Cargando…

Learning from the emergence of NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs): a systematic review of evaluations

BACKGROUND: Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs) were funded by NIHR in England in 2008 and 2014 as partnerships between universities and surrounding health service organisations, focused on improving the quality of healthcare through the conduct and applicatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kislov, Roman, Wilson, Paul M., Knowles, Sarah, Boaden, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0805-y
_version_ 1783347844187422720
author Kislov, Roman
Wilson, Paul M.
Knowles, Sarah
Boaden, Ruth
author_facet Kislov, Roman
Wilson, Paul M.
Knowles, Sarah
Boaden, Ruth
author_sort Kislov, Roman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs) were funded by NIHR in England in 2008 and 2014 as partnerships between universities and surrounding health service organisations, focused on improving the quality of healthcare through the conduct and application of applied health research. The aim of this review is to synthesise learning from evaluations of the CLAHRCs. METHODS: Fifteen databases including CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO were searched to identify any evaluations of CLAHRCs. Current and archived CLAHRC websites and the reference lists of retrieved articles were scanned to identify any additional evaluations. Searches were restricted to English language only. Any publications from evaluations of the CLAHRCs were eligible for inclusion if they fulfilled at least one of three pre-specified inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis was undertaken. RESULTS: Twenty-six evaluations (reported in 37 papers) were deemed eligible for inclusion. Evaluations focused on describing and exploring the formative partnerships, vision, values, structures and processes of CLAHRCs; the nature and role of boundaries; the deployment of knowledge brokers and hybrid roles to support knowledge mobilisation; patient and public involvement; and capacity building. The relative lack of data about the early impact of CLAHRCs on health care provision or outcomes is notable. CONCLUSIONS: Much of the evaluative focus on CLAHRCs has been on how they have been organised and on the development of theory around their emergent properties. Evidence is lacking on the impact of CLAHRCs particularly in relation to the knowledge mobilisation processes and practices adopted. Further evaluation of CLAHRCs and other similar research and practice partnerships is warranted and should focus on which knowledge mobilisation approaches work where, how and why. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42016042945). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-018-0805-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6094566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60945662018-08-24 Learning from the emergence of NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs): a systematic review of evaluations Kislov, Roman Wilson, Paul M. Knowles, Sarah Boaden, Ruth Implement Sci Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs) were funded by NIHR in England in 2008 and 2014 as partnerships between universities and surrounding health service organisations, focused on improving the quality of healthcare through the conduct and application of applied health research. The aim of this review is to synthesise learning from evaluations of the CLAHRCs. METHODS: Fifteen databases including CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO were searched to identify any evaluations of CLAHRCs. Current and archived CLAHRC websites and the reference lists of retrieved articles were scanned to identify any additional evaluations. Searches were restricted to English language only. Any publications from evaluations of the CLAHRCs were eligible for inclusion if they fulfilled at least one of three pre-specified inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis was undertaken. RESULTS: Twenty-six evaluations (reported in 37 papers) were deemed eligible for inclusion. Evaluations focused on describing and exploring the formative partnerships, vision, values, structures and processes of CLAHRCs; the nature and role of boundaries; the deployment of knowledge brokers and hybrid roles to support knowledge mobilisation; patient and public involvement; and capacity building. The relative lack of data about the early impact of CLAHRCs on health care provision or outcomes is notable. CONCLUSIONS: Much of the evaluative focus on CLAHRCs has been on how they have been organised and on the development of theory around their emergent properties. Evidence is lacking on the impact of CLAHRCs particularly in relation to the knowledge mobilisation processes and practices adopted. Further evaluation of CLAHRCs and other similar research and practice partnerships is warranted and should focus on which knowledge mobilisation approaches work where, how and why. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42016042945). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-018-0805-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6094566/ /pubmed/30111339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0805-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Kislov, Roman
Wilson, Paul M.
Knowles, Sarah
Boaden, Ruth
Learning from the emergence of NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs): a systematic review of evaluations
title Learning from the emergence of NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs): a systematic review of evaluations
title_full Learning from the emergence of NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs): a systematic review of evaluations
title_fullStr Learning from the emergence of NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs): a systematic review of evaluations
title_full_unstemmed Learning from the emergence of NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs): a systematic review of evaluations
title_short Learning from the emergence of NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs): a systematic review of evaluations
title_sort learning from the emergence of nihr collaborations for leadership in applied health research and care (clahrcs): a systematic review of evaluations
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0805-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kislovroman learningfromtheemergenceofnihrcollaborationsforleadershipinappliedhealthresearchandcareclahrcsasystematicreviewofevaluations
AT wilsonpaulm learningfromtheemergenceofnihrcollaborationsforleadershipinappliedhealthresearchandcareclahrcsasystematicreviewofevaluations
AT knowlessarah learningfromtheemergenceofnihrcollaborationsforleadershipinappliedhealthresearchandcareclahrcsasystematicreviewofevaluations
AT boadenruth learningfromtheemergenceofnihrcollaborationsforleadershipinappliedhealthresearchandcareclahrcsasystematicreviewofevaluations