Taube, Sheila E, McShane, Lisa M, Cavenagh, Margaret M, Altman, Douglas G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6093349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29873743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy088
_version_ 1783347678759878656
author Sauerbrei, Willi
Taube, Sheila E
McShane, Lisa M
Cavenagh, Margaret M
Altman, Douglas G
author_facet Sauerbrei, Willi
Taube, Sheila E
McShane, Lisa M
Cavenagh, Margaret M
Altman, Douglas G
author_sort Sauerbrei, Willi
collection PubMed
description The Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK) were developed to address widespread deficiencies in the reporting of such studies. The REMARK checklist consists of 20 items to report for published tumor marker prognostic studies. A detailed paper was published explaining the rationale behind checklist items, providing positive examples and giving empirical evidence of the quality of reporting. REMARK provides a comprehensive overview to educate on good reporting and provide a valuable reference for the many issues to consider when designing, conducting, and analyzing tumor marker studies and prognostic studies in medicine in general. Despite support for REMARK from major cancer journals, prognostic factor research studies remain poorly reported. To encourage dissemination and uptake of REMARK, we have produced this considerably abridged version of the detailed explanatory manuscript, which may also serve as a brief guide to key issues for investigators planning tumor marker prognostic studies. To summarize the current situation, more recent papers investigating the quality of reporting and related reporting guidelines are cited, but otherwise the literature is not updated. Another important impetus for this paper is that it serves as a basis for literal translations into other languages. Translations will help to bring key information to a larger audience world-wide. Many more details can be found in the original paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6093349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60933492018-08-22 Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): An Abridged Explanation and Elaboration Sauerbrei, Willi Taube, Sheila E McShane, Lisa M Cavenagh, Margaret M Altman, Douglas G J Natl Cancer Inst Commentary The Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK) were developed to address widespread deficiencies in the reporting of such studies. The REMARK checklist consists of 20 items to report for published tumor marker prognostic studies. A detailed paper was published explaining the rationale behind checklist items, providing positive examples and giving empirical evidence of the quality of reporting. REMARK provides a comprehensive overview to educate on good reporting and provide a valuable reference for the many issues to consider when designing, conducting, and analyzing tumor marker studies and prognostic studies in medicine in general. Despite support for REMARK from major cancer journals, prognostic factor research studies remain poorly reported. To encourage dissemination and uptake of REMARK, we have produced this considerably abridged version of the detailed explanatory manuscript, which may also serve as a brief guide to key issues for investigators planning tumor marker prognostic studies. To summarize the current situation, more recent papers investigating the quality of reporting and related reporting guidelines are cited, but otherwise the literature is not updated. Another important impetus for this paper is that it serves as a basis for literal translations into other languages. Translations will help to bring key information to a larger audience world-wide. Many more details can be found in the original paper. Oxford University Press 2018-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6093349/ /pubmed/29873743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy088 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Commentary
Sauerbrei, Willi
Taube, Sheila E
McShane, Lisa M
Cavenagh, Margaret M
Altman, Douglas G
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): An Abridged Explanation and Elaboration
title Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): An Abridged Explanation and Elaboration
title_full Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): An Abridged Explanation and Elaboration
title_fullStr Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): An Abridged Explanation and Elaboration
title_full_unstemmed Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): An Abridged Explanation and Elaboration
title_short Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): An Abridged Explanation and Elaboration
title_sort reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (remark): an abridged explanation and elaboration
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6093349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29873743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy088
work_keys_str_mv AT sauerbreiwilli reportingrecommendationsfortumormarkerprognosticstudiesremarkanabridgedexplanationandelaboration
AT taubesheilae reportingrecommendationsfortumormarkerprognosticstudiesremarkanabridgedexplanationandelaboration
AT mcshanelisam reportingrecommendationsfortumormarkerprognosticstudiesremarkanabridgedexplanationandelaboration
AT cavenaghmargaretm reportingrecommendationsfortumormarkerprognosticstudiesremarkanabridgedexplanationandelaboration
AT altmandouglasg reportingrecommendationsfortumormarkerprognosticstudiesremarkanabridgedexplanationandelaboration