Cargando…

Comparison of crowd-sourced, electronic health records based, and traditional health-care based influenza-tracking systems at multiple spatial resolutions in the United States of America

BACKGROUND: Influenza causes an estimated 3000 to 50,000 deaths per year in the United States of America (US). Timely and representative data can help local, state, and national public health officials monitor and respond to outbreaks of seasonal influenza. Data from cloud-based electronic health re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baltrusaitis, Kristin, Brownstein, John S., Scarpino, Samuel V., Bakota, Eric, Crawley, Adam W., Conidi, Giuseppe, Gunn, Julia, Gray, Josh, Zink, Anna, Santillana, Mauricio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3322-3
_version_ 1783347819507089408
author Baltrusaitis, Kristin
Brownstein, John S.
Scarpino, Samuel V.
Bakota, Eric
Crawley, Adam W.
Conidi, Giuseppe
Gunn, Julia
Gray, Josh
Zink, Anna
Santillana, Mauricio
author_facet Baltrusaitis, Kristin
Brownstein, John S.
Scarpino, Samuel V.
Bakota, Eric
Crawley, Adam W.
Conidi, Giuseppe
Gunn, Julia
Gray, Josh
Zink, Anna
Santillana, Mauricio
author_sort Baltrusaitis, Kristin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Influenza causes an estimated 3000 to 50,000 deaths per year in the United States of America (US). Timely and representative data can help local, state, and national public health officials monitor and respond to outbreaks of seasonal influenza. Data from cloud-based electronic health records (EHR) and crowd-sourced influenza surveillance systems have the potential to provide complementary, near real-time estimates of influenza activity. The objectives of this paper are to compare two novel influenza-tracking systems with three traditional healthcare-based influenza surveillance systems at four spatial resolutions: national, regional, state, and city, and to determine the minimum number of participants in these systems required to produce influenza activity estimates that resemble the historical trends recorded by traditional surveillance systems. METHODS: We compared influenza activity estimates from five influenza surveillance systems: 1) patient visits for influenza-like illness (ILI) from the US Outpatient ILI Surveillance Network (ILINet), 2) virologic data from World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating and National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS) Laboratories, 3) Emergency Department (ED) syndromic surveillance from Boston, Massachusetts, 4) patient visits for ILI from EHR, and 5) reports of ILI from the crowd-sourced system, Flu Near You (FNY), by calculating correlations between these systems across four influenza seasons, 2012–16, at four different spatial resolutions in the US. For the crowd-sourced system, we also used a bootstrapping statistical approach to estimate the minimum number of reports necessary to produce a meaningful signal at a given spatial resolution. RESULTS: In general, as the spatial resolution increased, correlation values between all influenza surveillance systems decreased. Influenza-like Illness rates in geographic areas with more than 250 crowd-sourced participants or with more than 20,000 visit counts for EHR tracked government-lead estimates of influenza activity. CONCLUSIONS: With a sufficient number of reports, data from novel influenza surveillance systems can complement traditional healthcare-based systems at multiple spatial resolutions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-018-3322-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6094455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60944552018-08-20 Comparison of crowd-sourced, electronic health records based, and traditional health-care based influenza-tracking systems at multiple spatial resolutions in the United States of America Baltrusaitis, Kristin Brownstein, John S. Scarpino, Samuel V. Bakota, Eric Crawley, Adam W. Conidi, Giuseppe Gunn, Julia Gray, Josh Zink, Anna Santillana, Mauricio BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Influenza causes an estimated 3000 to 50,000 deaths per year in the United States of America (US). Timely and representative data can help local, state, and national public health officials monitor and respond to outbreaks of seasonal influenza. Data from cloud-based electronic health records (EHR) and crowd-sourced influenza surveillance systems have the potential to provide complementary, near real-time estimates of influenza activity. The objectives of this paper are to compare two novel influenza-tracking systems with three traditional healthcare-based influenza surveillance systems at four spatial resolutions: national, regional, state, and city, and to determine the minimum number of participants in these systems required to produce influenza activity estimates that resemble the historical trends recorded by traditional surveillance systems. METHODS: We compared influenza activity estimates from five influenza surveillance systems: 1) patient visits for influenza-like illness (ILI) from the US Outpatient ILI Surveillance Network (ILINet), 2) virologic data from World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating and National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS) Laboratories, 3) Emergency Department (ED) syndromic surveillance from Boston, Massachusetts, 4) patient visits for ILI from EHR, and 5) reports of ILI from the crowd-sourced system, Flu Near You (FNY), by calculating correlations between these systems across four influenza seasons, 2012–16, at four different spatial resolutions in the US. For the crowd-sourced system, we also used a bootstrapping statistical approach to estimate the minimum number of reports necessary to produce a meaningful signal at a given spatial resolution. RESULTS: In general, as the spatial resolution increased, correlation values between all influenza surveillance systems decreased. Influenza-like Illness rates in geographic areas with more than 250 crowd-sourced participants or with more than 20,000 visit counts for EHR tracked government-lead estimates of influenza activity. CONCLUSIONS: With a sufficient number of reports, data from novel influenza surveillance systems can complement traditional healthcare-based systems at multiple spatial resolutions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-018-3322-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6094455/ /pubmed/30111305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3322-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baltrusaitis, Kristin
Brownstein, John S.
Scarpino, Samuel V.
Bakota, Eric
Crawley, Adam W.
Conidi, Giuseppe
Gunn, Julia
Gray, Josh
Zink, Anna
Santillana, Mauricio
Comparison of crowd-sourced, electronic health records based, and traditional health-care based influenza-tracking systems at multiple spatial resolutions in the United States of America
title Comparison of crowd-sourced, electronic health records based, and traditional health-care based influenza-tracking systems at multiple spatial resolutions in the United States of America
title_full Comparison of crowd-sourced, electronic health records based, and traditional health-care based influenza-tracking systems at multiple spatial resolutions in the United States of America
title_fullStr Comparison of crowd-sourced, electronic health records based, and traditional health-care based influenza-tracking systems at multiple spatial resolutions in the United States of America
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of crowd-sourced, electronic health records based, and traditional health-care based influenza-tracking systems at multiple spatial resolutions in the United States of America
title_short Comparison of crowd-sourced, electronic health records based, and traditional health-care based influenza-tracking systems at multiple spatial resolutions in the United States of America
title_sort comparison of crowd-sourced, electronic health records based, and traditional health-care based influenza-tracking systems at multiple spatial resolutions in the united states of america
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3322-3
work_keys_str_mv AT baltrusaitiskristin comparisonofcrowdsourcedelectronichealthrecordsbasedandtraditionalhealthcarebasedinfluenzatrackingsystemsatmultiplespatialresolutionsintheunitedstatesofamerica
AT brownsteinjohns comparisonofcrowdsourcedelectronichealthrecordsbasedandtraditionalhealthcarebasedinfluenzatrackingsystemsatmultiplespatialresolutionsintheunitedstatesofamerica
AT scarpinosamuelv comparisonofcrowdsourcedelectronichealthrecordsbasedandtraditionalhealthcarebasedinfluenzatrackingsystemsatmultiplespatialresolutionsintheunitedstatesofamerica
AT bakotaeric comparisonofcrowdsourcedelectronichealthrecordsbasedandtraditionalhealthcarebasedinfluenzatrackingsystemsatmultiplespatialresolutionsintheunitedstatesofamerica
AT crawleyadamw comparisonofcrowdsourcedelectronichealthrecordsbasedandtraditionalhealthcarebasedinfluenzatrackingsystemsatmultiplespatialresolutionsintheunitedstatesofamerica
AT conidigiuseppe comparisonofcrowdsourcedelectronichealthrecordsbasedandtraditionalhealthcarebasedinfluenzatrackingsystemsatmultiplespatialresolutionsintheunitedstatesofamerica
AT gunnjulia comparisonofcrowdsourcedelectronichealthrecordsbasedandtraditionalhealthcarebasedinfluenzatrackingsystemsatmultiplespatialresolutionsintheunitedstatesofamerica
AT grayjosh comparisonofcrowdsourcedelectronichealthrecordsbasedandtraditionalhealthcarebasedinfluenzatrackingsystemsatmultiplespatialresolutionsintheunitedstatesofamerica
AT zinkanna comparisonofcrowdsourcedelectronichealthrecordsbasedandtraditionalhealthcarebasedinfluenzatrackingsystemsatmultiplespatialresolutionsintheunitedstatesofamerica
AT santillanamauricio comparisonofcrowdsourcedelectronichealthrecordsbasedandtraditionalhealthcarebasedinfluenzatrackingsystemsatmultiplespatialresolutionsintheunitedstatesofamerica