Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
BACKGROUND: The Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) is a new-generation biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent with the thinnest strut thickness to date developed to improve the percutaneous treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. We perform a meta-analysis of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0902-5 |
_version_ | 1783347847744192512 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Ping Zhou, Xin Zhang, Chenliang Li, Huakang Zhang, Zhihui Song, Zhiyuan |
author_facet | Zhu, Ping Zhou, Xin Zhang, Chenliang Li, Huakang Zhang, Zhihui Song, Zhiyuan |
author_sort | Zhu, Ping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) is a new-generation biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent with the thinnest strut thickness to date developed to improve the percutaneous treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. We perform a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of an ultra-thin, Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) compared with durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DESs). METHODS: Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing the safety and efficacy of O-SES versus DP-DES. Paired reviewers independently screened citations, assessed risk of bias of included studies, and extracted data. We used the Mantel-Haenszel method to calculate risk ratio (RR) by means of a random-effects model. RESULTS: Six RCTs with a total of 6949 patients were selected. All included trials were rated as low risk of bias. The O-SES significantly reduced the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.98; I(2) = 0%; 10 fewer per 1000 [from 1 fewer to 18 fewer]; high quality) compared with the DP-DES. There was no significant difference between O-SES and DP-DES in the prevention of stent thrombosis (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.52–1.08), cardiac death (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.63–1.36), target lesion revascularization (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86–1.42) and target vessel revascularization (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.78–1.21). CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, O-SES resulted in significantly lower rates of myocardial infarction than DP-DES and had a trend toward reduction in stent thrombosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6094581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60945812018-08-24 Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials Zhu, Ping Zhou, Xin Zhang, Chenliang Li, Huakang Zhang, Zhihui Song, Zhiyuan BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) is a new-generation biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent with the thinnest strut thickness to date developed to improve the percutaneous treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. We perform a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of an ultra-thin, Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) compared with durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DESs). METHODS: Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing the safety and efficacy of O-SES versus DP-DES. Paired reviewers independently screened citations, assessed risk of bias of included studies, and extracted data. We used the Mantel-Haenszel method to calculate risk ratio (RR) by means of a random-effects model. RESULTS: Six RCTs with a total of 6949 patients were selected. All included trials were rated as low risk of bias. The O-SES significantly reduced the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.98; I(2) = 0%; 10 fewer per 1000 [from 1 fewer to 18 fewer]; high quality) compared with the DP-DES. There was no significant difference between O-SES and DP-DES in the prevention of stent thrombosis (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.52–1.08), cardiac death (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.63–1.36), target lesion revascularization (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86–1.42) and target vessel revascularization (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.78–1.21). CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, O-SES resulted in significantly lower rates of myocardial infarction than DP-DES and had a trend toward reduction in stent thrombosis. BioMed Central 2018-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6094581/ /pubmed/30111289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0902-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhu, Ping Zhou, Xin Zhang, Chenliang Li, Huakang Zhang, Zhihui Song, Zhiyuan Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials |
title | Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0902-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuping safetyandefficacyofultrathinstrutbiodegradablepolymersirolimuselutingstentversusdurablepolymerdrugelutingstentsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials AT zhouxin safetyandefficacyofultrathinstrutbiodegradablepolymersirolimuselutingstentversusdurablepolymerdrugelutingstentsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials AT zhangchenliang safetyandefficacyofultrathinstrutbiodegradablepolymersirolimuselutingstentversusdurablepolymerdrugelutingstentsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials AT lihuakang safetyandefficacyofultrathinstrutbiodegradablepolymersirolimuselutingstentversusdurablepolymerdrugelutingstentsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials AT zhangzhihui safetyandefficacyofultrathinstrutbiodegradablepolymersirolimuselutingstentversusdurablepolymerdrugelutingstentsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials AT songzhiyuan safetyandefficacyofultrathinstrutbiodegradablepolymersirolimuselutingstentversusdurablepolymerdrugelutingstentsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials |