Cargando…

Incidence and Risk Factors for Failure of Arthroscopic Posterior Capsulolabral Reconstruction

OBJECTIVES: Risk factors and outcomes of revision arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair is not well defined. It is hypothesized that athletes who require revision arthroscopic posterior unidirectional capsulolabral repair will have poorer outcomes and return to play with risk factors including...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bradley, James P., Arner, Justin W., Jayakumar, Sachidhanand, Vyas, Dharmesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6093987/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00153
_version_ 1783347754619109376
author Bradley, James P.
Arner, Justin W.
Jayakumar, Sachidhanand
Vyas, Dharmesh
author_facet Bradley, James P.
Arner, Justin W.
Jayakumar, Sachidhanand
Vyas, Dharmesh
author_sort Bradley, James P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Risk factors and outcomes of revision arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair is not well defined. It is hypothesized that athletes who require revision arthroscopic posterior unidirectional capsulolabral repair will have poorer outcomes and return to play with risk factors including younger age, injury size, bone loss, anchor number, and anchor type. METHODS: A review of 161 shoulders who underwent arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair using modern techniques at minimum 2 year follow up was completed. In addition to surgical data, ASES, stability, ROM, strength, and pain scores were compared pre- and post-operatively as well as return to sport. Those who required revision surgery were identified and compared to those not undergoing revision. RESULTS: Twenty shoulders required revision surgery (12.4%) at 5.3 year follow-up. Significant risk factors included female gender (p = 0.001), dominant shoulder (p = 0.005), and concomitant rotator cuff injury (p = 0.029). Patients with 3 or fewer anchors were more likely to require revision (OR = 3.48). There was no difference after normalization to tear size and location (p > 0.05). Return to sport at the same level was significantly lower if revision surgery was required (15.4% vs. 64.3%) (p = 0.004). All patients had significant improvements in ASES, pain, ROM, and strength after the original surgery, however, those who required revision surgery had less improvement (p < 0.05). Stability improved significantly in non-revision athletes (p < 0.001), but did not in revision patients (p = 0.662). CONCLUSION: Athletes required revision arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair at an incidence of 12.4% and had poorer outcome scores and return to play with risk factors being dominant shoulder surgery, female gender, concomitant rotator cuff injury, and the use of 3 or fewer anchors. This data is essential for patient selection, optimal treatment techniques, and patient education as posterior shoulder instability failure requiring revision has not previously been evaluated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6093987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60939872018-08-20 Incidence and Risk Factors for Failure of Arthroscopic Posterior Capsulolabral Reconstruction Bradley, James P. Arner, Justin W. Jayakumar, Sachidhanand Vyas, Dharmesh Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Risk factors and outcomes of revision arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair is not well defined. It is hypothesized that athletes who require revision arthroscopic posterior unidirectional capsulolabral repair will have poorer outcomes and return to play with risk factors including younger age, injury size, bone loss, anchor number, and anchor type. METHODS: A review of 161 shoulders who underwent arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair using modern techniques at minimum 2 year follow up was completed. In addition to surgical data, ASES, stability, ROM, strength, and pain scores were compared pre- and post-operatively as well as return to sport. Those who required revision surgery were identified and compared to those not undergoing revision. RESULTS: Twenty shoulders required revision surgery (12.4%) at 5.3 year follow-up. Significant risk factors included female gender (p = 0.001), dominant shoulder (p = 0.005), and concomitant rotator cuff injury (p = 0.029). Patients with 3 or fewer anchors were more likely to require revision (OR = 3.48). There was no difference after normalization to tear size and location (p > 0.05). Return to sport at the same level was significantly lower if revision surgery was required (15.4% vs. 64.3%) (p = 0.004). All patients had significant improvements in ASES, pain, ROM, and strength after the original surgery, however, those who required revision surgery had less improvement (p < 0.05). Stability improved significantly in non-revision athletes (p < 0.001), but did not in revision patients (p = 0.662). CONCLUSION: Athletes required revision arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair at an incidence of 12.4% and had poorer outcome scores and return to play with risk factors being dominant shoulder surgery, female gender, concomitant rotator cuff injury, and the use of 3 or fewer anchors. This data is essential for patient selection, optimal treatment techniques, and patient education as posterior shoulder instability failure requiring revision has not previously been evaluated. SAGE Publications 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6093987/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00153 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Bradley, James P.
Arner, Justin W.
Jayakumar, Sachidhanand
Vyas, Dharmesh
Incidence and Risk Factors for Failure of Arthroscopic Posterior Capsulolabral Reconstruction
title Incidence and Risk Factors for Failure of Arthroscopic Posterior Capsulolabral Reconstruction
title_full Incidence and Risk Factors for Failure of Arthroscopic Posterior Capsulolabral Reconstruction
title_fullStr Incidence and Risk Factors for Failure of Arthroscopic Posterior Capsulolabral Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Incidence and Risk Factors for Failure of Arthroscopic Posterior Capsulolabral Reconstruction
title_short Incidence and Risk Factors for Failure of Arthroscopic Posterior Capsulolabral Reconstruction
title_sort incidence and risk factors for failure of arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral reconstruction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6093987/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00153
work_keys_str_mv AT bradleyjamesp incidenceandriskfactorsforfailureofarthroscopicposteriorcapsulolabralreconstruction
AT arnerjustinw incidenceandriskfactorsforfailureofarthroscopicposteriorcapsulolabralreconstruction
AT jayakumarsachidhanand incidenceandriskfactorsforfailureofarthroscopicposteriorcapsulolabralreconstruction
AT vyasdharmesh incidenceandriskfactorsforfailureofarthroscopicposteriorcapsulolabralreconstruction