Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND: The Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) is a new-generation biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent with the thinnest strut thickness to date developed to improve the percutaneous treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. We perform a meta-analysis of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Ping, Zhou, Xin, Zhang, Chenliang, Li, Huakang, Zhang, Zhihui, Song, Zhiyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0902-5
_version_ 1783347847744192512
author Zhu, Ping
Zhou, Xin
Zhang, Chenliang
Li, Huakang
Zhang, Zhihui
Song, Zhiyuan
author_facet Zhu, Ping
Zhou, Xin
Zhang, Chenliang
Li, Huakang
Zhang, Zhihui
Song, Zhiyuan
author_sort Zhu, Ping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) is a new-generation biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent with the thinnest strut thickness to date developed to improve the percutaneous treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. We perform a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of an ultra-thin, Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) compared with durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DESs). METHODS: Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing the safety and efficacy of O-SES versus DP-DES. Paired reviewers independently screened citations, assessed risk of bias of included studies, and extracted data. We used the Mantel-Haenszel method to calculate risk ratio (RR) by means of a random-effects model. RESULTS: Six RCTs with a total of 6949 patients were selected. All included trials were rated as low risk of bias. The O-SES significantly reduced the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.98; I(2) = 0%; 10 fewer per 1000 [from 1 fewer to 18 fewer]; high quality) compared with the DP-DES. There was no significant difference between O-SES and DP-DES in the prevention of stent thrombosis (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.52–1.08), cardiac death (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.63–1.36), target lesion revascularization (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86–1.42) and target vessel revascularization (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.78–1.21). CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, O-SES resulted in significantly lower rates of myocardial infarction than DP-DES and had a trend toward reduction in stent thrombosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6094581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60945812018-08-24 Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials Zhu, Ping Zhou, Xin Zhang, Chenliang Li, Huakang Zhang, Zhihui Song, Zhiyuan BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) is a new-generation biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent with the thinnest strut thickness to date developed to improve the percutaneous treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. We perform a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of an ultra-thin, Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) compared with durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DESs). METHODS: Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing the safety and efficacy of O-SES versus DP-DES. Paired reviewers independently screened citations, assessed risk of bias of included studies, and extracted data. We used the Mantel-Haenszel method to calculate risk ratio (RR) by means of a random-effects model. RESULTS: Six RCTs with a total of 6949 patients were selected. All included trials were rated as low risk of bias. The O-SES significantly reduced the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.98; I(2) = 0%; 10 fewer per 1000 [from 1 fewer to 18 fewer]; high quality) compared with the DP-DES. There was no significant difference between O-SES and DP-DES in the prevention of stent thrombosis (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.52–1.08), cardiac death (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.63–1.36), target lesion revascularization (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86–1.42) and target vessel revascularization (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.78–1.21). CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, O-SES resulted in significantly lower rates of myocardial infarction than DP-DES and had a trend toward reduction in stent thrombosis. BioMed Central 2018-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6094581/ /pubmed/30111289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0902-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhu, Ping
Zhou, Xin
Zhang, Chenliang
Li, Huakang
Zhang, Zhihui
Song, Zhiyuan
Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
title Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
title_full Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
title_short Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
title_sort safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6094581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0902-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuping safetyandefficacyofultrathinstrutbiodegradablepolymersirolimuselutingstentversusdurablepolymerdrugelutingstentsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials
AT zhouxin safetyandefficacyofultrathinstrutbiodegradablepolymersirolimuselutingstentversusdurablepolymerdrugelutingstentsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials
AT zhangchenliang safetyandefficacyofultrathinstrutbiodegradablepolymersirolimuselutingstentversusdurablepolymerdrugelutingstentsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials
AT lihuakang safetyandefficacyofultrathinstrutbiodegradablepolymersirolimuselutingstentversusdurablepolymerdrugelutingstentsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials
AT zhangzhihui safetyandefficacyofultrathinstrutbiodegradablepolymersirolimuselutingstentversusdurablepolymerdrugelutingstentsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials
AT songzhiyuan safetyandefficacyofultrathinstrutbiodegradablepolymersirolimuselutingstentversusdurablepolymerdrugelutingstentsametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials