Cargando…

Antenna proton sensitivity determines photosynthetic light harvesting strategy

Photoprotective non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) represents an effective way to dissipate the light energy absorbed in excess by most phototrophs. It is often claimed that NPQ formation/relaxation kinetics are determined by xanthophyll composition. We, however, found that, for the alveolate alga Ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuthanová Trsková, Eliška, Belgio, Erica, Yeates, Anna M, Sobotka, Roman, Ruban, Alexander V, Kaňa, Radek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6093471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29955883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery240
_version_ 1783347689733226496
author Kuthanová Trsková, Eliška
Belgio, Erica
Yeates, Anna M
Sobotka, Roman
Ruban, Alexander V
Kaňa, Radek
author_facet Kuthanová Trsková, Eliška
Belgio, Erica
Yeates, Anna M
Sobotka, Roman
Ruban, Alexander V
Kaňa, Radek
author_sort Kuthanová Trsková, Eliška
collection PubMed
description Photoprotective non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) represents an effective way to dissipate the light energy absorbed in excess by most phototrophs. It is often claimed that NPQ formation/relaxation kinetics are determined by xanthophyll composition. We, however, found that, for the alveolate alga Chromera velia, this is not the case. In the present paper, we investigated the reasons for the constitutive high rate of quenching displayed by the alga by comparing its light harvesting strategies with those of a model phototroph, the land plant Spinacia oleracea. Experimental results and in silico studies support the idea that fast quenching is due not to xanthophylls, but to intrinsic properties of the Chromera light harvesting complex (CLH) protein, related to amino acid composition and protein folding. The pK(a) for CLH quenching was shifted by 0.5 units to a higher pH compared with higher plant antennas (light harvesting complex II; LHCII). We conclude that, whilst higher plant LHCIIs are better suited for light harvesting, CLHs are ‘natural quenchers’ ready to switch into a dissipative state. We propose that organisms with antenna proteins intrinsically more sensitive to protons, such as C. velia, carry a relatively high concentration of violaxanthin to improve their light harvesting. In contrast, higher plants need less violaxanthin per chlorophyll because LHCII proteins are more efficient light harvesters and instead require co-factors such as zeaxanthin and PsbS to accelerate and enhance quenching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6093471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60934712018-08-22 Antenna proton sensitivity determines photosynthetic light harvesting strategy Kuthanová Trsková, Eliška Belgio, Erica Yeates, Anna M Sobotka, Roman Ruban, Alexander V Kaňa, Radek J Exp Bot Research Papers Photoprotective non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) represents an effective way to dissipate the light energy absorbed in excess by most phototrophs. It is often claimed that NPQ formation/relaxation kinetics are determined by xanthophyll composition. We, however, found that, for the alveolate alga Chromera velia, this is not the case. In the present paper, we investigated the reasons for the constitutive high rate of quenching displayed by the alga by comparing its light harvesting strategies with those of a model phototroph, the land plant Spinacia oleracea. Experimental results and in silico studies support the idea that fast quenching is due not to xanthophylls, but to intrinsic properties of the Chromera light harvesting complex (CLH) protein, related to amino acid composition and protein folding. The pK(a) for CLH quenching was shifted by 0.5 units to a higher pH compared with higher plant antennas (light harvesting complex II; LHCII). We conclude that, whilst higher plant LHCIIs are better suited for light harvesting, CLHs are ‘natural quenchers’ ready to switch into a dissipative state. We propose that organisms with antenna proteins intrinsically more sensitive to protons, such as C. velia, carry a relatively high concentration of violaxanthin to improve their light harvesting. In contrast, higher plants need less violaxanthin per chlorophyll because LHCII proteins are more efficient light harvesters and instead require co-factors such as zeaxanthin and PsbS to accelerate and enhance quenching. Oxford University Press 2018-08-17 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6093471/ /pubmed/29955883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery240 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Kuthanová Trsková, Eliška
Belgio, Erica
Yeates, Anna M
Sobotka, Roman
Ruban, Alexander V
Kaňa, Radek
Antenna proton sensitivity determines photosynthetic light harvesting strategy
title Antenna proton sensitivity determines photosynthetic light harvesting strategy
title_full Antenna proton sensitivity determines photosynthetic light harvesting strategy
title_fullStr Antenna proton sensitivity determines photosynthetic light harvesting strategy
title_full_unstemmed Antenna proton sensitivity determines photosynthetic light harvesting strategy
title_short Antenna proton sensitivity determines photosynthetic light harvesting strategy
title_sort antenna proton sensitivity determines photosynthetic light harvesting strategy
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6093471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29955883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery240
work_keys_str_mv AT kuthanovatrskovaeliska antennaprotonsensitivitydeterminesphotosyntheticlightharvestingstrategy
AT belgioerica antennaprotonsensitivitydeterminesphotosyntheticlightharvestingstrategy
AT yeatesannam antennaprotonsensitivitydeterminesphotosyntheticlightharvestingstrategy
AT sobotkaroman antennaprotonsensitivitydeterminesphotosyntheticlightharvestingstrategy
AT rubanalexanderv antennaprotonsensitivitydeterminesphotosyntheticlightharvestingstrategy
AT kanaradek antennaprotonsensitivitydeterminesphotosyntheticlightharvestingstrategy