Cargando…

A National Comparison of Dual Users of Smokeless Tobacco and Cigarettes and Exclusive Cigarette Smokers, 2015–2016

INTRODUCTION: While smoking rates have declined, use of smokeless tobacco (ST) has remained constant. ST is heavily marketed to cigarette smokers, and many ST users smoke cigarettes. This study provides updated comparisons of the characteristics, smoking behaviors, and perceptions of US adult dual S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Dina M, Popova, Lucy, Weaver, Scott R, Pechacek, Terry F, Eriksen, Michael P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6093383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30125015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty010
_version_ 1783347683191160832
author Jones, Dina M
Popova, Lucy
Weaver, Scott R
Pechacek, Terry F
Eriksen, Michael P
author_facet Jones, Dina M
Popova, Lucy
Weaver, Scott R
Pechacek, Terry F
Eriksen, Michael P
author_sort Jones, Dina M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While smoking rates have declined, use of smokeless tobacco (ST) has remained constant. ST is heavily marketed to cigarette smokers, and many ST users smoke cigarettes. This study provides updated comparisons of the characteristics, smoking behaviors, and perceptions of US adult dual ST and cigarette users and exclusive cigarette smokers in 2015–2016. METHODS: Data were from nationally representative, cross-sectional surveys from 2015 and 2016. Adult smokers reported past 30-day use of ST, current cigarette smoking, risk perceptions, smoking, and quitting behaviors. We estimated Rao–Scott χ(2) and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) to compare dual users and exclusive smokers. RESULTS: Dual users were more likely to be younger, reside in nonmetropolitan statistical areas (MSA) and outside the Northeast United States. Adjusting for covariates, dual users did not differ significantly from exclusive smokers on most smoker characteristics, including number of past year quit attempts. Dual users were more likely to report past 30-day use of novel tobacco products (AORs 2.90 [little cigars and cigarillos] to 11.02 [hookah]). Dual users who reported at least 1 past year cigarette quit attempt were more likely than exclusive smokers to report using ST, traditional cigars, hookah, or heat-not-burn as a past year quit method (AOR: 9.54 [95% CI: 3.22 to 28.23]). CONCLUSIONS: Smokers who use ST are more likely than exclusive smokers to attempt to quit smoking cigarettes using other tobacco products. These findings may be attributed to increasing use prevalence of novel products. We recommend further monitoring to assess polytobacco use and differences among these populations. IMPLICATIONS: Many current ST users smoke cigarettes and ST promotions often target cigarette smokers. As the FDA considers ST regulations and implements a nicotine centered regulatory framework, it is imperative to evaluate how these policies and promotion of ST as potentially reduced risk products impact dual and polytobacco use. Our study found that many dual users engage in novel tobacco use in general and as a cessation method. Consideration of ST and polytobacco use among smokers may be helpful in the development of forthcoming FDA regulations, messaging, and interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6093383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60933832018-08-22 A National Comparison of Dual Users of Smokeless Tobacco and Cigarettes and Exclusive Cigarette Smokers, 2015–2016 Jones, Dina M Popova, Lucy Weaver, Scott R Pechacek, Terry F Eriksen, Michael P Nicotine Tob Res Original Investigations INTRODUCTION: While smoking rates have declined, use of smokeless tobacco (ST) has remained constant. ST is heavily marketed to cigarette smokers, and many ST users smoke cigarettes. This study provides updated comparisons of the characteristics, smoking behaviors, and perceptions of US adult dual ST and cigarette users and exclusive cigarette smokers in 2015–2016. METHODS: Data were from nationally representative, cross-sectional surveys from 2015 and 2016. Adult smokers reported past 30-day use of ST, current cigarette smoking, risk perceptions, smoking, and quitting behaviors. We estimated Rao–Scott χ(2) and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) to compare dual users and exclusive smokers. RESULTS: Dual users were more likely to be younger, reside in nonmetropolitan statistical areas (MSA) and outside the Northeast United States. Adjusting for covariates, dual users did not differ significantly from exclusive smokers on most smoker characteristics, including number of past year quit attempts. Dual users were more likely to report past 30-day use of novel tobacco products (AORs 2.90 [little cigars and cigarillos] to 11.02 [hookah]). Dual users who reported at least 1 past year cigarette quit attempt were more likely than exclusive smokers to report using ST, traditional cigars, hookah, or heat-not-burn as a past year quit method (AOR: 9.54 [95% CI: 3.22 to 28.23]). CONCLUSIONS: Smokers who use ST are more likely than exclusive smokers to attempt to quit smoking cigarettes using other tobacco products. These findings may be attributed to increasing use prevalence of novel products. We recommend further monitoring to assess polytobacco use and differences among these populations. IMPLICATIONS: Many current ST users smoke cigarettes and ST promotions often target cigarette smokers. As the FDA considers ST regulations and implements a nicotine centered regulatory framework, it is imperative to evaluate how these policies and promotion of ST as potentially reduced risk products impact dual and polytobacco use. Our study found that many dual users engage in novel tobacco use in general and as a cessation method. Consideration of ST and polytobacco use among smokers may be helpful in the development of forthcoming FDA regulations, messaging, and interventions. Oxford University Press 2018-09 2018-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6093383/ /pubmed/30125015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty010 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Investigations
Jones, Dina M
Popova, Lucy
Weaver, Scott R
Pechacek, Terry F
Eriksen, Michael P
A National Comparison of Dual Users of Smokeless Tobacco and Cigarettes and Exclusive Cigarette Smokers, 2015–2016
title A National Comparison of Dual Users of Smokeless Tobacco and Cigarettes and Exclusive Cigarette Smokers, 2015–2016
title_full A National Comparison of Dual Users of Smokeless Tobacco and Cigarettes and Exclusive Cigarette Smokers, 2015–2016
title_fullStr A National Comparison of Dual Users of Smokeless Tobacco and Cigarettes and Exclusive Cigarette Smokers, 2015–2016
title_full_unstemmed A National Comparison of Dual Users of Smokeless Tobacco and Cigarettes and Exclusive Cigarette Smokers, 2015–2016
title_short A National Comparison of Dual Users of Smokeless Tobacco and Cigarettes and Exclusive Cigarette Smokers, 2015–2016
title_sort national comparison of dual users of smokeless tobacco and cigarettes and exclusive cigarette smokers, 2015–2016
topic Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6093383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30125015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nty010
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesdinam anationalcomparisonofdualusersofsmokelesstobaccoandcigarettesandexclusivecigarettesmokers20152016
AT popovalucy anationalcomparisonofdualusersofsmokelesstobaccoandcigarettesandexclusivecigarettesmokers20152016
AT weaverscottr anationalcomparisonofdualusersofsmokelesstobaccoandcigarettesandexclusivecigarettesmokers20152016
AT pechacekterryf anationalcomparisonofdualusersofsmokelesstobaccoandcigarettesandexclusivecigarettesmokers20152016
AT eriksenmichaelp anationalcomparisonofdualusersofsmokelesstobaccoandcigarettesandexclusivecigarettesmokers20152016
AT jonesdinam nationalcomparisonofdualusersofsmokelesstobaccoandcigarettesandexclusivecigarettesmokers20152016
AT popovalucy nationalcomparisonofdualusersofsmokelesstobaccoandcigarettesandexclusivecigarettesmokers20152016
AT weaverscottr nationalcomparisonofdualusersofsmokelesstobaccoandcigarettesandexclusivecigarettesmokers20152016
AT pechacekterryf nationalcomparisonofdualusersofsmokelesstobaccoandcigarettesandexclusivecigarettesmokers20152016
AT eriksenmichaelp nationalcomparisonofdualusersofsmokelesstobaccoandcigarettesandexclusivecigarettesmokers20152016