Cargando…

Association between multifocal soft contact lens decentration and visual performance

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the association between decentration of several commercial multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) and various objective and subjective visual performance variables in presbyopic and non-presbyopic participants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All presbyopic (age &...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fedtke, Cathleen, Ehrmann, Klaus, Thomas, Varghese, Bakaraju, Ravi C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6095361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214350
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S108528
_version_ 1783347936834355200
author Fedtke, Cathleen
Ehrmann, Klaus
Thomas, Varghese
Bakaraju, Ravi C
author_facet Fedtke, Cathleen
Ehrmann, Klaus
Thomas, Varghese
Bakaraju, Ravi C
author_sort Fedtke, Cathleen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the association between decentration of several commercial multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) and various objective and subjective visual performance variables in presbyopic and non-presbyopic participants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All presbyopic (age >40 years, near add ≥+1.25 D) and non-presbyopic (age ≥18 years, no near add requirements, spherical equivalent ≤−0.50 D) participants were each fitted bilaterally with six and two MFCLs (test lens), respectively, and with one single vision lens (control lens). Lens decentration, ie, the x- and y-differences between the contact lens and pupil centers, was objectively determined. Third-order aberrations were measured and compared. Visual performance (high- and low-contrast acuities and several subjective variables) was analyzed for any associations (Pearson’s correlation, r) with MFCL decentration. RESULTS: A total of 17 presbyopic (55.1±6.9 years) and eight non-presbyopic (31.0±3.3 years) participants completed the study. All lenses displayed a temporal–inferior decentration (x=−0.36±0.29 mm, y=−0.28±0.28 mm, mean ± SD). Compared to the control, a significant inferior decentration was found for the Proclear(®) MFCL Near lens in both groups (y(presbyopic) =−0.26 mm, y(non-presbyopic) =−0.70 mm) and for the Proclear(®) MFCL Distance lens in the non-presbyopic group (y(non-presbyopic) =−0.69 mm). In both groups, lens-induced vertical coma (C(3, −1)) was, by at least tenfold, significantly more positive for the Proclear(®) MFCL Distance lens and significantly more negative for the Proclear(®) MFCL Near lens. In the presbyopic group, the correlation of total MFCL decentration with vision variables was weak (r<|0.191|). Conversely, a moderate but significant correlation with total MFCL decentration was found in the non-presbyopic group for most of the vision variables, indicating a decrease in vision as decentration increased. CONCLUSION: Certain MFCLs decentered more than others; the same lens designs also induced significant amounts of third-order aberrations. An association between MFCL decentration and seven out of nine vision variables was found in the non-presbyopic group, ie, the group where lenses were most decentered, which had larger pupils and lower levels of inherent third-order aberrations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6095361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60953612018-09-13 Association between multifocal soft contact lens decentration and visual performance Fedtke, Cathleen Ehrmann, Klaus Thomas, Varghese Bakaraju, Ravi C Clin Optom (Auckl) Original Research PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the association between decentration of several commercial multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) and various objective and subjective visual performance variables in presbyopic and non-presbyopic participants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All presbyopic (age >40 years, near add ≥+1.25 D) and non-presbyopic (age ≥18 years, no near add requirements, spherical equivalent ≤−0.50 D) participants were each fitted bilaterally with six and two MFCLs (test lens), respectively, and with one single vision lens (control lens). Lens decentration, ie, the x- and y-differences between the contact lens and pupil centers, was objectively determined. Third-order aberrations were measured and compared. Visual performance (high- and low-contrast acuities and several subjective variables) was analyzed for any associations (Pearson’s correlation, r) with MFCL decentration. RESULTS: A total of 17 presbyopic (55.1±6.9 years) and eight non-presbyopic (31.0±3.3 years) participants completed the study. All lenses displayed a temporal–inferior decentration (x=−0.36±0.29 mm, y=−0.28±0.28 mm, mean ± SD). Compared to the control, a significant inferior decentration was found for the Proclear(®) MFCL Near lens in both groups (y(presbyopic) =−0.26 mm, y(non-presbyopic) =−0.70 mm) and for the Proclear(®) MFCL Distance lens in the non-presbyopic group (y(non-presbyopic) =−0.69 mm). In both groups, lens-induced vertical coma (C(3, −1)) was, by at least tenfold, significantly more positive for the Proclear(®) MFCL Distance lens and significantly more negative for the Proclear(®) MFCL Near lens. In the presbyopic group, the correlation of total MFCL decentration with vision variables was weak (r<|0.191|). Conversely, a moderate but significant correlation with total MFCL decentration was found in the non-presbyopic group for most of the vision variables, indicating a decrease in vision as decentration increased. CONCLUSION: Certain MFCLs decentered more than others; the same lens designs also induced significant amounts of third-order aberrations. An association between MFCL decentration and seven out of nine vision variables was found in the non-presbyopic group, ie, the group where lenses were most decentered, which had larger pupils and lower levels of inherent third-order aberrations. Dove Medical Press 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6095361/ /pubmed/30214350 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S108528 Text en © 2016 Fedtke et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Fedtke, Cathleen
Ehrmann, Klaus
Thomas, Varghese
Bakaraju, Ravi C
Association between multifocal soft contact lens decentration and visual performance
title Association between multifocal soft contact lens decentration and visual performance
title_full Association between multifocal soft contact lens decentration and visual performance
title_fullStr Association between multifocal soft contact lens decentration and visual performance
title_full_unstemmed Association between multifocal soft contact lens decentration and visual performance
title_short Association between multifocal soft contact lens decentration and visual performance
title_sort association between multifocal soft contact lens decentration and visual performance
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6095361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214350
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S108528
work_keys_str_mv AT fedtkecathleen associationbetweenmultifocalsoftcontactlensdecentrationandvisualperformance
AT ehrmannklaus associationbetweenmultifocalsoftcontactlensdecentrationandvisualperformance
AT thomasvarghese associationbetweenmultifocalsoftcontactlensdecentrationandvisualperformance
AT bakarajuravic associationbetweenmultifocalsoftcontactlensdecentrationandvisualperformance