Cargando…

Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia

Background: Economic models are broadly used in the economic evaluation of antipsychotics in schizophrenia. Our objective was to summarize the structure of these models. Methods: Model-based economic evaluations of antipsychotics in schizophrenia were identified through Medline and Embase. General i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Junwen, Millier, Aurélie, Toumi, Mondher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6095033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2018.1508272
_version_ 1783347910824427520
author Zhou, Junwen
Millier, Aurélie
Toumi, Mondher
author_facet Zhou, Junwen
Millier, Aurélie
Toumi, Mondher
author_sort Zhou, Junwen
collection PubMed
description Background: Economic models are broadly used in the economic evaluation of antipsychotics in schizophrenia. Our objective was to summarize the structure of these models. Methods: Model-based economic evaluations of antipsychotics in schizophrenia were identified through Medline and Embase. General information was extracted including analysis type, model type, perspective, population, comparator, outcome, and timeframe. Model-specific structures for decision tree (DT), cohort- and patient-level Markov model (CLMM, PLMM), and discrete-event simulation (DES) models were extracted. Results: A screen of 1870 records identified 79 studies. These were mostly cost-utility analyses (n = 48) with CLMM (n = 32) or DT models (n = 29). They mostly applied payer perspective (n = 68), focused on general schizophrenia for relapse prevention (n = 73), compared pharmacotherapies as first-line (n = 71), and evaluated incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (n = 40) with a 1-year (n = 32) or 5-year (n = 26) projection. DT models progressed with the branching points of response, relapse, discontinuation, and adherence. CLMM models transitioned between disease states, whereas PLMM models transitioned between adverse event states with/without disease state. DES models moved forward with times to remission, relapse, psychiatrist visit, and death. Conclusions: A pattern of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia was identified. More subtle structures and patient-level models are suggested for a future modelling exercise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6095033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60950332018-08-20 Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia Zhou, Junwen Millier, Aurélie Toumi, Mondher J Mark Access Health Policy Review Article Background: Economic models are broadly used in the economic evaluation of antipsychotics in schizophrenia. Our objective was to summarize the structure of these models. Methods: Model-based economic evaluations of antipsychotics in schizophrenia were identified through Medline and Embase. General information was extracted including analysis type, model type, perspective, population, comparator, outcome, and timeframe. Model-specific structures for decision tree (DT), cohort- and patient-level Markov model (CLMM, PLMM), and discrete-event simulation (DES) models were extracted. Results: A screen of 1870 records identified 79 studies. These were mostly cost-utility analyses (n = 48) with CLMM (n = 32) or DT models (n = 29). They mostly applied payer perspective (n = 68), focused on general schizophrenia for relapse prevention (n = 73), compared pharmacotherapies as first-line (n = 71), and evaluated incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (n = 40) with a 1-year (n = 32) or 5-year (n = 26) projection. DT models progressed with the branching points of response, relapse, discontinuation, and adherence. CLMM models transitioned between disease states, whereas PLMM models transitioned between adverse event states with/without disease state. DES models moved forward with times to remission, relapse, psychiatrist visit, and death. Conclusions: A pattern of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia was identified. More subtle structures and patient-level models are suggested for a future modelling exercise. Routledge 2018-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6095033/ /pubmed/30128087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2018.1508272 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Zhou, Junwen
Millier, Aurélie
Toumi, Mondher
Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia
title Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia
title_full Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia
title_fullStr Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia
title_short Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia
title_sort systematic review of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6095033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30128087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2018.1508272
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoujunwen systematicreviewofpharmacoeconomicmodelsforschizophrenia
AT millieraurelie systematicreviewofpharmacoeconomicmodelsforschizophrenia
AT toumimondher systematicreviewofpharmacoeconomicmodelsforschizophrenia