Cargando…

A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program

BACKGROUND: Recent developments in assisted reproductive technology focus on potential advances to improve its success rate. Atosiban, a combined oxytocin/vasopressin V1a receptor antagonist, is a novel class of drug involved in basic priming of the uterus for successful implantation during embryo t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mishra, Vineet, Agarwal, Himani, Goel, Sugandha, Roy, Priyankur, Choudhary, Sumesh, Lamba, Sunita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158812
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_7_17
_version_ 1783347837244801024
author Mishra, Vineet
Agarwal, Himani
Goel, Sugandha
Roy, Priyankur
Choudhary, Sumesh
Lamba, Sunita
author_facet Mishra, Vineet
Agarwal, Himani
Goel, Sugandha
Roy, Priyankur
Choudhary, Sumesh
Lamba, Sunita
author_sort Mishra, Vineet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent developments in assisted reproductive technology focus on potential advances to improve its success rate. Atosiban, a combined oxytocin/vasopressin V1a receptor antagonist, is a novel class of drug involved in basic priming of the uterus for successful implantation during embryo transfer (ET). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of atosiban (study group) in ET patients in comparison to placebo (control group) regarding implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and ongoing pregnancy rate and to assess the safety profile of atosiban. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 320 women undergoing in vitro fertilization-ET at a tertiary care hospital were enrolled in the study. In the study group, atosiban was given as initial intravenous (IV) bolus injection 0.9 ml (6.75 mg), 30 min before ET followed by continuous IV infusion of atosiban. In the control group, placebo (normal saline) was infused at the same rate and dose. Pregnancy was confirmed 14 days after ET by β-human chronic gonadotropin level. IR and CPR were determined by doing transvaginal sonography 3 weeks and 6 weeks postET, respectively. RESULTS: In women with atosiban treatment, the positive pregnancy rate and CPRs were 41.25% and 36.25%, respectively. The IR per embryo transferred was 17.5%. No major side effects of atosiban were noted among enlisted patients. The miscarriage rate and ectopic pregnancy rate were low (12.12% and 4.54%, respectively). Forty-two women had singleton gestation, while twin and triplet pregnancies were encountered in 13 and 3 women, respectively. No congenital anomalies were observed during an antenatal scan at 18–20 weeks in ongoing pregnancies. The positive pregnancy rate, the CPR, and the IR in the control group was 35%, 30%, and 16.5%, respectively, which was significantly lower than the atosiban group. CONCLUSION: Atosiban reduces uterine contractions and increases endomyometrial perfusion, both of which have potential benefits regarding improved IRs, CPR, and ongoing pregnancy rates. Atosiban has a good embryonic safety profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6094537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60945372018-08-29 A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program Mishra, Vineet Agarwal, Himani Goel, Sugandha Roy, Priyankur Choudhary, Sumesh Lamba, Sunita J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Recent developments in assisted reproductive technology focus on potential advances to improve its success rate. Atosiban, a combined oxytocin/vasopressin V1a receptor antagonist, is a novel class of drug involved in basic priming of the uterus for successful implantation during embryo transfer (ET). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of atosiban (study group) in ET patients in comparison to placebo (control group) regarding implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and ongoing pregnancy rate and to assess the safety profile of atosiban. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 320 women undergoing in vitro fertilization-ET at a tertiary care hospital were enrolled in the study. In the study group, atosiban was given as initial intravenous (IV) bolus injection 0.9 ml (6.75 mg), 30 min before ET followed by continuous IV infusion of atosiban. In the control group, placebo (normal saline) was infused at the same rate and dose. Pregnancy was confirmed 14 days after ET by β-human chronic gonadotropin level. IR and CPR were determined by doing transvaginal sonography 3 weeks and 6 weeks postET, respectively. RESULTS: In women with atosiban treatment, the positive pregnancy rate and CPRs were 41.25% and 36.25%, respectively. The IR per embryo transferred was 17.5%. No major side effects of atosiban were noted among enlisted patients. The miscarriage rate and ectopic pregnancy rate were low (12.12% and 4.54%, respectively). Forty-two women had singleton gestation, while twin and triplet pregnancies were encountered in 13 and 3 women, respectively. No congenital anomalies were observed during an antenatal scan at 18–20 weeks in ongoing pregnancies. The positive pregnancy rate, the CPR, and the IR in the control group was 35%, 30%, and 16.5%, respectively, which was significantly lower than the atosiban group. CONCLUSION: Atosiban reduces uterine contractions and increases endomyometrial perfusion, both of which have potential benefits regarding improved IRs, CPR, and ongoing pregnancy rates. Atosiban has a good embryonic safety profile. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6094537/ /pubmed/30158812 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_7_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mishra, Vineet
Agarwal, Himani
Goel, Sugandha
Roy, Priyankur
Choudhary, Sumesh
Lamba, Sunita
A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program
title A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program
title_full A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program
title_fullStr A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program
title_short A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program
title_sort prospective case–control trial to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of atosiban versus placebo in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158812
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_7_17
work_keys_str_mv AT mishravineet aprospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram
AT agarwalhimani aprospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram
AT goelsugandha aprospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram
AT roypriyankur aprospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram
AT choudharysumesh aprospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram
AT lambasunita aprospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram
AT mishravineet prospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram
AT agarwalhimani prospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram
AT goelsugandha prospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram
AT roypriyankur prospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram
AT choudharysumesh prospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram
AT lambasunita prospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram