Cargando…
Adjuvant chemotherapy does not benefit patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: The clinical data of patients with ESCC treated with chemoradiotherapy with or withou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1086-y |
_version_ | 1783347841820786688 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Mingqiu Shen, Minmin Lin, Yu Liu, Pingping Liu, Xiaohong Li, Xiqing Li, Anchuan Yang, Rongqiang Ni, Wei Zhou, Xin Zhang, Lurong Xu, Benhua Lin, Jianhua Chen, Junqiang Tian, Ye |
author_facet | Chen, Mingqiu Shen, Minmin Lin, Yu Liu, Pingping Liu, Xiaohong Li, Xiqing Li, Anchuan Yang, Rongqiang Ni, Wei Zhou, Xin Zhang, Lurong Xu, Benhua Lin, Jianhua Chen, Junqiang Tian, Ye |
author_sort | Chen, Mingqiu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: The clinical data of patients with ESCC treated with chemoradiotherapy with or without AC were collected and retrospectively reviewed. The overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS) and distant failure-free survival (DFFS) rates were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 98 of whom were treated with CRT-alone, while 89 were treated with CRT-AC. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the CRT-alone and CRT-AC groups, with the exception of sex and the number of cycles of concurrent chemotherapy. Following CRT, 50 patients achieved complete response (CR), 67 had partial response (PR), 63 patients maintained stable disease (SD) and 7 developed progression of disease (PD). The OS, LFFS and DFFS at 1, 2 and 5 years for the entire cohort were 67.5, 41.4 and 27.2%; 68.7, 57.9 and 52.4%; and 78.5, 68.9 and 63.9%, respectively. The clinical N-stage, M-stage, and short-term response to CRT were identified as significant factors that influenced patient prognosis. No significant differences in OS, LFFS or DFFS were observed between the CRT-alone and CRT-AC groups for the entire cohort and for clinical N-stage, clinical M-stage and short-term response subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term response to CRT and the tumor clinical stage were significant prognosis factors for patients with ESCC treated with CRT. With current chemotherapy regimens, AC did not improve survival for patients with ESCC treated with CRT. The retrospective nature of the current study serves as a limitation; thus, further clinical trials are required to evaluate the efficacy of AC in patients with ESCC treated with CRT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6094556 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60945562018-08-24 Adjuvant chemotherapy does not benefit patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy Chen, Mingqiu Shen, Minmin Lin, Yu Liu, Pingping Liu, Xiaohong Li, Xiqing Li, Anchuan Yang, Rongqiang Ni, Wei Zhou, Xin Zhang, Lurong Xu, Benhua Lin, Jianhua Chen, Junqiang Tian, Ye Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: The clinical data of patients with ESCC treated with chemoradiotherapy with or without AC were collected and retrospectively reviewed. The overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS) and distant failure-free survival (DFFS) rates were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 98 of whom were treated with CRT-alone, while 89 were treated with CRT-AC. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the CRT-alone and CRT-AC groups, with the exception of sex and the number of cycles of concurrent chemotherapy. Following CRT, 50 patients achieved complete response (CR), 67 had partial response (PR), 63 patients maintained stable disease (SD) and 7 developed progression of disease (PD). The OS, LFFS and DFFS at 1, 2 and 5 years for the entire cohort were 67.5, 41.4 and 27.2%; 68.7, 57.9 and 52.4%; and 78.5, 68.9 and 63.9%, respectively. The clinical N-stage, M-stage, and short-term response to CRT were identified as significant factors that influenced patient prognosis. No significant differences in OS, LFFS or DFFS were observed between the CRT-alone and CRT-AC groups for the entire cohort and for clinical N-stage, clinical M-stage and short-term response subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term response to CRT and the tumor clinical stage were significant prognosis factors for patients with ESCC treated with CRT. With current chemotherapy regimens, AC did not improve survival for patients with ESCC treated with CRT. The retrospective nature of the current study serves as a limitation; thus, further clinical trials are required to evaluate the efficacy of AC in patients with ESCC treated with CRT. BioMed Central 2018-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6094556/ /pubmed/30111361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1086-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Chen, Mingqiu Shen, Minmin Lin, Yu Liu, Pingping Liu, Xiaohong Li, Xiqing Li, Anchuan Yang, Rongqiang Ni, Wei Zhou, Xin Zhang, Lurong Xu, Benhua Lin, Jianhua Chen, Junqiang Tian, Ye Adjuvant chemotherapy does not benefit patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy |
title | Adjuvant chemotherapy does not benefit patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy |
title_full | Adjuvant chemotherapy does not benefit patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Adjuvant chemotherapy does not benefit patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Adjuvant chemotherapy does not benefit patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy |
title_short | Adjuvant chemotherapy does not benefit patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy |
title_sort | adjuvant chemotherapy does not benefit patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1086-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenmingqiu adjuvantchemotherapydoesnotbenefitpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomatreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT shenminmin adjuvantchemotherapydoesnotbenefitpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomatreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT linyu adjuvantchemotherapydoesnotbenefitpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomatreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT liupingping adjuvantchemotherapydoesnotbenefitpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomatreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT liuxiaohong adjuvantchemotherapydoesnotbenefitpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomatreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT lixiqing adjuvantchemotherapydoesnotbenefitpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomatreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT lianchuan adjuvantchemotherapydoesnotbenefitpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomatreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT yangrongqiang adjuvantchemotherapydoesnotbenefitpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomatreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT niwei adjuvantchemotherapydoesnotbenefitpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomatreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT zhouxin adjuvantchemotherapydoesnotbenefitpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomatreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT zhanglurong adjuvantchemotherapydoesnotbenefitpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomatreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT xubenhua adjuvantchemotherapydoesnotbenefitpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomatreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT linjianhua adjuvantchemotherapydoesnotbenefitpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomatreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT chenjunqiang adjuvantchemotherapydoesnotbenefitpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomatreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy AT tianye adjuvantchemotherapydoesnotbenefitpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomatreatedwithdefinitivechemoradiotherapy |