Cargando…

Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs)

Objective: The aim of this study was to elucidate the long-term results of crossover bypass (CB) for iliac atherosclerotic lesions in the era of endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed. CB was performed in 242 patients between 2003 and 2014 by va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyama, Noriyuki, Komai, Hiroyoshi, Nakamura, Takashi, Iwahashi, Masahiro, Mukobara, Nobuhiko, Yoshida, Masato, Fujimura, Hironobu, Sugimoto, Takaki, Asada, Hidenori, Tanimura, Nobuhiro, Azami, Takashi, Kawata, Masatoshi, Tsuji, Yoshihiko, Wakita, Noboru, Ogino, Hitoshi, Shindo, Shunya, Hatada, Atsutoshi, Oka, Takanori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116414
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.18-00007
_version_ 1783347759900786688
author Miyama, Noriyuki
Komai, Hiroyoshi
Nakamura, Takashi
Iwahashi, Masahiro
Mukobara, Nobuhiko
Yoshida, Masato
Fujimura, Hironobu
Sugimoto, Takaki
Asada, Hidenori
Tanimura, Nobuhiro
Azami, Takashi
Kawata, Masatoshi
Tsuji, Yoshihiko
Wakita, Noboru
Ogino, Hitoshi
Shindo, Shunya
Hatada, Atsutoshi
Oka, Takanori
author_facet Miyama, Noriyuki
Komai, Hiroyoshi
Nakamura, Takashi
Iwahashi, Masahiro
Mukobara, Nobuhiko
Yoshida, Masato
Fujimura, Hironobu
Sugimoto, Takaki
Asada, Hidenori
Tanimura, Nobuhiro
Azami, Takashi
Kawata, Masatoshi
Tsuji, Yoshihiko
Wakita, Noboru
Ogino, Hitoshi
Shindo, Shunya
Hatada, Atsutoshi
Oka, Takanori
author_sort Miyama, Noriyuki
collection PubMed
description Objective: The aim of this study was to elucidate the long-term results of crossover bypass (CB) for iliac atherosclerotic lesions in the era of endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed. CB was performed in 242 patients between 2003 and 2014 by vascular surgeons at multiple medical centers in Japan. Results: Perioperative mortality was 1.7%. Primary patency rates were 86% at 5 years and 82% at 8 years. Univariate analysis showed that critical limb ischemia (Rutherford class 4–6), vein graft, and superficial femoral artery occlusion were significantly associated with low primary patency. In multivariate analysis, only critical limb ischemia influenced primary patency. The secondary patency rate was 87% at both 5 and 8 years. The limb salvage rate was 98% at both 5 and 8 years. The overall survival rates were 71% at 5 years and 49% at 8 years. Conclusion: The long-term results of CB were good in our study, compared with previous reports. Our results suggest that CB remains an option for the arterial reconstruction in unilateral iliac occlusive disease after EVT failed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6094041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60940412018-08-16 Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs) Miyama, Noriyuki Komai, Hiroyoshi Nakamura, Takashi Iwahashi, Masahiro Mukobara, Nobuhiko Yoshida, Masato Fujimura, Hironobu Sugimoto, Takaki Asada, Hidenori Tanimura, Nobuhiro Azami, Takashi Kawata, Masatoshi Tsuji, Yoshihiko Wakita, Noboru Ogino, Hitoshi Shindo, Shunya Hatada, Atsutoshi Oka, Takanori Ann Vasc Dis Original Article Objective: The aim of this study was to elucidate the long-term results of crossover bypass (CB) for iliac atherosclerotic lesions in the era of endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed. CB was performed in 242 patients between 2003 and 2014 by vascular surgeons at multiple medical centers in Japan. Results: Perioperative mortality was 1.7%. Primary patency rates were 86% at 5 years and 82% at 8 years. Univariate analysis showed that critical limb ischemia (Rutherford class 4–6), vein graft, and superficial femoral artery occlusion were significantly associated with low primary patency. In multivariate analysis, only critical limb ischemia influenced primary patency. The secondary patency rate was 87% at both 5 and 8 years. The limb salvage rate was 98% at both 5 and 8 years. The overall survival rates were 71% at 5 years and 49% at 8 years. Conclusion: The long-term results of CB were good in our study, compared with previous reports. Our results suggest that CB remains an option for the arterial reconstruction in unilateral iliac occlusive disease after EVT failed. Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2018-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6094041/ /pubmed/30116414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.18-00007 Text en Copyright © 2018 Annals of Vascular Diseases http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ ©2018 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the credit of the original work, a link to the license, and indication of any change are properly given, and the original work is not used for commercial purposes. Remixed or transformed contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
spellingShingle Original Article
Miyama, Noriyuki
Komai, Hiroyoshi
Nakamura, Takashi
Iwahashi, Masahiro
Mukobara, Nobuhiko
Yoshida, Masato
Fujimura, Hironobu
Sugimoto, Takaki
Asada, Hidenori
Tanimura, Nobuhiro
Azami, Takashi
Kawata, Masatoshi
Tsuji, Yoshihiko
Wakita, Noboru
Ogino, Hitoshi
Shindo, Shunya
Hatada, Atsutoshi
Oka, Takanori
Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs)
title Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs)
title_full Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs)
title_fullStr Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs)
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs)
title_short Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs)
title_sort long-term results of crossover bypass for iliac atherosclerotic lesions in the era of endovascular treatment: the re-action study (retrospective assessment of crossover bypass as a treatment for iliac lesions)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116414
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.18-00007
work_keys_str_mv AT miyamanoriyuki longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT komaihiroyoshi longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT nakamuratakashi longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT iwahashimasahiro longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT mukobaranobuhiko longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT yoshidamasato longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT fujimurahironobu longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT sugimototakaki longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT asadahidenori longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT tanimuranobuhiro longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT azamitakashi longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT kawatamasatoshi longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT tsujiyoshihiko longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT wakitanoboru longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT oginohitoshi longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT shindoshunya longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT hatadaatsutoshi longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions
AT okatakanori longtermresultsofcrossoverbypassforiliacatheroscleroticlesionsintheeraofendovasculartreatmentthereactionstudyretrospectiveassessmentofcrossoverbypassasatreatmentforiliaclesions