Cargando…
A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program
BACKGROUND: Recent developments in assisted reproductive technology focus on potential advances to improve its success rate. Atosiban, a combined oxytocin/vasopressin V1a receptor antagonist, is a novel class of drug involved in basic priming of the uterus for successful implantation during embryo t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158812 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_7_17 |
_version_ | 1783347837244801024 |
---|---|
author | Mishra, Vineet Agarwal, Himani Goel, Sugandha Roy, Priyankur Choudhary, Sumesh Lamba, Sunita |
author_facet | Mishra, Vineet Agarwal, Himani Goel, Sugandha Roy, Priyankur Choudhary, Sumesh Lamba, Sunita |
author_sort | Mishra, Vineet |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recent developments in assisted reproductive technology focus on potential advances to improve its success rate. Atosiban, a combined oxytocin/vasopressin V1a receptor antagonist, is a novel class of drug involved in basic priming of the uterus for successful implantation during embryo transfer (ET). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of atosiban (study group) in ET patients in comparison to placebo (control group) regarding implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and ongoing pregnancy rate and to assess the safety profile of atosiban. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 320 women undergoing in vitro fertilization-ET at a tertiary care hospital were enrolled in the study. In the study group, atosiban was given as initial intravenous (IV) bolus injection 0.9 ml (6.75 mg), 30 min before ET followed by continuous IV infusion of atosiban. In the control group, placebo (normal saline) was infused at the same rate and dose. Pregnancy was confirmed 14 days after ET by β-human chronic gonadotropin level. IR and CPR were determined by doing transvaginal sonography 3 weeks and 6 weeks postET, respectively. RESULTS: In women with atosiban treatment, the positive pregnancy rate and CPRs were 41.25% and 36.25%, respectively. The IR per embryo transferred was 17.5%. No major side effects of atosiban were noted among enlisted patients. The miscarriage rate and ectopic pregnancy rate were low (12.12% and 4.54%, respectively). Forty-two women had singleton gestation, while twin and triplet pregnancies were encountered in 13 and 3 women, respectively. No congenital anomalies were observed during an antenatal scan at 18–20 weeks in ongoing pregnancies. The positive pregnancy rate, the CPR, and the IR in the control group was 35%, 30%, and 16.5%, respectively, which was significantly lower than the atosiban group. CONCLUSION: Atosiban reduces uterine contractions and increases endomyometrial perfusion, both of which have potential benefits regarding improved IRs, CPR, and ongoing pregnancy rates. Atosiban has a good embryonic safety profile. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6094537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60945372018-08-29 A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program Mishra, Vineet Agarwal, Himani Goel, Sugandha Roy, Priyankur Choudhary, Sumesh Lamba, Sunita J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Recent developments in assisted reproductive technology focus on potential advances to improve its success rate. Atosiban, a combined oxytocin/vasopressin V1a receptor antagonist, is a novel class of drug involved in basic priming of the uterus for successful implantation during embryo transfer (ET). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of atosiban (study group) in ET patients in comparison to placebo (control group) regarding implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and ongoing pregnancy rate and to assess the safety profile of atosiban. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 320 women undergoing in vitro fertilization-ET at a tertiary care hospital were enrolled in the study. In the study group, atosiban was given as initial intravenous (IV) bolus injection 0.9 ml (6.75 mg), 30 min before ET followed by continuous IV infusion of atosiban. In the control group, placebo (normal saline) was infused at the same rate and dose. Pregnancy was confirmed 14 days after ET by β-human chronic gonadotropin level. IR and CPR were determined by doing transvaginal sonography 3 weeks and 6 weeks postET, respectively. RESULTS: In women with atosiban treatment, the positive pregnancy rate and CPRs were 41.25% and 36.25%, respectively. The IR per embryo transferred was 17.5%. No major side effects of atosiban were noted among enlisted patients. The miscarriage rate and ectopic pregnancy rate were low (12.12% and 4.54%, respectively). Forty-two women had singleton gestation, while twin and triplet pregnancies were encountered in 13 and 3 women, respectively. No congenital anomalies were observed during an antenatal scan at 18–20 weeks in ongoing pregnancies. The positive pregnancy rate, the CPR, and the IR in the control group was 35%, 30%, and 16.5%, respectively, which was significantly lower than the atosiban group. CONCLUSION: Atosiban reduces uterine contractions and increases endomyometrial perfusion, both of which have potential benefits regarding improved IRs, CPR, and ongoing pregnancy rates. Atosiban has a good embryonic safety profile. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6094537/ /pubmed/30158812 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_7_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mishra, Vineet Agarwal, Himani Goel, Sugandha Roy, Priyankur Choudhary, Sumesh Lamba, Sunita A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program |
title | A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program |
title_full | A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program |
title_fullStr | A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program |
title_full_unstemmed | A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program |
title_short | A Prospective Case–control Trial to Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Atosiban versus Placebo in In vitro Fertilization-embryo Transfer Program |
title_sort | prospective case–control trial to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of atosiban versus placebo in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158812 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_7_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mishravineet aprospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram AT agarwalhimani aprospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram AT goelsugandha aprospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram AT roypriyankur aprospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram AT choudharysumesh aprospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram AT lambasunita aprospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram AT mishravineet prospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram AT agarwalhimani prospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram AT goelsugandha prospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram AT roypriyankur prospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram AT choudharysumesh prospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram AT lambasunita prospectivecasecontroltrialtoevaluateandcomparetheefficacyandsafetyofatosibanversusplaceboininvitrofertilizationembryotransferprogram |