Cargando…

Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of lipegfilgrastim with pegfilgrastim and filgrastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related events

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors are effective at reducing the risk and duration of neutropenia. The current meta-analysis compared the neutropenia-related efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim to those of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim. METHODS: Embase was searched for trials exami...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bond, T Christopher, Szabo, Erika, Gabriel, Susan, Klastersky, Jean, Tomey, Omar, Mueller, Udo, Schwartzberg, Lee, Tang, Boxiong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28614980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1078155217714859
_version_ 1783347829596487680
author Bond, T Christopher
Szabo, Erika
Gabriel, Susan
Klastersky, Jean
Tomey, Omar
Mueller, Udo
Schwartzberg, Lee
Tang, Boxiong
author_facet Bond, T Christopher
Szabo, Erika
Gabriel, Susan
Klastersky, Jean
Tomey, Omar
Mueller, Udo
Schwartzberg, Lee
Tang, Boxiong
author_sort Bond, T Christopher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors are effective at reducing the risk and duration of neutropenia. The current meta-analysis compared the neutropenia-related efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim to those of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim. METHODS: Embase was searched for trials examining the efficacy/safety of lipegfilgrastim, pegfilgrastim, or filgrastim. Outcomes included febrile neutropenia, severe neutropenia, duration of severe neutropenia, time to recovery of absolute neutrophil count, and incidence of bone pain. Direct comparisons were made using random-effects models. No trials directly compared lipegfilgrastim and filgrastim. Indirect comparisons were made between lipegfilgrastim and filgrastim with pegfilgrastim as the common comparator. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included a total of 5769 patients from 24 studies. Over all cycles, lipegfilgrastim showed a lower, nonsignificant risk of febrile neutropenia compared with pegfilgrastim. Lipegfilgrastim has a lower risk of febrile neutropenia versus filgrastim but was also not statistically significant. The risk ratio for severe neutropenia in cycle 1 was 0.80, a 20% reduction in favor of lipegfilgrastim. For cycles 2–4, the risk ratio was 0.53 (0.35, 0.79) for lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim. The risk of severe neutropenia in cycles 2–4 was also significantly lower for lipegfilgrastim (risk ratio 0.45, 0.27, 0.75, respectively). No significant differences were found for febrile neutropenia and severe neutropenia in cycle 1. However, in cycles 2–4, lipegfilgrastim was associated with significant and clinically meaningful reductions in risk of severe neutropenia versus either pegfilgrastim or filgrastim. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with pegfilgrastim or filgrastim, lipegfilgrastim has a statistically significantly lower absolute neutrophil count recovery time; however, differences in duration of severe neutropenia and bone pain were nonsignificant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6094503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60945032018-08-28 Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of lipegfilgrastim with pegfilgrastim and filgrastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related events Bond, T Christopher Szabo, Erika Gabriel, Susan Klastersky, Jean Tomey, Omar Mueller, Udo Schwartzberg, Lee Tang, Boxiong J Oncol Pharm Pract Original Articles BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors are effective at reducing the risk and duration of neutropenia. The current meta-analysis compared the neutropenia-related efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim to those of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim. METHODS: Embase was searched for trials examining the efficacy/safety of lipegfilgrastim, pegfilgrastim, or filgrastim. Outcomes included febrile neutropenia, severe neutropenia, duration of severe neutropenia, time to recovery of absolute neutrophil count, and incidence of bone pain. Direct comparisons were made using random-effects models. No trials directly compared lipegfilgrastim and filgrastim. Indirect comparisons were made between lipegfilgrastim and filgrastim with pegfilgrastim as the common comparator. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included a total of 5769 patients from 24 studies. Over all cycles, lipegfilgrastim showed a lower, nonsignificant risk of febrile neutropenia compared with pegfilgrastim. Lipegfilgrastim has a lower risk of febrile neutropenia versus filgrastim but was also not statistically significant. The risk ratio for severe neutropenia in cycle 1 was 0.80, a 20% reduction in favor of lipegfilgrastim. For cycles 2–4, the risk ratio was 0.53 (0.35, 0.79) for lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim. The risk of severe neutropenia in cycles 2–4 was also significantly lower for lipegfilgrastim (risk ratio 0.45, 0.27, 0.75, respectively). No significant differences were found for febrile neutropenia and severe neutropenia in cycle 1. However, in cycles 2–4, lipegfilgrastim was associated with significant and clinically meaningful reductions in risk of severe neutropenia versus either pegfilgrastim or filgrastim. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with pegfilgrastim or filgrastim, lipegfilgrastim has a statistically significantly lower absolute neutrophil count recovery time; however, differences in duration of severe neutropenia and bone pain were nonsignificant. SAGE Publications 2017-06-14 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6094503/ /pubmed/28614980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1078155217714859 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bond, T Christopher
Szabo, Erika
Gabriel, Susan
Klastersky, Jean
Tomey, Omar
Mueller, Udo
Schwartzberg, Lee
Tang, Boxiong
Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of lipegfilgrastim with pegfilgrastim and filgrastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related events
title Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of lipegfilgrastim with pegfilgrastim and filgrastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related events
title_full Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of lipegfilgrastim with pegfilgrastim and filgrastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related events
title_fullStr Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of lipegfilgrastim with pegfilgrastim and filgrastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related events
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of lipegfilgrastim with pegfilgrastim and filgrastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related events
title_short Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of lipegfilgrastim with pegfilgrastim and filgrastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related events
title_sort meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of lipegfilgrastim with pegfilgrastim and filgrastim for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related events
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28614980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1078155217714859
work_keys_str_mv AT bondtchristopher metaanalysisandindirecttreatmentcomparisonoflipegfilgrastimwithpegfilgrastimandfilgrastimforthereductionofchemotherapyinducedneutropeniarelatedevents
AT szaboerika metaanalysisandindirecttreatmentcomparisonoflipegfilgrastimwithpegfilgrastimandfilgrastimforthereductionofchemotherapyinducedneutropeniarelatedevents
AT gabrielsusan metaanalysisandindirecttreatmentcomparisonoflipegfilgrastimwithpegfilgrastimandfilgrastimforthereductionofchemotherapyinducedneutropeniarelatedevents
AT klasterskyjean metaanalysisandindirecttreatmentcomparisonoflipegfilgrastimwithpegfilgrastimandfilgrastimforthereductionofchemotherapyinducedneutropeniarelatedevents
AT tomeyomar metaanalysisandindirecttreatmentcomparisonoflipegfilgrastimwithpegfilgrastimandfilgrastimforthereductionofchemotherapyinducedneutropeniarelatedevents
AT muellerudo metaanalysisandindirecttreatmentcomparisonoflipegfilgrastimwithpegfilgrastimandfilgrastimforthereductionofchemotherapyinducedneutropeniarelatedevents
AT schwartzberglee metaanalysisandindirecttreatmentcomparisonoflipegfilgrastimwithpegfilgrastimandfilgrastimforthereductionofchemotherapyinducedneutropeniarelatedevents
AT tangboxiong metaanalysisandindirecttreatmentcomparisonoflipegfilgrastimwithpegfilgrastimandfilgrastimforthereductionofchemotherapyinducedneutropeniarelatedevents