Cargando…

The effect of rearing photoperiod on broiler breeder reproductive performance depended on body weight

Body weight (BW) and rearing photoperiod are important factors affecting sexual maturation rate and reproductive performance in broiler breeders. The current experiment used a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement of treatments to study the interaction between BW and rearing photoperiod on reproductive perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Klein, S A S, Bédécarrats, G Y, Zuidhof, M J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Poultry Science Association, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6093749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29878187
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey199
_version_ 1783347719772831744
author van der Klein, S A S
Bédécarrats, G Y
Zuidhof, M J
author_facet van der Klein, S A S
Bédécarrats, G Y
Zuidhof, M J
author_sort van der Klein, S A S
collection PubMed
description Body weight (BW) and rearing photoperiod are important factors affecting sexual maturation rate and reproductive performance in broiler breeders. The current experiment used a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement of treatments to study the interaction between BW and rearing photoperiod on reproductive performance in group housed broiler breeder hens, while minimizing variation in BW. Hens (n = 180) were fed with a precision feeding system to allocate feed individually to achieve the breeder-recommended target curve (Standard) or to a target curve that reached the 21 wk BW at 18 wk (High). Hens were on 8L:16D, 10L:14D, or 12L:12D photoschedules during rearing and were photostimulated at 21 wk with a 16L:8D photoschedule. Sexual maturity (defined as age at first egg) and individual egg production to 55 wk were recorded. At 55 wk, proportional weights of individual body components were determined by dissection. Differences were reported as significant at P ≤ 0.05. A significant interaction between BW and rearing photoschedule affected age at sexual maturity and egg production. In the High BW treatment, age at sexual maturity did not differ between hens under the 8L:16D and 10L:14D photoschedules (173 vs. 172 d, respectively). In the Standard BW treatment, the 12L:12D rearing photoperiod delayed sexual maturity compared with the 8L:16D rearing photoperiod (266 vs. 180 d, respectively). All hens on the High BW treatment laid at least 1 egg before the end of the experiment. Conversely, 3.3, 18.1, and 37.6% of Standard BW hens on the 8L:16D, 10L:14D, and 12L:12D photoschedules, respectively, never commenced egg production. At the end of the experiment, proportional breast weight was higher and proportional fatpad weight was lower in Standard compared to High BW hens (25.8 vs. 27.5% and 2.4 vs. 1.5% of BW, respectively). We conclude that increased BW partially counters the effect of longer photoschedules on sexual maturity in broiler breeders and that dissipation of the photorefractory state depends on BW.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6093749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Poultry Science Association, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60937492018-08-22 The effect of rearing photoperiod on broiler breeder reproductive performance depended on body weight van der Klein, S A S Bédécarrats, G Y Zuidhof, M J Poult Sci Physiology and Reproduction Body weight (BW) and rearing photoperiod are important factors affecting sexual maturation rate and reproductive performance in broiler breeders. The current experiment used a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement of treatments to study the interaction between BW and rearing photoperiod on reproductive performance in group housed broiler breeder hens, while minimizing variation in BW. Hens (n = 180) were fed with a precision feeding system to allocate feed individually to achieve the breeder-recommended target curve (Standard) or to a target curve that reached the 21 wk BW at 18 wk (High). Hens were on 8L:16D, 10L:14D, or 12L:12D photoschedules during rearing and were photostimulated at 21 wk with a 16L:8D photoschedule. Sexual maturity (defined as age at first egg) and individual egg production to 55 wk were recorded. At 55 wk, proportional weights of individual body components were determined by dissection. Differences were reported as significant at P ≤ 0.05. A significant interaction between BW and rearing photoschedule affected age at sexual maturity and egg production. In the High BW treatment, age at sexual maturity did not differ between hens under the 8L:16D and 10L:14D photoschedules (173 vs. 172 d, respectively). In the Standard BW treatment, the 12L:12D rearing photoperiod delayed sexual maturity compared with the 8L:16D rearing photoperiod (266 vs. 180 d, respectively). All hens on the High BW treatment laid at least 1 egg before the end of the experiment. Conversely, 3.3, 18.1, and 37.6% of Standard BW hens on the 8L:16D, 10L:14D, and 12L:12D photoschedules, respectively, never commenced egg production. At the end of the experiment, proportional breast weight was higher and proportional fatpad weight was lower in Standard compared to High BW hens (25.8 vs. 27.5% and 2.4 vs. 1.5% of BW, respectively). We conclude that increased BW partially counters the effect of longer photoschedules on sexual maturity in broiler breeders and that dissipation of the photorefractory state depends on BW. Poultry Science Association, Inc. 2018-09 2018-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6093749/ /pubmed/29878187 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey199 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Poultry Science Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
spellingShingle Physiology and Reproduction
van der Klein, S A S
Bédécarrats, G Y
Zuidhof, M J
The effect of rearing photoperiod on broiler breeder reproductive performance depended on body weight
title The effect of rearing photoperiod on broiler breeder reproductive performance depended on body weight
title_full The effect of rearing photoperiod on broiler breeder reproductive performance depended on body weight
title_fullStr The effect of rearing photoperiod on broiler breeder reproductive performance depended on body weight
title_full_unstemmed The effect of rearing photoperiod on broiler breeder reproductive performance depended on body weight
title_short The effect of rearing photoperiod on broiler breeder reproductive performance depended on body weight
title_sort effect of rearing photoperiod on broiler breeder reproductive performance depended on body weight
topic Physiology and Reproduction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6093749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29878187
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey199
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderkleinsas theeffectofrearingphotoperiodonbroilerbreederreproductiveperformancedependedonbodyweight
AT bedecarratsgy theeffectofrearingphotoperiodonbroilerbreederreproductiveperformancedependedonbodyweight
AT zuidhofmj theeffectofrearingphotoperiodonbroilerbreederreproductiveperformancedependedonbodyweight
AT vanderkleinsas effectofrearingphotoperiodonbroilerbreederreproductiveperformancedependedonbodyweight
AT bedecarratsgy effectofrearingphotoperiodonbroilerbreederreproductiveperformancedependedonbodyweight
AT zuidhofmj effectofrearingphotoperiodonbroilerbreederreproductiveperformancedependedonbodyweight