Cargando…
Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs)
Objective: The aim of this study was to elucidate the long-term results of crossover bypass (CB) for iliac atherosclerotic lesions in the era of endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed. CB was performed in 242 patients between 2003 and 2014 by va...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.18-00007 |
_version_ | 1783347759900786688 |
---|---|
author | Miyama, Noriyuki Komai, Hiroyoshi Nakamura, Takashi Iwahashi, Masahiro Mukobara, Nobuhiko Yoshida, Masato Fujimura, Hironobu Sugimoto, Takaki Asada, Hidenori Tanimura, Nobuhiro Azami, Takashi Kawata, Masatoshi Tsuji, Yoshihiko Wakita, Noboru Ogino, Hitoshi Shindo, Shunya Hatada, Atsutoshi Oka, Takanori |
author_facet | Miyama, Noriyuki Komai, Hiroyoshi Nakamura, Takashi Iwahashi, Masahiro Mukobara, Nobuhiko Yoshida, Masato Fujimura, Hironobu Sugimoto, Takaki Asada, Hidenori Tanimura, Nobuhiro Azami, Takashi Kawata, Masatoshi Tsuji, Yoshihiko Wakita, Noboru Ogino, Hitoshi Shindo, Shunya Hatada, Atsutoshi Oka, Takanori |
author_sort | Miyama, Noriyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: The aim of this study was to elucidate the long-term results of crossover bypass (CB) for iliac atherosclerotic lesions in the era of endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed. CB was performed in 242 patients between 2003 and 2014 by vascular surgeons at multiple medical centers in Japan. Results: Perioperative mortality was 1.7%. Primary patency rates were 86% at 5 years and 82% at 8 years. Univariate analysis showed that critical limb ischemia (Rutherford class 4–6), vein graft, and superficial femoral artery occlusion were significantly associated with low primary patency. In multivariate analysis, only critical limb ischemia influenced primary patency. The secondary patency rate was 87% at both 5 and 8 years. The limb salvage rate was 98% at both 5 and 8 years. The overall survival rates were 71% at 5 years and 49% at 8 years. Conclusion: The long-term results of CB were good in our study, compared with previous reports. Our results suggest that CB remains an option for the arterial reconstruction in unilateral iliac occlusive disease after EVT failed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6094041 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60940412018-08-16 Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs) Miyama, Noriyuki Komai, Hiroyoshi Nakamura, Takashi Iwahashi, Masahiro Mukobara, Nobuhiko Yoshida, Masato Fujimura, Hironobu Sugimoto, Takaki Asada, Hidenori Tanimura, Nobuhiro Azami, Takashi Kawata, Masatoshi Tsuji, Yoshihiko Wakita, Noboru Ogino, Hitoshi Shindo, Shunya Hatada, Atsutoshi Oka, Takanori Ann Vasc Dis Original Article Objective: The aim of this study was to elucidate the long-term results of crossover bypass (CB) for iliac atherosclerotic lesions in the era of endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed. CB was performed in 242 patients between 2003 and 2014 by vascular surgeons at multiple medical centers in Japan. Results: Perioperative mortality was 1.7%. Primary patency rates were 86% at 5 years and 82% at 8 years. Univariate analysis showed that critical limb ischemia (Rutherford class 4–6), vein graft, and superficial femoral artery occlusion were significantly associated with low primary patency. In multivariate analysis, only critical limb ischemia influenced primary patency. The secondary patency rate was 87% at both 5 and 8 years. The limb salvage rate was 98% at both 5 and 8 years. The overall survival rates were 71% at 5 years and 49% at 8 years. Conclusion: The long-term results of CB were good in our study, compared with previous reports. Our results suggest that CB remains an option for the arterial reconstruction in unilateral iliac occlusive disease after EVT failed. Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2018-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6094041/ /pubmed/30116414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.18-00007 Text en Copyright © 2018 Annals of Vascular Diseases http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ ©2018 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the credit of the original work, a link to the license, and indication of any change are properly given, and the original work is not used for commercial purposes. Remixed or transformed contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Miyama, Noriyuki Komai, Hiroyoshi Nakamura, Takashi Iwahashi, Masahiro Mukobara, Nobuhiko Yoshida, Masato Fujimura, Hironobu Sugimoto, Takaki Asada, Hidenori Tanimura, Nobuhiro Azami, Takashi Kawata, Masatoshi Tsuji, Yoshihiko Wakita, Noboru Ogino, Hitoshi Shindo, Shunya Hatada, Atsutoshi Oka, Takanori Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs) |
title | Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs) |
title_full | Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs) |
title_fullStr | Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs) |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs) |
title_short | Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs) |
title_sort | long-term results of crossover bypass for iliac atherosclerotic lesions in the era of endovascular treatment: the re-action study (retrospective assessment of crossover bypass as a treatment for iliac lesions) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.18-00007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miyamanoriyuki longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT komaihiroyoshi longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT nakamuratakashi longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT iwahashimasahiro longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT mukobaranobuhiko longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT yoshidamasato longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT fujimurahironobu longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT sugimototakaki longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT asadahidenori longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT tanimuranobuhiro longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT azamitakashi longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT kawatamasatoshi longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT tsujiyoshihiko longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT wakitanoboru longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT oginohitoshi longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT shindoshunya longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT hatadaatsutoshi longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions AT okatakanori longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions |